Started By
Message
re: Masoli denied...
Posted on 9/1/10 at 9:53 am to NawlinsTigah270
Posted on 9/1/10 at 9:53 am to NawlinsTigah270
quote:
Ole Miss is going to blow hard this year now. Pencil them in for last in the West. They deserve it for trying to bring in such a thug.
Wow... not gonna bite on that one
2
Posted on 9/1/10 at 10:02 am to Billy Mays
quote:
He said he will limit his college search to schools where he believes he can play immediately. The NCAA allows him just one year of college football eligibility. And if he returns to football, he said, he wants to play quarterback.
"When looking at schools, a chance to compete for the starting job is important," Paulus said. "With me only having an opportunity to play for one year, I think that the chance and the opportunity to compete and to compete at a high level is important. There is an opportunity to do that at Michigan. And that was one of the reasons I wanted to go up there and visit and learn all about it."
LINK
Paulus didn't even try to hide the fact that he was transferring specifically to get a shot at starting QB. So, other than the two misdemeanor convictions, how is this case any different?
I could give two shits about Ole Miss. However, I can't see how any fan in the SEC can be excited about this. The NCAA re-interpreting their own rules as they see fit to dole out punishment they deem necessary is not beneficial to ANY OF US.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 10:09 am to Billy Mays
quote:Wow, so defensive. I didn't even mention HDN and you go spouting off about him. I almost never post about him and intentionally steer away from threads about him.
Ploy = following NCAA rules??
I love how hogtards of your ilk spin everything negatively towards OM because of our head coach and nothing else. HDN is gone and you wanted it that way, so just go play in the mud and :jimp: over Bobby "13-12" Petrino
If you're tired of hearing all the bullshite that other Hog fans stir up then you might not want to instigate the ones who are over it.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 10:11 am to Aubie Spr96
This is beautiful, Ole Piss just can't admit it was a risky move that blew up. Poor red pants wearing count..
Posted on 9/1/10 at 10:16 am to Hog on the Hill
quote:
Wow, so defensive. I didn't even mention HDN and you go spouting off about him. I almost never post about him and intentionally steer away from threads about him.
You're the one who called the whole thing a "ploy" when it clearly isn't. You're the one calling us butthurt, whereas we have every right to be.
What is your reason for your flame towards OM?
I can't wait to hear your well-thought out answer
Posted on 9/1/10 at 10:17 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
Paulus didn't even try to hide the fact that he was transferring specifically to get a shot at starting QB. So, other than the two misdemeanor convictions, how is this case any different?
I could give two shits about Ole Miss. However, I can't see how any fan in the SEC can be excited about this. The NCAA re-interpreting their own rules as they see fit to dole out punishment they deem necessary is not beneficial to ANY OF US.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 10:36 am to Billy Mays
The guy doesn't deserve to play this year. The NCAA stated its policy on graduate student transfers back in 2009 (it's been posted several times already), which is that the rule is for players who are transferring for academically-motivated reasons. It is obvious to everyone that Masoli would never have transferred to OM if he hasn't been suspended from Oregon. You can go ahead and throw up that smoke screen if you want, but really, who are you kidding?
This is a really transparent attempt to let a repeat criminal continue playing DI football, even though he has done more than enough to forfeit that privilege. Ole Miss and Masoli put themselves in this tenuous position and have no one to blame but themselves.
This is a really transparent attempt to let a repeat criminal continue playing DI football, even though he has done more than enough to forfeit that privilege. Ole Miss and Masoli put themselves in this tenuous position and have no one to blame but themselves.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 10:40 am to Jaydeaux
quote:
This is beautiful, Ole Piss just can't admit it was a risky move that blew up. Poor red pants wearing count..
Don't let memphisplaya see you using the c-word,
But as far as your post is concerned, I am sorry you are butt-hurt and atleast this will make your lil purple and gold tushy fell better.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 10:43 am to fillmoregandt
quote:
Please explain how this is any different than Masoli's case
5th year seniors with only one year to play one. masoli has two years to play one.
as i understand it, the ncaa wants masoli to sit out a year because his transfer was athletically motivated, and he has two years of eligibility. same as how mallett had to sit out at AR after transferring from MI.
