Started By
Message

re: LSU kicker

Posted on 11/25/18 at 5:01 pm to
Posted by AstroAg17
Member since Oct 2015
754 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 5:01 pm to
The only call I disagreed with was the PI at the end on Greedy. I don’t like the catch rules but I think the sternberger incomplete pass was consistent with the rules and other rulings I’ve seen in the past.

Any plays in particular other than those?
Posted by Tiger Tracker
Austin,TX
Member since Nov 2015
7266 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

If the breaks had to fall our way to do it, so be it.


Thank you for at least being honest enough to say the officiating did push you over the edge.

LSU by no means played their best game and I am not going to defend that aspect of the game. I am not one of the LSU conspiracy theorist fans at all and I truly hate people who blame officiating as the reason their team lost, but I'll be damned if I wasn't one of those people watching the game last night. first time it's ever happened to me.

It doesn't change the W-L column so all I can say is I hope we fricking put them in their place next year. Not mad at yall for being happy about the win. I would be celebrating too if I was in your position regardless of what it took to get there
Posted by Tiger Tracker
Austin,TX
Member since Nov 2015
7266 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

Any plays in particular other than those?


Not necessarily all bad calls but bad breaks for LSU on the other calls. The issue is the PI essentially gave you guys a 2nd chance to win. So it was a pretty significant one.
Posted by BQAG02
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2011
830 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 7:43 pm to
I will thoroughly enjoy it. Timing doesn’t matter - 3 points is 3 points. The only call I will admit was questionable/favorable for us was a PI call on in one of the OTs. That one could have been a no-call. Other than that, not sure what you guys are still bitching about.
Posted by AUX3
Member since Dec 2010
3848 posts
Posted on 11/25/18 at 7:50 pm to
I thought you could only have 4 guys in the backfield on any formation and that you had to at least 4 in the backfield. They either had 2 or 6 based on the spike play. Some dude earlier in thread said that was fine, I didn’t find it in his link
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter