re: Is UGA Still Considered One Of The SEC's 'Bluebloods'?

quote:

---

1 Alabama
2 Notre Dame (IN)
3 Southern California
4 Oklahoma
5 Michigan
6 Ohio St.
7 Texas
8 Nebraska
9 Louisiana St.
10 Tennessee
11 Georgia
12 Penn St.
13 Miami (FL)
14 Florida
15 Georgia Tech
16 Auburn (AL)
17 Minnesota
18 Pittsburgh (PA)
19 Washington
20 Texas A&M
21 Florida St.
22 Arkansas
23 UCLA
24 Michigan St.
25 Illinois

---

Georgia needs a NC in the next 10 years.

But we still have the third most SECC's behind Tennessee (1 behind) and Alabama (no idea, what does the 13th-16th grade in west Alabama have now, 23?) and the third best winning % in the conference.

It'd take 10 years of unmitigated arse sucking (1990's-esque) from UGA and the rest of the programs to perform at the same level as they did in the 2000's.

Florida and Alabama could possibly do it, Florida particularly as they have the inherent advantages enjoyed over the last 20 years. Alabama will be good as long as Saban is there, but they'll likely troll around roughly where they've been since Bear Bryant went to the great Golden Flake plant in the sky. LSU has been several standard dev's above their performance across program history the last decade - pretty unlikely that continues. History has shown no one stays on the tank or in the bowl of the shitter too terribly long.

In layman's terms: UGA should be fine.