I know you may say 'well, masoli is in a one year grad program.' that may be true, but the NCAA sees through that ruse and thinks he should be held to the sit-a-year transfer rule because his eligibility allows it.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 11:03 am to Billy Mays
quote:
Wow... not gonna bite on that one
I tried at least
Posted on 9/1/10 at 11:24 am to WaveHog
No the NCAA's decision was for him to sit out this year because he was going to sit out this year at Oregon. (see the part about him transferiing to avoid disciplenary action). This is totally contradict in the case where the bball player was booted from LaTech yet transfered to UAB under the same rule and was declared immediately eligible
Posted on 9/1/10 at 11:39 am to fillmoregandt
but again, that bball player had only one year of eligibility left. masoli has two years left. you asked for a difference, i think that's a pretty clear one.
you gotta realize the NCAA's choice in this matter will be subjective by nature. there is an application process, decisions are made on a case-by-case basis. the rule is written that way, they're not going around the rule. cry 'PRECEDENT' all you want, but find me precedent for allowing the waiver of a FBS player who committed a felony, was booted from his team, and immediately played the next year elsewhere despite having two years of eligibility left.
you gotta realize the NCAA's choice in this matter will be subjective by nature. there is an application process, decisions are made on a case-by-case basis. the rule is written that way, they're not going around the rule. cry 'PRECEDENT' all you want, but find me precedent for allowing the waiver of a FBS player who committed a felony, was booted from his team, and immediately played the next year elsewhere despite having two years of eligibility left.
This post was edited on 9/1/10 at 11:40 am
Posted on 9/1/10 at 11:41 am to fillmoregandt
What kills me is all you Ole Miss fans running around looking up past cases for precedent and trying to apply logic to the NCAA and its internal workings. Open up your eyes. These guys are one step above the freakin Russian Mob. They don't care about anyone or anything. They make this crap up as they go, and they aren't accountable to anyone. You guys just happen to be their latest target. That is not a place you want to linger in.
As for a potential lawsuit, Ole Miss better leave that alone. Hell, the NCAA publicly threatened Memphis with more sanctions for just going through the established appeals process on their case. If Ole Miss tries to do an end around on the man, they will get wacked in the end. The NCAA will dig up or make up something. It will be bad, too. They just need to move on. It isn't fair. Nothing with the NCAA is. But it is what it is, and that's all there is.
As for a potential lawsuit, Ole Miss better leave that alone. Hell, the NCAA publicly threatened Memphis with more sanctions for just going through the established appeals process on their case. If Ole Miss tries to do an end around on the man, they will get wacked in the end. The NCAA will dig up or make up something. It will be bad, too. They just need to move on. It isn't fair. Nothing with the NCAA is. But it is what it is, and that's all there is.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 11:45 am to WaveHog
The problem isn't with the NCAA. The problem exists because there was not enough experience or depth at quarterback. With prior knowledge of not having Snead, potential injuries, and players leaving, why did this happen? Can someone tell me why in the friggin hell didn't someone bring in an experienced juco QB (or perhaps five with the class of 37) before something like this occurred? I'm talking about someone who can play. I'm not talking about the type that needs last minute business with the business that's "in the business of helping people" either. I'm talking about zero extra baggage. 
This post was edited on 9/1/10 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:07 pm to Porky
quote:
The problem isn't with the NCAA. The problem exists because there was not enough experience or depth at quarterback. With prior knowledge of not having Snead, potential injuries, and players leaving, why did this happen? Left with this kind of depth and inexperience, in the name of preventative maintenance, can someone tell me why in the friggin hell didn't someone bring in an experienced juco QB (or perhaps five) before something like this occurred? I'm talking about someone who can play. I'm not talking about the type that needs help from the business that's "in the business of helping people" either. I'm talking about zero extra baggage.
and you know these same ole miss fans crying about it were the same people that more than likely bashed miles for the zach lee situation and not having a backup plan
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:16 pm to lsufball19
Did Miles play QB in college?
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:18 pm to lsufball19
Whats funny is that the appeal is going to get denied too, Masoli will dropout, and then Nutt will look like a fool again.
What a great way to start the season.
What a great way to start the season.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:19 pm to lsufball19
quote:
and you know these same ole miss fans crying about it were the same people that more than likely bashed miles for the zach lee situation and not having a backup plan
Not that I can recall... in all seriousness, LSU isn't really brought up that much on the SEC Rant.
I doubt Miles would've let Garrett go in hindsight strictly for depth purposes, but if he wasn't good enough to play, then so be it.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:20 pm to Porky
quote:
Did Miles play QB in college?
no, why?
Page 19 of 32
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News