Started By
Message
re: Most infamous games in SEC since 1992
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:15 pm to NYCAuburn
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:15 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
It's funny we had this thread a while back on the msb, same retorts from y'all, then someone suggest, why don't we send this to mike pereira, then low an behold same scenario happens, mike comments that play is called correctly, then silence.
Did you send in the interference call under the same circumstances on Steltz earlier in the game?
Or how about the David Irons 'play' in the end zone in the 1st half that I linked above?
0
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:15 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:Pretty sure the players in both scenarios would have the ability if they werent being "interfered" with
The players ability to make a play on the ball.
ETA: I dont even care about the game. Im not convinced we would have scored anyway, we were horrible in the redzone
This post was edited on 4/29/14 at 7:17 pm
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:17 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
The players ability to make a play on the ball
Of which, Doucet's was hindered.
You know, because he was held.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:17 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Pretty sure the players in both scenarios would have the ability if they werent being "interfered" with
Nope, LSU player could not have caught the ball and did not have the ability to make a play on the ball. Well unless he defies physics.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:17 pm to roadGator
quote:
Ark v UF 2009 were we whipped that arse. It should have been by more but whatever.
Look, I am not blaming yall, I know LSU has had help before. But that game was fixedPosted on 4/29/14 at 7:18 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:Never knew running forward to the ball defied physics. I 've been defying physics my whole life
Well unless he defies physics.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:19 pm to magildachunks
quote:
Of which, Doucet's was hindered.
Nope. Again unless he is able to change directions while in the air to be able move 2 yards closer to the ball, again all while in the air. Quite a feat if possible
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:19 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Never knew running forward to the ball defied physics
When was he doing that? Because it wasn't that play.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:20 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
The ball was uncatchable. Same thing happened in the nfl this year, Carolina game I believe.
According to the rule book, no pi.
Like I said, no straight face. Mike Pereira disagrees:
But what happens when the contact occurs before the tip? A closer look at the replay indicates that's what happened. If interference rules end when a defensive player touches the pass, doesn't that mean they are still enforced before that point?
That's what I thought, as did longtime NFL executive Mike Perreira, who was analyzing the game on Twitter. Pereira examined the play several times and concluded: "the interference clearly occurred before the tip."
Pereira acknowledged he was surprised by the decision. There are only two explanations here: Anderson couldn't find irrefutable evidence that the tip occurred before the contact, or he simply made a mistake. The number of camera angles available on Monday night makes the first possibility highly unlikely.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:20 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:He didnt during the play. Because he was being interfered with
When was he doing that? Because it wasn't that play.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:22 pm to JuiceTerry
Straight face, do you know the definition of PI?
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:22 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Like I said, no straight face.
Mike Pereira disagrees:
But what happens when the contact occurs before the tip? A closer look at the replay indicates that's what happened. If interference rules end when a defensive player touches the pass, doesn't that mean they are still enforced before that point?
That's what I thought, as did longtime NFL executive Mike Perreira, who was analyzing the game on Twitter. Pereira examined the play several times and concluded: "the interference clearly occurred before the tip."
Pereira acknowledged he was surprised by the decision. There are only two explanations here: Anderson couldn't find irrefutable evidence that the tip occurred before the contact, or he simply made a mistake. The number of camera angles available on Monday night makes the first possibility highly unlikely.
Notice how every other fanbase has been able to admit their team has received favors, but ole Aubbie is ALL INPosted on 4/29/14 at 7:23 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Nope. Again unless he is able to change directions while in the air to be able move 2 yards closer to the ball,
Ah yes, I see your point. Allow me to illustrate how this did, in fact, happen.
You see, when Doucet initially jumped up, he was jumping towards the ball. But then the force of the Auburn player running into him forced him to change directions in mid-air and move sideways, allowing the other Auburn defender to then have a chance at tipping the ball. Which was a fortunate circumstance as that was not his primary goal. He was trying to interfere with Doucet as well, but at the point of when Doucet was going to make the grab because he was jumping towards the ball.
That is indisputable.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:23 pm to lsupride87
quote:
He didnt during the play. Because he was being interfered with
Oh so he was going to land, change directions, move 2 yards, then catch the ball?
Seriously you can't be serious. How does one change directions in mid air and move 2 yards? I am interested in this new route running ability. Ole Gus can surely develop a play for this.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:26 pm to magildachunks
quote:
You see, when Doucet initially jumped up, he was jumping towards the ball.
Well you started off with a lie, let's see how this goes
quote:
But then the force of the Auburn player running into him forced him to change directions in mid-air and move sideways
Hopefully gets better
quote:
allowing the other Auburn defender to then have a chance at tipping the ball.
quote:
He was trying to interfere with Doucet as well, but at the point of when Doucet was going to make the grab because he was jumping towards the ball.
quote:
That is indisputable.
Well yes the alternate reality you've described is indisputable.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:26 pm to vandelay industries
quote:
damn, i forgot about the music city bowl....UT got jobbed in that one, for sure. combined with the LSU game earlier in the season, i'm surprised no one jumped off any rooftops...
If we hadn't been in so much shock it may well have happened.
Not only was Dooley an awful coach the few times he wasn't awful, he was the unluckiest coach I've ever seen. Absolutely astounding how bad his luck was - the entire time he was here analysts and tv announcers talked about how snake-bitten we were under him.
This post was edited on 4/29/14 at 7:30 pm
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:26 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:Maybe he would have touched the ball first if the AUBURN PLAYER DIDNT HIT HIM IN THE AIR FORCING HIM LEFT
Oh so he was going to land, change directions, move 2 yards, then catch the ball?
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:27 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Maybe he would have touched the ball first if the AUBURN PLAYER DIDNT HIT HIM IN THE AIR FORCING HIM LEFT
Lord it gets better.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:28 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Well yes the reality you've described is indisputable.
Thank you for conceding the point.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 7:29 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:When you are the one "genuis" yelling at the other 1000 "idiots", there is a good chance you are the idiot
Lord it gets better.
Page 11 of 23
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News