Started By
Message
re: Not understanding the t.u. hype....
Posted on 10/18/24 at 2:35 pm to FootballFrenzy
Posted on 10/18/24 at 2:35 pm to FootballFrenzy
quote:
bullshite.
Texas: @Michigan, vs MSST, vs OU (neutral)
A&M: vs ND (>Michigan), at Florida (>MSST), vs Arkansas (>OU), vs Missouri (P4 SE
Maybe don't play FCS teams....
1
Posted on 10/18/24 at 2:36 pm to FootballFrenzy
quote:
Arkansas. Notre Dame.
One of those teams beat an over hyped Tenner team (solid win but that's all they've done). The other lost to NIU.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 2:36 pm to TexasOnTop
quote:
Maybe don't play FCS teams....
McNeese + BG does not make up for ULM, UTSA, and CO State.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 2:38 pm to FootballFrenzy
BG is 2-4 and gave y'all a serious run for your money. McNeese is a FCS team which will always make your SOS weaker than scheduling almost any FBS teams.
This post was edited on 10/18/24 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 10/18/24 at 2:40 pm to TexasOnTop
quote:
BG is 2-4 and gave y'all a serious run for your money. McNeese is a FCS team which will always make your SOS weaker than almost all FBS teams.
Yes, but BG also gave PSU a serious run for their money.
Combined winning percentage of A&M's P4 opponents: 15-7, 68%
Combined winning percentage of Texas' P4 opponents: 9-9, 50%.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 2:46 pm to FootballFrenzy
quote:
Yes, but BG also gave PSU a serious run for their money.
Combined winning percentage of A&M's P4 opponents: 15-7, 68%
Combined winning percentage of Texas' P4 opponents: 9-9, 50%.
Are you making the argument that Texas A&M > Texas?
Posted on 10/18/24 at 2:47 pm to BigBro
quote:
Are you making the argument that Texas A&M > Texas?
No, I'm making the argument that A&M's schedule has been much harder than Texas' through Week 7.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 2:49 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
Were they, they almost lost to several very very bad teams
And then they got destroyed by Washington in their bowl game
It's like you guys never watch college football. You're all that 10 second Tom guy from 50 blind dates. Every season, you suddenly think every past champion won every game 100-0.
Almost losing is not the same thing as losing. In fact, it's extremely different.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 2:52 pm to FootballFrenzy
quote:
Yes, but BG also gave PSU a serious run for their money.
Combined winning percentage of A&M's P4 opponents: 15-7, 68%
Combined winning percentage of Texas' P4 opponents: 9-9, 50%.
PSU is also consistently way over ranked... and they're 2-4.
You're considering Notre Dame ( consistently over ranked much like PSU), P4?
Posted on 10/18/24 at 2:53 pm to TexasOnTop
quote:
You're considering Notre Dame ( consistently over ranked much like PSU), P4?
Yes. They're wiping out P4 teams (admittedly bad ones, but that's what good P4 teams do to each other sometimes).
Posted on 10/18/24 at 2:53 pm to Old Sarge
quote:31-37 is "destroyed"?
then they got destroyed by Washington in their bowl game
Posted on 10/18/24 at 2:53 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
Not understanding the t.u. hype...
Who is the best looking team in the country right now then?
Posted on 10/18/24 at 2:55 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
Who is the best looking team in the country right now then?
Texas is, but they're playing against crap competition.
Beat Georgia by 2+ scores, and the "Texas is overhyped" narrative should stop.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 2:57 pm to FootballFrenzy
quote:
They're wiping out P4 teams (admittedly bad ones, but that's what good P4 teams do to each other sometimes)
And Texas is blowing out P4 teams with a winning record, not 2-4 Stanford and 1-5 Purdue. So obviously if ND is good, Texas must be great!
This post was edited on 10/18/24 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 10/18/24 at 2:59 pm to TexasOnTop
quote:
And Texas is blowing out P4 teams with a winning record, not 2-4 Stanford and 1-5 Purdue. So obviously is ND is good, Texas must be great!
Nobody said Texas wasn't good.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 3:00 pm to FootballFrenzy
No but you basically just said that ND's competition didn't matter. So Texas' also must not matter.
This post was edited on 10/18/24 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 10/18/24 at 3:00 pm to DBird
quote:
It's a satire post copying not understanding the aandm hype on the first page. You're embarrassing your brethren like your team embarrassed you against Vandy. Dummy
Yes, it's a response thread. I don't think that was a mystery.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 3:02 pm to TexasOnTop
quote:
Np but you basically just said that ND's competition didn't matter. So Texas' also must not matter.
No...I didn't.
My argument: A&M's SOS through 6 games has been significantly tougher than Texas'. Agree or disagree?
Posted on 10/18/24 at 3:02 pm to FootballFrenzy
quote:
Texas is, but they're playing against crap competition.
Their schedule is fine imo. If they struggle with the schedule ahead then it will show and correct itself. But that’s why they have hype.
Posted on 10/18/24 at 3:06 pm to FootballFrenzy
quote:
But context, dude. Do you disagree with any of my points about A&M's P4 teams being tougher opponents than Texas's?
You're just cherry picking data. Like Notre Dame lost to a really bad team. Michigan has 2 losses, but they also have the 6th most difficult schedule and one of those losses is to Texas.
If Notre Dame had lost to Texas A&M, are they still better than Michigan?
So basically, your "tougher schedule" is based on the fact that you lost and Texas didn't.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News