re: LSU or Ole Miss, who will field the better team?

quote:

---

If a team returns more than they're automatically going to win the next season!

---

It's not the fact we are returning more. It's the fact we are returning everyone, while y'all lost everyone on offense and your DL. It's fine. I can't wait to troll the frick out of all you incompetent fricks.

quote:

---

Your players with less experience were on the bench for a reason, while the guys who were ahead of them got beat...by our second string. The stats are there. If you can come up with a rebuttal to what I post please do. But stop saying stats are stupid and have no rebuttal. The question is simple: LSU or Ole Miss...I gave proof, you keep giving ignorance.

---

Well your first string lost to MSU so maybe they are on the bench for no reason.

And people definitely can't improve over time. I mean if you didn't start since you were a freshmen no way you will ever be better than someone who played who was older.

quote:

---

Well, everybody should just hand the trophy over to Kentucky. They got a boatload of starters coming back

---

You're an idiot. Did UK beat y'all last year? No. Did we beat y'all last year? Yes.

quote:

---

It's the fact we are returning everyone, while y'all lost everyone on offense and your DL. It's fine. I can't wait to troll the frick out of all you incompetent fricks.

---

This is where you are getting confused, We don't lose players, we reload.

quote:

---

If the players save LF were as talented as those drafted they would have a bigger impact like Mills did last year.

---

Prease to Engrish.

"If the players save LF were as talented"

By saying "players were", I'm assuming you're talking about last year - but then you say, "save LF" (assuming you mean Leonard Fournette) which is implying that either LF was on the team last year, or you aren't actually talking about last year...

"...were as talented as those drafted they would have a bigger impact like Mills did last year."

I'm assuming you meant to say, "would have HAD" if you are talking about last year. But again, it looks like you're talking about this year with that statement.

So it looks to me like what you're trying to say is that if there were players on the bench that were as talented as Beckham, Landry, Hill and Mettenberger, then those players would have had a bigger impact on last season. And then you use one single example to try to prove your point. I'm sorry, but it is still an invalid assumption on your part, and I can't find any other logical interpretation of your text that would provide the information required to make your initial assumption valid.

You would have to have some objective measure of talent to be able to compare LSU's 2014 offensive skill position talent to that of 2013. You have failed to provide this objective measure.

...not to mention that you are completely ignoring the OL.

So, yeah, I'm going to have to go with "troll" here.

You ever notice the electrical charge a shiny hook generates when it reacts with the fillings in your teeth?

Well shite, gonna go buy me one dem der stingray players and remember da guud ole days

So these players stats are low because they didn't get as much playing time and that means they're "garbage" as I recall you saying? I guess mettenburger was garbage because he didn't start over Lee/Jefferson? Just admit your logic is flawed and you can seem to reason very well because you are blinded by your overwhelming homerism. I don't think many people outside of Ole Miss fans would agree with you.

quote:

---

Ole Miss is proven

---

That's right, Ole Miss is a proven, 8-5 Music City Bowl champion from 2013.

LSU is a proven, 10-3 Outback Bowl Winner.

Who will field the better team in 2014? LSU, based on proven depth and incoming talent.

Two years in a row of your whole team declaring for the draft will catch up to you this year.