Started By
Message
re: It’s Thursday and Auburn is still whining about last Saturday
Posted on 9/25/25 at 8:55 pm to RollingwiththeTide
Posted on 9/25/25 at 8:55 pm to RollingwiththeTide
quote:
That’s getting technical. What OU did is no worse than a reverse, flea flicker, or fumblerooski.
The rule was penned into the rulebook before last weekend. It's supposed to be technical. If you don't get that then I don't know what to tell you.
A flea flicker is not illegal.
2
Posted on 9/25/25 at 8:56 pm to AHM21
Thanks for keeping posted. Bams are dependable if for nothing else than being eaten up with concern about little brother.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 8:57 pm to jangalang
You may keep this going forever. That is a win/win for you.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 8:57 pm to Jdillard343434
quote:
Yeah where malzan go
To the team that’s going to run UF out of their own stadium on November 29.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 8:57 pm to captdalton
quote:
You may keep this going forever.
Yes I can.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 9:00 pm to jangalang
quote:
Yes I can.
I think we should keep this thread alive. Remind people how many mongoloids on this message board don’t understand the basic substitution rules of football.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 9:02 pm to AUTubaHerd
Wonder how long OU bitches when the SEC fricks them royal.....
Posted on 9/25/25 at 9:02 pm to AUTubaHerd
This is turning into was there a second gunman on the grassy knoll? type situation. And I love it.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 9:03 pm to AUTubaHerd
I'm for it.
BUT BUT BUT
yall did the hidden trick! Yall bad!
BUT BUT BUT
yall did the hidden trick! Yall bad!
Posted on 9/25/25 at 9:06 pm to jangalang
It’s been almost a week since that game was played. In that span of time I have heard this play was both legal and illegal. I don’t know what is what and I don’t really think anyone else does either. You would think if anyone knew the SEC would but how many plays have we watched them butcher over the past few years? To be honest I thought the play was a legal play. As the sport of the game goes it’s being no more deceptive than any other trick play. Why it would be illegal should be the controversy. If someone on defense or on the sidelines would have counted the OU players then we wouldn’t be talking about this.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 9:07 pm to SquarePizzaRebel
quote:
This is turning into was there a second gunman on the grassy knoll? type situation. And I love it.
Except the conspiracy theorists are the ones saying a player didn’t turn around to face the other endzone while meandering to his own sideline, simultaneously undoing his gloves and chin strap.
Everyone else acknowledges it was an illegal play that an incompetent officiating crew didn’t recognize.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 9:08 pm to RollingwiththeTide
Posted on 9/25/25 at 9:08 pm to SquarePizzaRebel
quote:
This is turning into was there a second gunman on the grassy knoll? type situation. And I love it.
Except the police have video evidence and clearly identified the perpetrator. The Attorney General is pissed that Barney Fife fricked up the paperwork.
Your analogy sucks.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 9:12 pm to AUTubaHerd
quote:If you want a serious football discussion, this may not be the forum for you.
Remind people how many mongoloids on this message board don’t understand the basic substitution rules of football.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 9:13 pm to jangalang
quote:
He proved intent. You're welcome..
Yes we intended to run that play
We intended to run all the other plays too.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 9:18 pm to jangalang
Let me ask you a fair question. Were you this outraged a few years ago when the refs butchered the Bo Nix spike that was actually a lateral and cost Arky the game?
Posted on 9/25/25 at 9:20 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:And still cry like the little bitches they are (looking at you rollingwiththetide) that the tying TD pass from Marshall was illegal.
bama fans still say Chris Davis stepped out of bounds on the Kick Six.
This post was edited on 9/25/25 at 9:22 pm
Posted on 9/25/25 at 9:20 pm to RollingwiththeTide
quote:
lateral
Not to judge, I make my share of mistakes, please fix this.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 9:20 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
Yes we intended to run that play We intended to run all the other plays too.
You intended to run a play that the SEC not only ruled illegal before the season, but communicated to the coaches that it was a point of emphasis to eliminate?
Posted on 9/25/25 at 9:22 pm to RollingwiththeTide
quote:
Let me ask you a fair question. Were you this outraged a few years ago when the refs butchered the Bo Nix spike that was actually a lateral and cost Arky the game?
Were lateral passes an SEC officiating point of emphasis procedure penalty or was that an officiating mistake in the heat of the moment?
Page 7 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News