Started By
Message
re: Is this the year Kentucky end 24 game losing streak against Florida?
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:26 pm to shaneomac1
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:26 pm to shaneomac1
quote:
lmao @ kentucky beating florida... give yourself a pinch and wake the f^&* up..
It's pretty shitty how Florida basically gets two automatic wins in the SEC by playing Kentucky and Vandy every year. That's the only justification for expansion IMO. If Texas A&M is invited and goes to the SEC West, a much better program like an Auburn or Florida State will probably go to the SEC East. The gap between the two divisions would get significantly smaller.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:27 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
That was probably the worst I've ever felt during or after a game. It was just brutal. Even worse than the Bluegrass miracle or anything.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:28 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
automatic wins
Not quite, buddy. The game has been close most years. 2009 and 2010 were the only recent games where we just played like dog shite.
quote:
Auburn or Florida State will probably go to the SEC East
We have a winning record against FSU (beat them as recently as 07), and we just beat Auburn in 2009.
This post was edited on 8/23/11 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:29 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
It's pretty shitty how Florida basically gets two automatic wins in the SEC by playing Kentucky and Vandy every year.

Like bama doesn't typically get to beat up on ole miss and miss state?
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:32 pm to busey
quote:damn
Even worse than the Bluegrass miracle or anything.
It might've even been 2007.....can't remember. I vividly remember watching that game (even though I can't remember the year

Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:34 pm to busey
24 consecutive wins against Kentucky and 22 consecutive wins against Vandy is more than enough reason to call the two games automatic wins for UF. That's not to mention the fact that UF is also 17-2 against South Carolina since 1992. There isn't a single team in the SEC West that UF has dominated in that kind of fashion.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:36 pm to Bench McElroy
Some teams tend to play better in cross divisional games. I don't know why.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:38 pm to busey
quote:
lmao @ kentucky beating florida... give yourself a pinch and wake the f^&* up..
Wow, was that necessary? The few Gator fans on here try to keep it as non-douche as possible. It looks like you are in a hurry to frick that up.

Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:38 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
There isn't a single team in the SEC West that UF has dominated in that kind of fashion.
Arky has never beat Florida......EVER
I know it's a smaller sample size, but that's still similar "domination fashion"

poor little piggies, if only reggie fish never existed......
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:38 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Like bama doesn't typically get to beat up on ole miss and miss state?
Ole Miss: 3-3 record against Florida since 1992
Mississippi State: 4-4 record against Florida since 1992
vs.
Kentucky: 0-19 record against Florida since 1992
Vanderbilt: 0-19 record against Florida since 1992
South Carolina: 2-17 record against Florida since 1992
I don't think it's a reach to say that the Mississippi schools have been significantly more competitive than Kentucky, Vanderbilt and South Carolina since 1992.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:38 pm to Crompdaddy8
quote:
Is this the year Kentucky end 24 game losing streak against Florida?
No.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:41 pm to Crompdaddy8
Kentucky should be aweful this year.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:41 pm to Bench McElroy
You didn't even address the question. He said Bama, not Florida.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:41 pm to Rebelgator
Sorry kitties, but I think is highly unlikely you all beat us. This is your last chance in a while though.
It was the 2008 game that was really painful to watch. All those blocked punts/kicks was brutal. I felt bad.
It was the 2008 game that was really painful to watch. All those blocked punts/kicks was brutal. I felt bad.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:42 pm to Al Bundy Bulldog
We won't be awful. We'll do alright. 6-6. Par for the course.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:43 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
I don't think it's a reach to say that the Mississippi schools have been significantly more competitive than Kentucky, Vanderbilt and South Carolina since 1992.
Sigh, is this going to turn into another "if UF was in the west they would lose more games" fail thread? :beatdeadhorse:
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:43 pm to Bench McElroy
But you're not comparing apples to apples. You're comparing west teams that have played a handful of times against UF to teams they play every year. The comparison that I said, that actually makes sense, is the big boys in the west getting to play the perennially bad mississippi schools every year since 1992.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:44 pm to Bench McElroy
I would venture to say it also has a lot to do with how familiar you are with your opponents. Dominant East and West teams probably fare better against their same division due to the fact you play them each and every year and the games tend to be a little more important in terms of getting to the SECCG.
Maybe I'm wrong, and I am surely too lazy to look up the stats.
Maybe I'm wrong, and I am surely too lazy to look up the stats.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:44 pm to WG_Dawg
Exactly. UK generally does well against the West schools. Ole Miss and State do well against the East schools. I don't know why, but that's the way it is.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 1:46 pm to busey
I agree, why would KY be so competitive against LSU?
Popular
Back to top
