Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/19/20 at 7:11 pm to djsdawg
quote:how many deaths are you responsible for over your lifetime from not wearing a mask?
You may be causing a problem if you refuse to wear a mask.
I would bet you have killed an infant or two when you had an RSV strain your gave to an infant who later died
I would bet you have killed 5-10 elderly people when you passed the flu along to them
Interesting how it’s only til now you care about killing people by not wearing a mask
This post was edited on 5/19/20 at 7:12 pm
Posted on 5/19/20 at 7:11 pm to 3down10
quote:
don't
Good job. Being part of the problem
Posted on 5/19/20 at 7:13 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Can’t test People without tests, or can you?
But is that the fact, or is that what you are assuming?
Posted on 5/19/20 at 7:14 pm to 3down10
quote:
But is that the fact, or is that what you are assuming?
Test availability has been a widely accepted problem. Are you denying that?
Posted on 5/19/20 at 7:14 pm to lsupride87
quote:
how many deaths are you responsible for over your lifetime from not wearing a mask?
Hold on strawman, let’s stick to covid .
Posted on 5/19/20 at 7:15 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Good job. Being part of the problem
Well I either got it back in Feb, before everyone was wearing a mask and I am thus immune.
Or, I haven't gotten it at all, and literally nobody has died as a result of me not wearing a mask.
Posted on 5/19/20 at 7:15 pm to djsdawg
quote:Yes, you are full of shite
Test availability has been a widely accepted problem. Are you denying that?
I work at one of the largest healthcare systems in the south
Testing hasn’t been an issue in over a month
Posted on 5/19/20 at 7:16 pm to djsdawg
quote:Strawman? You said someone not wearing a mask is “part of the problem”
Hold on strawman, let’s stick to covid .
In just pointing out you were part of the problem will all respiratory virus deaths up to this point
Posted on 5/19/20 at 7:18 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Test availability has been a widely accepted problem. Are you denying that?
Again, is that the reason why or is that just what you are assuming?
Limited testing was a big part of why I was saying the mortality rates were bullshite. They were only testing the sick and those with major symptoms.
But limited testing doesn't mean no testing or that they didn't have testing for them. It also doesn't mean they did either. So I'm asking - is that the actual reason, or are you just claiming it is?
Posted on 5/19/20 at 7:20 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Hold on strawman, let’s stick to covid .
That's not a strawman.
Posted on 5/20/20 at 11:45 am to lsupride87
quote:
You said someone not wearing a mask is “part of the problem”
They are. Are you one of them? This is a pandemic of an poorly understood virus with no vaccine.
Posted on 5/20/20 at 11:48 am to lsupride87
quote:
Yes, you are full of shite
I work at one of the largest healthcare systems in the south
Testing hasn’t been an issue in over a month
You are admitting testing was an issue, which is the point I made, so how can I be FOS? Your conclusion makes zero sense.
Posted on 5/20/20 at 11:49 am to 3down10
quote:
Again, is that the reason why or is that just what you are assuming?
If testing was limited, it was clearly part of the problem. How could it not be? This is basic common sense. You can’t use what you don’t have.
Page 9 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News