Started By
Message
re: In 2027, Georgia will finally play at A&M.
Posted on 9/24/25 at 1:42 pm to BigHorn69
Posted on 9/24/25 at 1:42 pm to BigHorn69
quote:
Yea Kyle Field is loud , the city is basically a truck stop otherwise.
Lol, BCS has about 250k people and a huge bar and restaurant scene and everything centers around the school. If it's a truck stop it's a Buccees.
Posted on 9/24/25 at 1:45 pm to SaturdayNAthens
quote:
No need for loud speakers or pumping in noise like UTk and A&M feel necessary to do.
A&M does not pump in noise. With 110,000 screaming fans, we would just drown out the pumped noise. I can't speak for UTk
I am glad UGA is finally coming to Kyle. Should be a fun game.

This post was edited on 9/24/25 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 9/25/25 at 10:02 am to Dr RC
quote:
Get the frick outta here w/you lame arse fast and loose use of historical winning percentages so you can jerk off to UGA.
During the 3 game losing streak to ATM in the 1950s ATM's winning % was just under 16% less than their all-time winning %. UGA's winning % was 36% lower during that era than UGA's all time winning %. In fact the winning % of the time in question was the second lowest winning % in UGA program history. second to an abysmal period in the early 1900s. If you graph the winning % of both programs since they began playing football the period when ATM had beaten UGA 3 straight is a noticeable dip in winning historically while the ATM graph is just slightly under the norm. So in those 3 games ATM was winning pretty close to what they have done their entire existence while UGA was in the second worst period in 134 years of football. Conversely in the 3 games since UGAs winning % has been slightly above the historical average and so has ATMs...so UGA was at a low point in historical terms when they lost 3 in a row to ATM and ATM was slightly above average for ATM when they lost 3 in a row to UGA while UGA was outpacing their historical average by almost the exact same number......maths is hard!
Popular
Back to top


0






