Started By
Message

re: I'd rather have UVA/UNC than OU/TX.

Posted on 7/24/21 at 10:05 pm to
Posted by Athos
Member since Sep 2016
11878 posts
Posted on 7/24/21 at 10:05 pm to
Well you’re a stupid frick because you’re never getting UNC without Dook and vice-versa and NC State as well for that matter.
Posted by Biscuit68
Florida
Member since Jul 2021
23 posts
Posted on 7/24/21 at 10:09 pm to
So what your alluding to is that OK and TX have poor academic standards, weak alumni, and aren’t well connected…interesting point of view. If the SEC really wanted to raise its academic standards, sans football, then it would dump Kentucky, Alabama, LSU, Arkansas, Ole Miss, Miss State, add OK & TX, and go after UVA, UNC, Georgia Tech, and Duke.
Posted by bigbopper
Houston
Member since Jul 2015
977 posts
Posted on 7/24/21 at 10:14 pm to
Okay cool. Hook em.
Posted by Intelligent
Member since Jun 2017
672 posts
Posted on 7/24/21 at 10:19 pm to
To be honest, TX does have all of those things in abundance, but also a frick ton of baggage. We're talking about expanding the conference. Emphasis on expanding. Why not go after new markets and improve the conference. Ultimately, if TX/OU join, it is what it is. Texas and its higher ups have psychopathic levels of greed, which is why I don't want them. As for athletics, we'll probably be better than them, but its all about the $$$.
Posted by bgbam07
The Red Stick
Member since Oct 2013
207 posts
Posted on 7/24/21 at 10:32 pm to
UNC and UVA would be a dream scenario…NC State and VA Tech seem more realistic. The Hokies aren’t a charter member of the ACC…only been in the conference 20 years or so and think NC State would be willing to branch out on their own.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter