Started By
Message
re: Ole Miss one of the most prolific offenses in the nation?
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:40 pm to Slippery Slope
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:40 pm to Slippery Slope
ETA: 100
This post was edited on 10/9/12 at 7:40 pm
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:41 pm to pankReb
quote:Well, at least you admit that Freeze did acknowledge that Wallace has to get better or lose his starting position. Whereisomaha is still struggling with that apparently.
Freeze, unlike Merlins, actually answers questions asked of him by reporters.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:41 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
This was absolutely the case. We played like shite, gave the ball away 6 times, and y'all STILL couldn't capitalize. I don't know what else there is to say.
Ole Miss defense created those turnovers.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:42 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
Well, at least you admit that Freeze did acknowledge that Wallace has to get better or lose his starting position.
Wallace probably already knows that. Freeze probably said something about it.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:43 pm to pankReb
Ole Miss has a very difficult offense to cover as it's up-paced tempo causes defenses trouble.
Unfortunately, it is snake oil. Strong defenses that shut down the offense most of the time will be less likely to be scored upon by any offense that deals with ball control. Teams that just want to hold the ball by moving at a 3.4 yard per attempt will effectively stop such an offense from their 80+play 30+ point range.
Unfortunately, it is snake oil. Strong defenses that shut down the offense most of the time will be less likely to be scored upon by any offense that deals with ball control. Teams that just want to hold the ball by moving at a 3.4 yard per attempt will effectively stop such an offense from their 80+play 30+ point range.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:44 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
So both of our defenses blow arse. That's what i took away from this post.
I mean 2 more yards per play is quite a bit of difference...
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:44 pm to Porky
quote:
Ole Miss defense created those turnovers.
And?
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:46 pm to Whereisomaha
quote:Since y'all are doing "play like". A&M would have had 800 yards with zero turn overs.
Then why isn't there a disparity in yards?
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:49 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
Well, at least you admit that Freeze did acknowledge that Wallace has to get better or lose his starting position. Whereisomaha is still struggling with that apparently.
If you think he will lose his spot you're crazy, who the hell else would play and do better?
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:50 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I mean 2 more yards per play is quite a bit of difference...
Difference between our 2 defenses was we were forcing turnovers. Y'all got one fluke pick 6 and I'll give you the interception at the end of the game. Your guy did a great job jumping that rout.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:52 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
And?
Y'all played well enough to win. But Ole Miss gave A&M about as much as they could handle.
Yes, I know y'all kicked our butt.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:52 pm to skirpnasty
quote:
If you think he will lose his spot you're crazy, who the hell else would play and do better?
Wallace is the best passer but Brunetti isn't terrible when he makes passes that don't exceed 15 yards. He's better at running the option.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:52 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
Difference between our 2 defenses was we were forcing turnovers. Y'all got one fluke pick 6 and I'll give you the interception at the end of the game. Your guy did a great job jumping that rout.
And it got you no where? You lost because your offense couldn't move the ball?
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:54 pm to TeLeFaWx
No, we lost thanks to being cursed.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:54 pm to skirpnasty
quote:OK - one more time. Just the facts as reported. I don't know and really don't care until Thanksgiving.
If you think he will lose his spot you're crazy, who the hell else would play and do better?
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:54 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
Difference between our 2 defenses was we were forcing turnovers. Y'all got one fluke pick 6 and I'll give you the interception at the end of the game. Your guy did a great job jumping that rout.
FWIW analysts will tell you that interceptions are more skill based and fumbles largely rely on luck. The reasoning behind this is obviously because fumbles can almost always be credited to poor ball security which is a failure of the carrier. I realize a good hard hit can help and you have the occasional INT that is just a fluke.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:56 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
You lost because your offense couldn't move the ball
464 total yards
305 passing yards
159 rushing yards.
Yeah we were really struggling to move the ball on that stellar defense of yours.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:57 pm to skirpnasty
That int before half was the biggest fluke of the year
Posted on 10/9/12 at 7:57 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Silly reb, Texas doesn't allow statistics.
Back to top



0





