Started By
Message

Is it really true that 10 of Bamas 13 claimed NC are split titles?
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:26 am
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:26 am
That is what a writer in the Birmingham News stated. I knew there were some bogus ones like where Bama was ranked 20th in one poll but NC in another. But I didnt know they had only half of 10 of the 13 they claim. Interesting.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:28 am to Smash Mouth Tider
You're obsessed. And no.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:30 am to StPeteLSU

This post was edited on 12/6/11 at 6:32 am
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:32 am to StPeteLSU
There's a bunch... 10 seems high but could be right. I'm pretty sure that none of their pre Bryant championships were unanimous. And off top of my head I also know that their 73' and 78' titles are also split. Ironically, they lost to the other title winner in both of those seasons.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:34 am to StPeteLSU
No denying that Bama's history is second to none, but their fans use of 13 is laughable. Credit where credit is due, they have 6 to 8 very credible NC. I say 6 if you want to really be prickish about it, but 8 is the number if you ask me. That alone is pretty damn sweet.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:34 am to Smash Mouth Tider
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:38 am to MsGulfCoastTigerFan
quote:
No denying that Bama's history is second to none, but their fans use of 13 is laughable. Credit where credit is due, they have 6 to 8 very credible NC. I say 6 if you want to really be prickish about it, but 8 is the number if you ask me. That alone is pretty damn sweet.
There's only one ridiculous one to me: 1941. But that makes up for 1966 when we got totally shafted.
And don't blame us: ask college football warehouse LINK
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:40 am to StPeteLSU
Yah you're probably right.. it's the same thing like someone else claiming the NC some of the years they won it.. more than 3 of their NC's are legit but some other stupid school probably claimed some of the years that Bama won outright, just like they did for a few of their questionable ones.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:42 am to StPeteLSU
When you go back to the days before the AP and UPI, you have several teams claiming titles for the same season. I don't think it matters in the whole scheme of things. It was a long time ago.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:43 am to StPeteLSU
It is not correct. I'm sure he considers all the pre-AP era as split. No problem with that.
'09,'92,'78,'64,'61 , were all unanimous.
Using his criteria, all of LSU's titles are considered split.
I personally have no problem with any or all of Bama's titles being split. I'll take split for the next five years in a row, no problem.
'09,'92,'78,'64,'61 , were all unanimous.
Using his criteria, all of LSU's titles are considered split.
I personally have no problem with any or all of Bama's titles being split. I'll take split for the next five years in a row, no problem.
This post was edited on 12/6/11 at 6:44 am
Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:53 am to StPeteLSU
Can we get a Bama NC Board..


Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:54 am to Smash Mouth Tider
I'm still new to this site but I bet I've seen this crap thread 75 times! 

Posted on 12/6/11 at 6:58 am to fek101
75 times total over the past few years or recently? I just read an article so I posted it. I looked back over a few days and didnt see a thread. But it looks like you have been on here way longer than me. My apologies. Just catching up on some recent articles.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 7:01 am to StPeteLSU
I read that article also and its probably accurate.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 7:04 am to genro
quote:
And don't blame us: ask college football warehouse LINK

Posted on 12/6/11 at 7:06 am to bona fide
quote:
'09,'92,'78,'64,'61 , were all unanimous.
The '64 title wasn't unanimous and the only people that think it was are Bama fans.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 7:08 am to StPeteLSU
Why don't you list them with data? If not then find a sharp stick and poke yourself in the eye.
Popular
Back to top
