Started By
Message
Posted on 9/1/10 at 3:26 pm to hehatedrew
Neil is about to be on 620am in jackson
Posted on 9/1/10 at 3:30 pm to HawgAlude
quote:
The NCAA should just go ahead and/ or banish Hootie Dale to the D2 level where he belongs.
quote:
Sorry Ole Miss the NCAA does not approve of your under handed coaches behavior and/ or ethics.
That's heavy stuff Alude!
Posted on 9/1/10 at 3:45 pm to Porky
quote:
That's heavy stuff Alude!
Pretty normal coming from him. You would think he was mad at Nutt for something...
Posted on 9/1/10 at 3:53 pm to Cdawg
quote:
You compared the NCAA to government organizations, traffic laws, and now christmas.
You idiots aren't able to follow A+B=C logic, so I have to get creative.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 3:54 pm to OPR
quote:This has probably been asked but I can't go through 30 pages to find it. Were either of the "precedents" you cited prohibited from participating in athletics at their former schools? Also, the Paulus transfer has nothing to with this unless he at one time signed a national letter to play football. Paulus used up his basketball eligibility and to my knowledge, never played football at Duke. Paulus has nothing to do with the Masoli transfer waiver request.
There are several precedences ( Here and here) within the last few years to look at.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 3:56 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
Also, the Paulus transfer has nothing to with this unless he at one time signed a national letter to play football. Paulus used up his basketball eligibility and to my knowledge, never played football at Duke. Paulus has nothing to do with the Masoli transfer waiver request.
Really? Show me the part about "football" in the transfer waiver rule again?
This post was edited on 9/1/10 at 3:57 pm
Posted on 9/1/10 at 3:59 pm to hehatedrew
quote:
Pretty normal coming from him. You would think he was mad at Nutt for something...
I may be wrong ...but I'm thinking I can perhaps remember a time a few years back when Alude actually stood by Hootie.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 4:00 pm to OPR
quote:
You idiots aren't able to follow A+B=C logic, so I have to get creative.
You're the idiot trying to apply logic to the NCAA. And your anger over this is muddling your objective reasoning.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 4:02 pm to Porky
quote:
I may be wrong ...but I'm thinking I can perhaps remember a time a few years back when Alude actually stood by Hootie.
It's in bold
Posted on 9/1/10 at 4:02 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
Also, the Paulus transfer has nothing to with this unless he at one time signed a national letter to play football. Paulus used up his basketball eligibility and to my knowledge, never played football at Duke. Paulus has nothing to do with the Masoli transfer waiver request.
It doesn't matter if he played football at Duke, he was within the 5-year period of Duke scholarship, he still had to get a waiver to play another sport at another institution w/o sitting out a year
Posted on 9/1/10 at 4:03 pm to Cdawg
Sharks with Frickin Laser Beams....or Large, Illtempered Sea Bass.....which has nothing to do with this thread.
carry on.
carry on.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 4:05 pm to hehatedrew
quote:
I may be wrong
Like I said...
Posted on 9/1/10 at 4:11 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
This has probably been asked but I can't go through 30 pages to find it. Were either of the "precedents" you cited prohibited from participating in athletics at their former schools? Also, the Paulus transfer has nothing to with this unless he at one time signed a national letter to play football. Paulus used up his basketball eligibility and to my knowledge, never played football at Duke. Paulus has nothing to do with the Masoli transfer waiver request.
Kenneth Cooper dismissed from the La Tech basketball team last year and transferred to UAB for graduate school and was granted a waiver.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 4:28 pm to umrebel2009
They supposedly have about 10 of those they are going to use...
Posted on 9/1/10 at 4:32 pm to hehatedrew
NCAA subcommittee: "Uh oh they're coming with facts, put on the ear muffs!"
Posted on 9/1/10 at 4:39 pm to umrebel2009
Stewart Mandel gets it.
