Started By
Message
re: LSU loses to Carolina but wins out after that
Posted on 10/10/12 at 1:06 pm to WG_Dawg
Posted on 10/10/12 at 1:06 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
That has NEVER been the case dude. It starts with SEC record (overall) compared to others in your division and then works its way down from there. Bama would still go.
So wait a minute. LSU has to play UF and USCe while Bama gets to beat up on UT and Mizzou and they actually use those games to determine which team in the West is better?
3
Posted on 10/10/12 at 1:07 pm to wadewilson
quote:
Championship teams aren't determined by division record?
No, and never have been ever.
And still not sure if this is a joke..
Posted on 10/10/12 at 1:10 pm to WG_Dawg
It's been awhile since a team has come out of the West with a loss.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 1:13 pm to wadewilson
quote:
You beat every team in the west, you win the west, right?
:notsureifserious:
Posted on 10/10/12 at 1:16 pm to JonTheTigerFan
quote:
So wait a minute. LSU has to play UF and USCe while Bama gets to beat up on UT and Mizzou and they actually use those games to determine which team in the West is better?
Before long these guys are gonna want BCS rankings to determine the winner of the divisions. To hell with win loss records
Posted on 10/10/12 at 1:18 pm to Wishnitwas1998
quote:
Before long these guys are gonna want BCS rankings to determine the winner of the divisions. To hell with win loss records
It's almost like College Football makes up these rules as they go....
Posted on 10/10/12 at 1:19 pm to Wishnitwas1998
I really hope not. I don't like the idea of outsiders having an influence in our conference process. Fortunately the BCS ranking part of the tiebreaker has never been used.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 1:25 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
Fortunately the BCS ranking part of the tiebreaker has never been used.
yes it has, in 2003. UGA/UF/UT all finished with 2 conference losses and all the tiebreakers were even. If memory serves, the old rulebook had the very last tiebreaker as a vote by league presidents, but the SEC realized that would be a shitstorm so ammended the rules to have the last and final tiebreaker use the BCS standings. The last place BCS team (in that case, UF) is thrown out, then having a head to head between the other 2. UGA beat UT that year so we won the east. It was crazy, because we essentially had to beat Georgia tech to win the east lol.
There is also some other provision, like if all 3 teams are within a certain number of spots of each other, it just goes to the highest ranked.
This post was edited on 10/10/12 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 10/10/12 at 1:26 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
It would never happen but I guess that's the only thing that would make the guy I was quoting happy...............until Bama won the west by being ranked higher then he would come up with some other shite
I thought I remembered having it come down to the BCS between UT/UF/UGA before but couldn't remember when
quote:
yes it has,
I thought I remembered having it come down to the BCS between UT/UF/UGA before but couldn't remember when
This post was edited on 10/10/12 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 10/10/12 at 1:28 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
yes it has, in 2003. UGA/UF/UT all finished with 2 conference losses and all the tiebreakers were even. If memory serves, the old rulebook had the very last tiebreaker as a vote by league presidents, but the SEC realized that would be a shitstorm so ammended the rules to have the last and final tiebreaker use the BCS standings.
I forgot about this, lemme google to check out.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 1:28 pm to GhostBuster6
quote:
and Alabama wraps up another national championship..So that would be back to back seasons of beating us in the regular season but we still won a pair of national championships...that is freakin crazy
DEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Posted on 10/10/12 at 1:32 pm to wadewilson
quote:
If we have losses to SC and Florida, but win every other game, that means we beat every single team in the west.
You beat every team in the west, you win the west, right?
Wait a minute wait a minute....
I think he's on to something here, guys.....
Posted on 10/10/12 at 1:36 pm to wadewilson
quote:
It's been awhile since a team has come out of the West with a loss.
USC went 5-0 versus the SEC East last year.....UGA went 4-1 vs East opponents, including a loss to us...
This post was edited on 10/10/12 at 1:37 pm
Posted on 10/10/12 at 1:43 pm to ConwayGamecock
I didn't know.
I don't watch much college football.
I don't watch much college football.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 2:16 pm to wadewilson
quote:
If LSU loses to South Carolina and wins out..............we win the west and go to the SEC Championship again.
How so? LSU would have two conference losses and Bama only one.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 2:20 pm to JonTheTigerFan
quote:
LSU has to play UF and USCe while Bama gets to beat up on UT and Mizzou and they actually use those games to determine which team in the West is better?
well Daddy gets what he wants in the SEC broseph, where you been?
Posted on 10/10/12 at 2:22 pm to scrooster
I thought it was determined by division record. I have been corrected.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 2:23 pm to wadewilson
quote:
I don't watch much college football.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 2:24 pm to roadGator
quote:
LSU is so awesome they are going to win and lose?
Only Dooley is good enough to do that.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 2:25 pm to wadewilson
quote:
If we have losses to SC and Florida, but win every other game, that means we beat every single team in the west.
You beat every team in the west, you win the west, right?
My apologies SEC fans, this guy doesn't know shite about football.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News