Started By
Message
re: On3: "How Good Can Tennessee Really Be?
Posted on 9/9/24 at 6:57 pm to Smokeyone
Posted on 9/9/24 at 6:57 pm to Smokeyone
For the record, I don't personally care to see who upvoted/diwnvoted, but when every post in a game thread has one downvote, you do want to know who it is and why they would waste that much time.
Of course, it's usually obvious.
Of course, it's usually obvious.
2
Posted on 9/9/24 at 7:26 pm to AulderMagee
quote:
Sure thing, right after he shows where I was 'exposed'.
Your business with him is irrelevant to our business.
Posted on 9/9/24 at 7:32 pm to wdhalgren
quote:Isn't On3 located in Tennessee? But if you want the real answer to their leanings, look at who is employed there.
Honest question: does On3 have an NIL deal with Iamaleava? I've noticed that they use his image all over their website (like every single recruit's Recruiting page) and JD Pickell does a video about him every few days. If I recall correctly On3 has a former Vol player in charge of their NIL department.
Posted on 9/9/24 at 7:34 pm to dallastiger55
quote:OU has an offense as bad as A&M's. And that is saying something. Not a prayer. The only question is will Heupel run it up against his school ...
OU is beating Tennessee. Bookmark
Posted on 9/9/24 at 7:45 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Of course, it's usually obvious.
I upvote every game thread post when I’m in them just to be spiteful to the downvoter.
Posted on 9/9/24 at 7:59 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
I upvote every game thread post when I’m in them just to be spiteful to the downvoter.
I just downvoted that
Posted on 9/10/24 at 3:36 am to kywildcatfanone
quote:
For the record, I don't personally care to see who upvoted/diwnvoted
Yet you run your dikksucker about it nonstop.
For the record.
Posted on 9/10/24 at 4:59 am to AulderMagee
Everyone knows it's you. It's not like you can hide it. Breakfast shift today I see.
Posted on 9/10/24 at 6:23 am to Smokeyone
quote:
It’s called free use. The university and the various reporting agents (ESPN/Disney/ABC/SEC) allow images to be used in the public domain. But he’s a hot commodity so the free use images drive traffic.
That’s not usually how it works for media. Here’s how it works….. Photographers are the sole owners of the photos they take. So if I take a pic of you or Nico or anyone else it’s mine to do with as I please. Sports photographers tend to license these out to orgs like Getty and websites/print media pay a blanket fee for access to image libraries. There are other ways to do it but this is how major media does it.
The subject of a photo has no ownership of photos taken in public.
Depending on the pic and setup, universities take promotional photos that athletes sign off on. The university owns those pictures and uses them for promo stuff and sometimes allows promotional use by others free of charge (think of the yearbook photos during broadcasts) but no media site worth its salt wants to run the same image all the time or at the same time as his competitor so you get the aforementioned sports photographers freelancing or working directly for an org.
This post was edited on 9/10/24 at 6:53 am
Posted on 9/10/24 at 6:37 am to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Everyone knows it's you. It's not like you can hide it.
Although personally, you don't care
Even if you run your dikksucker about it nonstop.
This post was edited on 9/10/24 at 6:39 am
Posted on 9/10/24 at 6:40 am to Imber
So when are you going to stop posting under your two Vol alters that you admitted to?
And who are they? That whisky guy?
This post was edited on 9/10/24 at 6:41 am
Posted on 9/10/24 at 7:02 am to AulderMagee
quote:
So when are you going to stop posting under your two Vol alters that you admitted to?
And who are they? That whisky guy?
I have no idea what you're talking about. Just own it.
Posted on 9/10/24 at 7:27 am to AulderMagee
You admitted to it.
Just own it.
Just own it.
Posted on 9/10/24 at 7:54 am to AulderMagee
Do you serve spam at Burger King like you do here?
Posted on 9/10/24 at 8:56 am to Prof
Sorry for the confusion, I wasn’t saying Nico was allowing it’s use but rather ABC, Disney,SEC etc. and a blanket agreement would be the norm for accredited use
Posted on 9/10/24 at 9:09 am to Dawg4Life47
quote:
Their first 3 games have been Chattanooga, NC State and Kent State
Ummm, weak sauce if I have ever seen it
Let's look at Georgia's first 4 games from last year vs Tennessee's this year:
UGA 2023
UT Martin
Ball State
South Carolina
UAB
UT 2024
Chattanooga
#24 NC State
Kent State
#15 Oklahoma (current rating)
So, the only difference is that Tennessee's first 4 games had 2 teams that were in the top 25 at that time.
Posted on 9/10/24 at 11:34 am to Prof
quote:
The subject of a photo has no ownership of photos taken in public.
I'm curious about this (genuinely).
Are sporting events considered public? I ask because you can't film and then later sell the film of a NFL game. It's owned by the NFL, not by the person who filmed it. So I'm not sure how that actually works from a legal perspective with a photograph.
I'd think that images of players during college football games are owned by the schools, signed over to them. Don't photographers need to get some sort of permission to sell their photo's at that event (usually given with press credentials I assume).
I don't think the player owns it, but I'd think the school does.
Posted on 9/10/24 at 11:39 am to AulderMagee
quote:
You admitted last week to having two different Tennessee alters.
Let’s see that admission This time
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News