Started By
Message

re: Interesting take by Sark on 105 scholarships and NIL

Posted on 12/31/25 at 7:38 am to
Posted by deuceiswild
South La
Member since Nov 2007
4571 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 7:38 am to
The number should have gone down to 75 rather than increasing it to 105.
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
11610 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 7:55 am to
quote:

“I’ve got 85 scholarship players, and the money gets spread around. I don’t get more money, just a watered-down version.” He’s right. What good does it do to bring in 20 more players if you can’t afford to pay them? … When I asked Sark if he planned to bring in another running back, he went on a rant about the credibility of some agents and said, “It’s all so strategic. It’s about need and money and the cost and where’s the market and which agent are you dealing with. Some agents are rational, and some I don’t even know if they are licensed. We have no certification in college like the NFL. An agent may be a college roommate who is throwing out numbers we can’t even deal with. It’s unfortunate. So many factors come into play. What are our needs, and what are our luxuries.”


I think he's looking at these extra 20 scholarships the wrong way. This is about giving yourself a chance to have practice team players like the NFL who can be called up to the active roster in a pinch. These scholarships should be used for people who will be happy to have the full ride and no NIL. Sure, they're not bluechips you want to be playing but they know your scheme and would probably be starting at some G6 programs.

Essentially, some scenario where you have a short-term OL injury (a game or two) and the true freshman behind the starter isn't ready to play because he's so far behind technically that he's a liability to the whole offense. Instead, you can throw some senior practice team guy out there with a lower skill ceiling but does not frick up the protections.
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
18139 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 8:19 am to
While making valid points....you will get torched on here because, this is the rant...and, well....you're Texas.

Appreciate the post, regardless.
Posted by Buster83
Somewhere in Texas usually
Member since Aug 2021
5523 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 8:29 am to
You want to fix it? Go back to the old transfer portal system where a player had to sit out a season if he transferred to another school. The money part would go away. Nobody will want to pay a player that has to sit out a season.



Posted by Bigdawgb
Member since Oct 2023
3434 posts
Posted on 12/31/25 at 8:38 am to
quote:

I get that there's a cap on the revenue sharing pool. That said it's troubling if Texas boosters keep their powder dry with NIL.


I'd actually go the opposite way, if even TEXAS is too broke to play then it's probably time to reign it in a little.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter