Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/27/11 at 12:50 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
[quote]RockyMtnTigerWDE The Fans....Other than that they are pretty solid and balanced.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 12:54 am to biglego
quote:
LSU leads the SEC in sacks with 32
Is that through Arkansas. I know UGA had at least two today and they were sitting on 30. However, I have no idea if those numbers are in SEC games only.
BY the way, having Lbers get lost covering TE and short routes over the middle "might" be a problem against UGA. You see they have two receiving threats that make their living in that zone- Charles and Bennet.
As I have mentioned before, if the UGA OL ( which is a middling outfit at best) can hold up, the biggest advantage UGA will have against LSU is their multiplicity of weapons. There is no star RB or WR to double cover. And unlike Arkansas O which is predicated on mostly timed passing routes, UGA's is pretty open ended and based on coverage.
However, LSU depth is going to really test the UGA OL which literally has no depth.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 12:54 am to dreaux
Pass game. Hasn't really mattered this season, but if we had to pass the ball 40 times in a game, do you really believe we would win that game?
Posted on 11/27/11 at 1:15 am to SoGaFan
quote:
Overlords of the secr, what are lsu's weaknesses? quote: LSU leads the SEC in sacks with 32 Is that through Arkansas. I know UGA had at least two today and they were sitting on 30. However, I have no idea if those numbers are in SEC games only. BY the way, having Lbers get lost covering TE and short routes over the middle "might" be a problem against UGA. You see they have two receiving threats that make their living in that zone- Charles and Bennet. As I have mentioned before, if the UGA OL ( which is a middling outfit at best) can hold up, the biggest advantage UGA will have against LSU is their multiplicity of weapons. There is no star RB or WR to double cover. And unlike Arkansas O which is predicated on mostly timed passing routes, UGA's is pretty open ended and based on coverage. However, LSU depth is going to really test the UGA OL which literally has no depth.
This isn't a prediction thread for the seccg.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 1:38 am to dreaux
only that they are more badass than badass.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 1:40 am to gatorprincess815
mayne put the packers against lsu and you see what happen....Pack gon' win!!!!
Lsu overrated mayne.
Lsu overrated mayne.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 1:41 am to Clemens
LSU would own the Pack and Honey Badger would make Aaron Rodgers cry.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 2:19 am to dreaux
Hey dreaux, with sufficient funding I could build a team that could beat LSU. It would be costly, but it would be like taking a team and putting all the players on steroids (without doing anything illegal). Imagine having an offensive line averaging 350 to 375 lbs with a 20% higher than normal bone mass and less than 5% body fat. hehehe. It's good to be a mad scientists. 
If I ever meet Jerry Jones... hahaha
If I ever meet Jerry Jones... hahaha
Posted on 11/27/11 at 2:26 am to JB Bama
quote:Has anyone else pointed out how retarded this post is? Because this guy should be publicly ridiculed for this shite.
Average to good Oline, weak pass rush, overactive corners (risk-reward), very little talent at QB, All those reasons that lead to you putting up less than 250 yards vs. Alabama.
You guys have had a stellar season, but lets not forget AJ almost hung 300 on you in the air, Trent had a combined 165.
You have a very good secondary, Dline, strong power run game, excellent special teams, and your defense is much more opportunistic than Bama. Your coach is more flexible and takes more risks and might be the luckiest man on the planet (not to take away from his excellent coaching ability).
Posted on 11/27/11 at 4:32 am to Derrick
quote:
Only one real good receiver,not a lot of speed at running back...but a very good stable of powerful backs coaching is good but not great
Posted on 11/27/11 at 8:07 am to Derrick
"not a lot of speed at running back...but a very good stable of powerful backs"
I suppose that if we had faster backs we would have run for 2000 yds against Ark.
I suppose that if we had faster backs we would have run for 2000 yds against Ark.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 8:25 am to Slinger16
quote:
Fear of Bama
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News