Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:16 pm to NIH
quote:
This whole argument is stupid, coonass posted some dumb shite and nearly all of you bite and go full tard in the paint with him.
Agree because we are trying to figure out TD's greatest mystery. Is corch the biggest troll of all time or a mentally underdeveloped adult with access to the internet.
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:16 pm to CoonassBulldog
quote:
You guys have lost the upperhand and better program status
Because we have more wins in every single decade? You basically just said winning CUSA and losing the liberty bowl is better than coming 5th in the west and winning the gator bowl. Come on now, they won a championship therefore they're better. Doesn't matter that they finished lower in the polls, played an easier schedule, or won a championship that didn't mean much at the time.
Once again coach, if we are the ones that live in the past and being up our sec championships won in the 60's why are you going so far back? Why not do the numbers from 2001 instead of 1991?
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:16 pm to NIH
quote:
This whole argument is stupid, coonass posted some dumb shite and nearly all of you bite and go full tard in the paint with him.
Y'all have Atlanta on us. I'll give you that. And it doesn't matter if we went 7-1 in '03 we still didn't go. I know that. But here's a serious question.
If the '08 Ole Miss team played the '98 State team when they both had everything clicking, who would win?
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:16 pm to OBReb6
K
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:17 pm to OBReb6
quote:
Both of them had winning seasons. 98 State lost to a 4 win LSU team and got drilled by a 5 win Okie State team.
Cough cough
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:17 pm to Henry Jones Jr
I wouldn't bet on either.
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:18 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
If the '08 Ole Miss team played the '98 State team when they both had everything clicking, who would win?
You know damn well who would win. 99 State would be a better comparison and we would still win because we had a competant offense.
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:19 pm to NIH
It would be interesting to see. It would be low scoring as hell. If I remember right State had the #1 defense in the country that year (or in '99) and we had our best defense the school has ever seen (excluding '59).
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:19 pm to NIH
quote:
State has played in a Cotton Bowl somewhat recently, Ole Miss has never played in the SEC title game.
98 is recent? Since y'all lost over two decades ago we have won three cotton bowls. Your west championship is about as viable as ours in 03
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:21 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
we had our best defense the school has ever seen (excluding '59).
False. We had the number 1 defense in the nation one of the years in the early 90s with Joe Lee Dunn.
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:24 pm to OBReb6
Your 2008 team had it's strength up front on the dline and secondary. Pretty much the same as the '99 team. Snead would be the better QB but Jackie was the better coach.
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:26 pm to NIH
quote:
Jackie was the better coach.
Yea Nutt would do something stupid like run DMC on the 1 yard line instead of a bigger back.
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:27 pm to NIH
quote:
Jackie was the better coach.
Agree. I wonder what that team would have done with 2 years under Jackie and Joe Lee Dunn.
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:27 pm to Whereisomaha
Cotton Bowls are the end all be all bowl games, I suppose.
Your fixation on that bowl is something I'd describe as Bundy or coonesque.
Your fixation on that bowl is something I'd describe as Bundy or coonesque.
This post was edited on 7/30/12 at 5:28 pm
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:28 pm to NIH
quote:
Cotton Bowls are the end all be all bowl games, I suppose.
For the MS schools I guess. Neither of us have been to a better bowl in the modern era
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:31 pm to NIH
quote:
Your fixation on that bowl is something I'd describe as Bundy or coonesque.
Which bowl would you like to talk about that we've been to? Liberty, music, maybe independence? I bring it up because it's the best bowl we have both been too and also it illustrates how weak the west was when you won it. The winner of the west goes to the NC game now and apparently so does second. The cotton bowl took us when we finished 2nd, 3rd, and 3rd in the west. Plus we actually won the bowl, three times
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:32 pm to NIH
The 99 State team had the highest final ranking in Mississippi in 43 years. That makes it the best team in this time period.
After that, I'd go:
'08 OM
'03 OM
'98 MSU
'10 MSU
'09 OM
Your '08 team was a potential national champion, and your '03 team would've been with any defense whatsoever. Both teams lost games they should have won, while winning games they weren't supposed to.
After that, I'd go:
'08 OM
'03 OM
'98 MSU
'10 MSU
'09 OM
Your '08 team was a potential national champion, and your '03 team would've been with any defense whatsoever. Both teams lost games they should have won, while winning games they weren't supposed to.
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:34 pm to engie
quote:
The 99 State team had the highest final ranking in Mississippi in 43 years. That makes it the best team in this time period.
Bu bu bu they didn't win the west.. They can't be better!
Posted on 7/30/12 at 5:36 pm to OBReb6
So, since 91
OM
127 total wins
63 SEC wins
9 bowls
MSU
117 total wins
62 SEC wins
9 bowls
3 cotton bowl wins trumphs any of your bowls by a lot. Looks like we're slightly better program still.
OM
127 total wins
63 SEC wins
9 bowls
MSU
117 total wins
62 SEC wins
9 bowls
3 cotton bowl wins trumphs any of your bowls by a lot. Looks like we're slightly better program still.
Page 11 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News