The NCAA has denied immediate eligibility to Jeremiah Masoli, apparently because his move to Ole Miss violates the spirit of the graduate transfer rule. Why did the NCAA let this play out for so long if it knew the whole time what would happen? Any thoughts on Masoli's chances on appeal?
-- Gabe Jones, Austin, Texas
I don't know why it took it so long, other than the fact that the NCAA's staff doesn't have some sort of Ole Miss quarterback hotline. It processes a lot of eligibility situations involving a lot of players in a lot of different sports at a lot of different schools. Unfortunately, had Masoli learned his fate earlier, he could have transferred down to an FCS school and played right away. I hope Ole Miss coaches or administrators didn't lead him to believe the waiver was a formality, and I hope he was made aware of all of his options.
Meanwhile, the NCAA -- which is often criticized for adhering so rigidly to its rulebook, oftentimes at the expense of common sense -- should be commended for taking the stance that it did. The graduate-transfer waiver that Masoli and Ole Miss were counting on was never intended as a free-agency option for someone who got kicked off his team. It's not a "rule," it's a "waiver" -- i.e., an exception, which, as the NCAA said in its statement, "... exists to provide relief to student-athletes who transfer for academic reasons to pursue graduate studies, not to avoid disciplinary measures at the previous university."
The Masoli situation made a lot of compliance officers and other college officials around the country queasy because of the precedent it might have created. I don't know what his chances are of winning an appeal, but based on the wording of the NCAA's statement, it would likely require some sort of convincing argument that he absolutely hopes to pursue a career in Parks and Recreation Management. While I'm sure Masoli is disappointed, he doesn't have much reasonable ground to complain. The NCAA isn't saying he can't play for Ole Miss. It flat out said he's entitled to a scholarship. It's just saying he has to wait a year to compete, like virtually every other FBS transfer.
Read more: LINK
The NCAA has denied immediate eligibility to Jeremiah Masoli, apparently because his move to Ole Miss violates the spirit of the graduate transfer rule. Why did the NCAA let this play out for so long if it knew the whole time what would happen? Any thoughts on Masoli's chances on appeal?
-- Gabe Jones, Austin, Texas
I don't know why it took it so long, other than the fact that the NCAA's staff doesn't have some sort of Ole Miss quarterback hotline. It processes a lot of eligibility situations involving a lot of players in a lot of different sports at a lot of different schools. Unfortunately, had Masoli learned his fate earlier, he could have transferred down to an FCS school and played right away. I hope Ole Miss coaches or administrators didn't lead him to believe the waiver was a formality, and I hope he was made aware of all of his options.
Meanwhile, the NCAA -- which is often criticized for adhering so rigidly to its rulebook, oftentimes at the expense of common sense -- should be commended for taking the stance that it did. The graduate-transfer waiver that Masoli and Ole Miss were counting on was never intended as a free-agency option for someone who got kicked off his team. It's not a "rule," it's a "waiver" -- i.e., an exception, which, as the NCAA said in its statement, "... exists to provide relief to student-athletes who transfer for academic reasons to pursue graduate studies, not to avoid disciplinary measures at the previous university."
The Masoli situation made a lot of compliance officers and other college officials around the country queasy because of the precedent it might have created. I don't know what his chances are of winning an appeal, but based on the wording of the NCAA's statement, it would likely require some sort of convincing argument that he absolutely hopes to pursue a career in Parks and Recreation Management. While I'm sure Masoli is disappointed, he doesn't have much reasonable ground to complain. The NCAA isn't saying he can't play for Ole Miss. It flat out said he's entitled to a scholarship. It's just saying he has to wait a year to compete, like virtually every other FBS transfer.
Read more: LINK
Posted on 9/1/10 at 4:43 pm to EasyB
So Kenneth Cooper got his waiver why?
Posted on 9/1/10 at 4:50 pm to umrebel2009
Someone please explain to the Ol Mis fans what a REQUEST is. Denied please move on. N. Stanley will be fine.
Popular
Back to top



0




