Started By
Message
Posted on 10/29/25 at 8:46 am to Mo Jeaux
You're not going to get a call from the donor who paid it. It was 27 mil. LSU invoked a morality clause. It's better for both parties. Especially BK.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 8:46 am to That LSU Guy
quote:Well, it is defined in the contract.
Are you stupid or do you just not know what "qualifying" employment means.
quote:All he is required to do is to exercise “due diligence” to find such employment. That ain’t much. it certainly does not require him to see employment at a similar level of compensation.
football-related employment, whether intercollegiate or professional, including coaching, administration or media
This post was edited on 10/29/25 at 8:58 am
Posted on 10/29/25 at 8:49 am to kajunman
quote:
You're not going to get a call from the donor who paid it.
Neither are you, so how do you know it’s a done deal?
quote:
LSU invoked a morality clause.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 8:55 am to kajunman
So what morality clause did they “invoke”? How do you know that they did so? If they did, why didn’t they use it for its intended purpose?
Posted on 10/29/25 at 8:58 am to Mo Jeaux
See 27 mil. That's your answer.
quote:
How do you know that they did so?
Posted on 10/29/25 at 9:00 am to generalgator87
Oh boy, the obsession with Brian Kelly and how expensive all this is going to be which is clearly of no concern to LSU at the moment. Don’t you guys have anything better to do with your time?
Posted on 10/29/25 at 9:01 am to kajunman
quote:I am not aware of any confirmation that such a settlement took place. Even if it did, there are any number of potential explanations.
See 27 mil
It would certainly be reasonable for BK to accept a lump sum today, thereby relieving himself of the burdens of the mitigation clause. He could then sign on for another coaching gig without having to give any of it back to LSU.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 9:04 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:Ane he gets it up front. No payments for 5 years or so. Everything you said are correct. It's as much of a clean break for him as it is for LSU. Both parties win a little and lose a little. Kind of like what most fair judgments represent.
It would certainly be reasonable for BK to accept a lump sum today, thereby relieving himself of the burdens of the mitigation clause. He could then sign on for another coaching gig without having to give any of it back to LSU.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 9:09 am to kajunman
quote:
See 27 mil. That's your answer.
The figure that hasn’t been confirmed? Ok.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 9:10 am to kajunman
quote:
Ane he gets it up front. No payments for 5 years or so. Everything you said are correct. It's as much of a clean break for him as it is for LSU. Both parties win a little and lose a little. Kind of like what most fair judgments represent.
You’re missing the morality clause piece here though.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 9:17 am to kajunman
quote:
Nope. That was you.
No, you claimed they invoked it. I asked how. You haven’t answered. You also haven’t answered how you know the $27mm was confirmed.
Are you going to answer?
Posted on 10/29/25 at 9:20 am to Mo Jeaux
LOL, you're desperate to not be wrong. I can't help you. Maybe one day you will figure it out. I doubt it though.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 9:20 am to kajunman
quote:
LOL, you're desperate to not be wrong. I can't help you. Maybe one day you will figure it out. I doubt it though.
So you’ve got nothing. I get it.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 9:23 am to generalgator87
cry more
Y'all are below us on the coaching vacancy pecking order.
Y'all are below us on the coaching vacancy pecking order.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 9:23 am to Mo Jeaux
I'm disappointed in you. I thought you had more.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 9:23 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:it’s not true.
Has this been confirmed?
Posted on 10/29/25 at 9:25 am to kajunman
quote:
I'm disappointed in you. I thought you had more.
You made the claims here, homey. You were asked to provide some explanation or confirmation. You haven’t.
Popular
Back to top


2


