It's a farce. I didn't mind Notre Dame getting left out, but I don't think there is a sane person on Earth that would disagree that ND would destroy JMU and Tulane. Hell, there's a long list of 5 loss teams that would probably do the same.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by KPBuckeye87

Member since Aug 2025

147 posts

Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:07 pm to TigerFanPA

We had Boise and TCU with their runs that were legit but those days are gone and I don't see a G5 team competing against top teams. Unless they finish top 15 with at least two wins over ranked power 4 teams they shouldn't be eligible for the playoffs.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by JamalMurry27

Tennessee Titans

Member since May 2023

7996 posts

Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:08 pm to supersaints9

There is no 3 pt shot heater in football

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by bttrflyjss87

Member since Sep 2024

84 posts

Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:13 pm to TigerFanPA

quote:
Time to reconsider their inclusion over better teams.

The announcers discussed this during the end of the OM/Tulane game. G5 teams are let in to avoid anti-trust lawsuits against the P4 conferences.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by chadr07

Pineville, Louisiana

Member since Jan 2015

12747 posts

Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:39 pm to supersaints9

quote:
Calm down Nancy . jMU is about to cut it to 3

Yea about that

Like we said, teams like JMU and Tulane has no business being in the playoffs ever.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Delupe

Member since Oct 2025

133 posts

Posted on 12/20/25 at 8:40 pm to TigerFanPA

Sure...Let's ban the G5...we'll have better games.

B12: GA 65 , TCU-7; LSU 63 , OKLA 28; USC 55, OK 19, Bama 38, UT 17
ACC: ORE 59 ,FL ST 20; Penn St 38, SMU 10;
B10: Bama 30 ,Mich St 0; Clemson 31, Ohio St 0: FL 41, Ohio St 14
SEC: Ohio St 42, Tenn 7
ND: Clem 30, ND 3, Bama 42, ND 14

Do believe they need to tweak format...must finish year within final CFP top 12.

Page 1 2