Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/9/26 at 9:31 am to travelgamer
quote:
There would be no granting of redshirts or waivers in order to receive additional years, except in extraordinary circumstances.
This is where they’re going to trip on their dicks again
Posted on 4/9/26 at 9:43 am to lsufball19
So... I propose the following to keep class designations straight....
Freshman
Sophomore
Junior
Senior
Chambliss-Senior
Freshman
Sophomore
Junior
Senior
Chambliss-Senior
Posted on 4/9/26 at 11:33 am to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
quote:
Look it's not about Pavia. It was that Kangaroo Court Crap that you guys pulled. After that the NCAA said enough is enough.
When they gave a kid his 9th year of eligibility just before saying no to Chambliss, at that point they deserved to have a court overrule them. They’re not a victim
Coming to say this. HE gets a 9th year why Owen Heinecke gets denied because he played all of 15 total minutes of Lacrosse at Ohio State .
Posted on 4/9/26 at 12:10 pm to RTRnFlorida
quote:
Then it became 6 to play 4, with one grey and redshirt. Oldest kid was 23 ish
6 to play 4 is plenty generous. It can account for both a Freshman Grey Shirt year, and an additional year for Injury Redshirt. I think doing that and allowing a single transfer without losing eligibility is fine. I think with more than 1 transfer, sitting a year is acceptable. There may be some wiggle room for FCS to FBS transfers...but I'm still on the fence about that.
Posted on 4/9/26 at 12:41 pm to madmaxvol
Chris Weinke scoffs at this thread.
Posted on 4/9/26 at 2:05 pm to travelgamer
quote:
Chris Weinke scoffs at this thread.
Monte Harrison scoffs at Chris Weinke.
Posted on 4/9/26 at 3:02 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
quote:
We can officially call this the Chamblis rule.
Yeah definitely not the Pavia rule or whatever kid just got his 9th year of eligibility
He must have hit a nerve. It is 100% the Chamblis rule $$$$$$$
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News