Started By
Message
re: LSU will beat Arky by two TD's
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:03 pm to tiger81
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:03 pm to tiger81
quote:
LSU wins, Pig offense is what our D is designed for. All blitzes in play, immobile QB. Mullet head gets picked two or three times.
dear sweet baby thanksgiving jesus, please let lsu blitz early and often.
you guys will get toasted in the flats by DJ, Knile, and Wingo.
why do you think teams stopped blitzing us so much? because mallett finally figured out how to dump the ball off when he was about to get Fairleyed.
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:05 pm to YumYum Sauce
inferiority complex is strong in this thread
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:05 pm to SLC
quote:
Took Draconian Sanctions's bet. 2 week ban bet.
Ahh. Good on you!
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconcool.gif)
Sorry I won't be seeing you for awhile then!
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Icongeauxtigers.png)
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:08 pm to SLC
I think they do. Yates and McElroy both had decent games against LSU. I know two of Yates's TDs came late but I don't think that really matters.
I think a lot of the LSU fans arguing that their D is so great vs pro-style offenses are kind of reaching... it's not like they've faced very many good pro-style offenses, and in the games they did (Alabama and UNC), they gave up an average of 22.5 points. Neither Alabama nor UNC have offenses as good as ours.
That's doesn't mean that LSU won't do well against our offense, but I don't think it's very clear that LSU is great against good pro-style offenses.
I think a lot of the LSU fans arguing that their D is so great vs pro-style offenses are kind of reaching... it's not like they've faced very many good pro-style offenses, and in the games they did (Alabama and UNC), they gave up an average of 22.5 points. Neither Alabama nor UNC have offenses as good as ours.
That's doesn't mean that LSU won't do well against our offense, but I don't think it's very clear that LSU is great against good pro-style offenses.
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:08 pm to Rohan2Reed
quote:
inferiority complex is strong in this thread
not really.
it is hard to put up with the sense of entitlement that the traditional powers have in the SEC. we obviously aren't a traditional power, but it gets real old when the lsu/bama types act like they will dominate just because of who they are. things are changing in the league.
if you actually look at this game from a non-homer point of view, it is very, very close.
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:20 pm to YumYum Sauce
quote:
it is hard to put up with the sense of entitlement that the traditional powers have in the SEC.
maybe Alabama fans, but LSU fans don't have a sense of entitlement. we just look at the facts when it comes to comparing programs. and looking at the recent (and historic for that matter) accomplishments of LSU versus those of Arkansas.. the reality is LSU is pretty far ahead of the Hogs.
quote:
we obviously aren't a traditional power, but it gets real old when the lsu/bama types act like they will dominate just because of who they are.
well don't they? i recall Alabama beating Arky in your own house.
quote:
things are changing in the league.
wrong. State, USCe, Old Miss, Arky are flashes in the pan. Bama, LSU and Florida aren't going anywhere.
quote:
if you actually look at this game from a non-homer point of view, it is very, very close.
oh i agree. I don't believe LSU or Arky can win this game by double digit numbers. but as far as Arkansas blowing out LSU (as many Hog fans seem to think they will).. i just don't see it happening.
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:21 pm to Hog on the Hill
quote:
but I don't think it's very clear that LSU is great against good pro-style offenses.
How about the fact that we haven't lost to a pro-style offense all year? How does that fact grab ya?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Icongeauxtigers.png)
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:42 pm to bobandy
quote:
Peterson will probably be on Cobi Hamilton who took over when Childs went down
Childs being out will hurt a lot.
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:44 pm to TxTiger82
It hasn't hurt yet, at least in terms of production.
This post was edited on 11/25/10 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:44 pm to Rohan2Reed
quote:
inferiority complex is strong in this thread
yep
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:48 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
Childs being out will hurt a lot.
really?
don't think we missed him much against South Carolina or State...we have plenty of receivers
you're talking about QB/WR university here
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:49 pm to Hog on the Hill
quote:
It hasn't hurt yet, at least in terms of production.
Yes it has. Arkansas was averaging closer to 400 yards passing per game before Childs was hurt.
Now they average closer to 300. That is a 100 yard per game hit.
I am basing this on the South Carolina and Miss. State games. I am ignoring the UTEP game because....well....it is UTEP.
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:50 pm to arkiebrian
quote:
really?
don't think we missed him much against South Carolina or State...we have plenty of receivers
You certainly did. Mallett's numbers have dropped almost 100 yards per game.
That is huge.
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:52 pm to arkiebrian
quote:
you're talking about QB/WR university here
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
You guys have one top flight QB and now you're "QB U?" Give me a break.
Same goes for the receivers. Childs is a beast. The rest are just pretty good, made better by Mallett.
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:52 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
You certainly did. Mallett's numbers have dropped almost 100 yards per game. That is huge.
wrong!
we have developed a running game and aren't so dependent on the pass any more
haven't heard of Knile Davis? you'll know him well Saturday
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:52 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
You certainly did. Mallett's numbers have dropped almost 100 yards per game.
That is huge.
Knile Davis' numbers have increased.
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:54 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Knile Davis' numbers have increased.
This proves my point actually. Without Childs you are not even trying to pass it as much. It has clearly affected your passing production.
Fortunately for Arkansas, Davis has been able to step in and supply the missing yards. I'm not sure he can do that against LSU's run D.
This was discussed at length in this thread last night. With the exception of Auburn and Ole Miss, both of whom run spread offenses with mobile QBs....NO team has been able to run on us very effectively.
Arkansas won't, either.
Posted on 11/25/10 at 12:59 pm to TxTiger82
South Carolina had the best run D in the league too.
Posted on 11/25/10 at 1:03 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
South Carolina had the best run D in the league too.
lets not forget how we shut down Lattimore too
this game was played in Columbia
Posted on 11/25/10 at 1:09 pm to arkiebrian
Arkansas has not faced a defense this complete all year long.
South Carolina has the worst pass defense in the league.
Alabama has the worst pass rush in the league.
Mississippi State is around the middle to lower half in rush, pass, and sacks by defense.
LSU is at or near the top in pretty much every defensive stat there is.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Icongeauxtigers.png)
South Carolina has the worst pass defense in the league.
Alabama has the worst pass rush in the league.
Mississippi State is around the middle to lower half in rush, pass, and sacks by defense.
LSU is at or near the top in pretty much every defensive stat there is.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Icongeauxtigers.png)
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)