Started By
Message
re: NIL Question
Posted on 11/29/21 at 11:07 am to Tiger_Claw
Posted on 11/29/21 at 11:07 am to Tiger_Claw
quote:
You're really making Arkansas proud. Way to show off that Hog education.
Can’t all pretend to be pretentious smart schools, that no one wants to go to anymore.
0
Posted on 11/29/21 at 11:09 am to bamameister
quote:
Big business and a player's agent are all that's needed to get around any problem associated with making millionaires out of these players.
I figured that, boosters would step up, but if you had a Heisman winning QB wouldn’t it make sense to have him as your face?
All this is really because I wanted to see some awkward old TV commercials, but do they even do those anymore? I don’t watch Cable/Satellite anymore, unless the game is on.
This post was edited on 11/29/21 at 11:14 am
Posted on 11/29/21 at 11:13 am to bamameister
I think most schools are erring on the side of caution
I know LSU had some issues come up with international athletes they had to work through as well
Nothing will stop the NCAA for coming back later and questioning something
I know LSU had some issues come up with international athletes they had to work through as well
Nothing will stop the NCAA for coming back later and questioning something
Posted on 11/29/21 at 11:17 am to FayetteNAM
It's not happening, no matter how many times you ask the question.
Posted on 11/29/21 at 11:23 am to Hogwallop
quote:
It's not happening, no matter how many times you ask the question.
Well no shite. I’m just saying you can’t say there isn’t a value to it, so how would the NCAA stop you? I think the NCAA is dying anyway, probably stick to regulating Olympic and other non money making sports.
The 2nd part was, is there any kick arse regrettably awkward commercials?
Posted on 11/29/21 at 12:31 pm to FayetteNAM
NIL aside, all DI schools may provide athletes vehicles as long as they're at least ostensibly for getting to class.
From DI bylaw 16.3.4
That's part of the end result of Alston vs NCAA. In their appeals, the NCAA complained this means schools can provide athletes with vehicles, even luxury ones, to get to class. The SCOTUS reminded them that, as per paragraph 3 of the injunction, they are free to ask the district court to amend the injunction to allow them to enforce a "no Lamborghini rule" or whatever, but they have not done that. Not yet, anyway.
BTW, the presiding judge in that case is now presiding over a NIL-related antitrust class action that could lead to an injunction against NCAA-wide and division-wide NIL restrictions, so there's that, too.
From DI bylaw 16.3.4
quote:
A conference or institution may provide...tangible items not included in the cost of attendance calculation but nonetheless related to the pursuit of academic studies
That's part of the end result of Alston vs NCAA. In their appeals, the NCAA complained this means schools can provide athletes with vehicles, even luxury ones, to get to class. The SCOTUS reminded them that, as per paragraph 3 of the injunction, they are free to ask the district court to amend the injunction to allow them to enforce a "no Lamborghini rule" or whatever, but they have not done that. Not yet, anyway.
BTW, the presiding judge in that case is now presiding over a NIL-related antitrust class action that could lead to an injunction against NCAA-wide and division-wide NIL restrictions, so there's that, too.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News