Started By
Message
re: Mullen says Arkansas is a year or two ahead of MSU in rebuilding
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:16 pm to NIH
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:16 pm to NIH
Well apparently not only was Ole Miss making the Ark game close not only a moral victory for Ole Miss but Miss St. too. 
How bad do you have to be to live vicariously through Ole Miss.
How bad do you have to be to live vicariously through Ole Miss.
This post was edited on 11/13/11 at 4:18 pm
0
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:17 pm to NIH
quote:
hopefully the SECE retards knock each other around so we'll get the Music City Bowl.
Such lofty goals...
And here we are foolishly playing for division titles and BCS bowl games...
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:19 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
And here we are foolishly playing for division titles and BCS bowl games...
not bad for a one dimensional team who's Heisman caliber running back got hurt in the spring.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:20 pm to GeauxHogz
I never said we would have the right gameplan…. my point is our defense is good enough to stop ya'll (by stop I mean hold ya'll under 30 points where hopefully our offense can score enough points to have a chance) IF we have a good gameplan.
Your rush D did well against USCe without Lattimore and a Tennessee team which has had no rush O all year. Congrats… might want to use a few more examples to prove a point
quote:
Latarian
Your rush D did well against USCe without Lattimore and a Tennessee team which has had no rush O all year. Congrats… might want to use a few more examples to prove a point
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:20 pm to DaleDenton
Back to back bowls after a decade of Crooms/zombie Jackie is a good goal to have.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:21 pm to deltaland
quote:
Your rush D did well against USCe without Lattimore and a Tennessee team which has had no rush O all year. Congrats… might want to use a few more examples to prove a point
dude.
I am not talking about our rushing defense, I'm talking about our rushing offense. You tried to discount our last two rushing performances and I proved that statistically those two rushing defenses are better than MSU. It is then reasonable to assume we will have success on the ground against MSU as well.
Keep up.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:21 pm to Latarian
quote:
not bad for a one dimensional team who's Heisman caliber running back got hurt in the spring.
Yeah. CBMFNP was right, if you are satisfied with 10 win season and think that is enough for your playing career, go play for Ms. State.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:22 pm to DaleDenton
You aren't winning any SEC title as long as Miles & Saban are still coaching. Neither are we before you play that card.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:24 pm to NIH
quote:
You aren't winning any SEC title as long as Miles & Saban are still coaching
Petrino is 2-1 against Miles.
He has to prove he can beat Saban though I agree but to suggest we aren't winning any titles in the future because of him is a stretch.
This post was edited on 11/13/11 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:25 pm to Latarian
and has yet to finish with a better record than Miles.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:25 pm to NIH
quote:
You aren't winning any SEC title as long as Miles & Saban are still coaching. Neither are we before you play that card.
You can drop Miles from that list.
If we don't make it to Atlanta this year, we will have to beat Saban to guarantee a visit in the future.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:26 pm to DaleDenton
with Saban's secondaries that isn't exactly an easy accomplishment.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:26 pm to NIH
quote:
and has yet to finish with a better record than Miles.
finished ahead of him in the SEC standings last year, isn't that more relevant when discussing conference titles?
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:26 pm to NIH
quote:
with Saban's secondaries that isn't exactly an easy accomplishment.
Well, no shite, it isn't like Arkansas is the only team who is struggling to beat Bama here lately...
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:27 pm to NIH
quote:
with Saban's secondaries that isn't exactly an easy accomplishment.
no, it's not however last year proved that we can play with Bama, had Knile emerged as the #1 back in that game we could've easily won.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:30 pm to Latarian
quote:
no, it's not however last year proved that we can play with Bama, had Knile emerged as the #1 back in that game we could've easily won.
We will see next year as all the tough games will be at home.
Toughest road game will be @ Auburn.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:30 pm to Latarian
not when you lose to Bama & AU making that irrelevant.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:31 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
We will see next year as all the tough games will be at home.
and Bama loses pretty much it's entire defense and maybe Richardson.
If so there is no excuse to not beat Bama in Fayetteville next season.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:31 pm to NIH
quote:
not when you lose to Bama & AU & LSU & Arkansas for 3 consecutive years and counting making that irrelevant.
So Ms. State is irrelevant.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 4:32 pm to NIH
quote:
not when you lose to Bama & AU making that irrelevant
making what irrelevant? the fact we beat LSU head to head?
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News