Started By
Message
re: Now the important question, did Dorrell
Posted on 4/11/12 at 8:10 pm to ArkLaTexTiger
Posted on 4/11/12 at 8:10 pm to ArkLaTexTiger
highly doubt she will keep the job for more than one reason.. Everyone at the office might look at her a bit funny. Not a safe work environment anymore thats for sure. Some of these hog fans might kneecap her arse on the way to lunch.
This post was edited on 4/11/12 at 8:11 pm
1
Posted on 4/11/12 at 8:27 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
All of this talk about her not keeping the job sounds well and good...until she plays the "he used his position of authority to coerce me" card.
They can't fire her without risking a sexual harassment lawsuit. They'll buy her out.
This
Posted on 4/11/12 at 8:28 pm to Sig
Let her stay. Give her nothing of importance to do. What harm can she do? Let the misery set in and she will leave on her own. Cheapest way out for UofA.
Posted on 4/11/12 at 8:32 pm to MSCoastTigerGirl
quote:
2/3/2012 The ChizMan Cometh became a SECr legend.
I was there.
Posted on 4/11/12 at 9:23 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
All of this talk about her not keeping the job sounds well and good...until she plays the "he used his position of authority to coerce me" card.
Doubt it...not likely she will keep the position that Petrino gave her over those 158 other applicants. More likely that position will be reopened to avoid a lawsuit. Jessica might be given another job different to avoid being fired, but at this point the possible damages from lawsuits with those 158 that were passed over is larger that the damage of a lawsuit from Jessica if she is removed from a job she was unfairly given.
Posted on 4/11/12 at 9:27 pm to TulsaTimeTiger
quote:Except that she was well qualified for the position
but at this point the possible damages from lawsuits with those 158 that were passed over is larger that the damage of a lawsuit
Posted on 4/11/12 at 9:40 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
All of this talk about her not keeping the job sounds well and good...until she plays the "he used his position of authority to coerce me" card.
No No, they have every right to fire her now. They couldn't touch her while Petrino was still employed there. Now that he is gone they have every right right to punish her for an inappropriate relationship. She could only use that card if he was retained and they tried to fire or move her. Trust me on that, I haven't been wrong yet about any of this. 2 consecutive years on a state agency's grievance committee I knew the EEOC laws as well as our lawyer did.
This post was edited on 4/11/12 at 9:57 pm
Posted on 4/11/12 at 9:53 pm to MaroonNation
quote:Your spelling is horrible but I chaired the same committee upon which you served for a time (the state agency, I mean). You might be correct on the right to fire her but prudence would dictate that you don't. She is harmless (no computer, no email, no telephone in her office), etc., etc. I learned from the master of getting rid of folks without damage.
2 consecutive years on a state agencie's grievance committee I knew the EEOC laws as well as our lawyer did.
Posted on 4/11/12 at 9:56 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
but I chaired the same committee upon which you served for a time
Damn crazy arse UMC folks
quote:
Your spelling is horrible
Never said I was overly qualifed
This post was edited on 4/11/12 at 9:58 pm
Posted on 4/11/12 at 10:03 pm to MaroonNation
Was Gilmore still over EOC when you served?
Posted on 4/11/12 at 10:12 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
Gilmore
Johnny fricking slouchy dressing Gilmore. Yes he was. Never have I seen a more incompetent token hire in my entire life.
This post was edited on 4/11/12 at 10:13 pm
Posted on 4/11/12 at 11:08 pm to cokebottleag
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News