Started By
Message
In your opinion would college FB be any worse if we went to 40-50 super conference?
Posted on 1/16/26 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 1/16/26 at 3:01 pm
I suspect the chaos is going to grow exponentially with nil and transfers rules. At some point the govt will get involved...alas
3
Posted on 1/16/26 at 3:05 pm to Dry Prong Wildcat
Probably a mixed bag.
Having one commissioner that can oversee scheduling, playoff format, tv deals, postseason deals, etc would be good.
Losing much of the history and regional connectivity of programs would be very difficult to replace.
If we could have one super conference with multiple regions that protected historical rivalries I think it would probably be a net benefit.
Having one commissioner that can oversee scheduling, playoff format, tv deals, postseason deals, etc would be good.
Losing much of the history and regional connectivity of programs would be very difficult to replace.
If we could have one super conference with multiple regions that protected historical rivalries I think it would probably be a net benefit.
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 1/16/26 at 3:29 pm to Dry Prong Wildcat
Worse because Senators would get involved to force certain programs to "make the cut" so their state is included. It wouldn't be based on merit.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 3:59 pm to AUTiger789
No
Posted on 1/16/26 at 4:02 pm to Dry Prong Wildcat
quote:
40-50 super conference
That's just a new FBS Division with 3-5 conferences.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News