Started By
Message
re: I accidentally created the (almost) perfect cfb league with excel.
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:25 pm to Dorsal-Fin
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:25 pm to Dorsal-Fin
I don’t see the big gripe.
I much prefer conferences/rivalries be geographical instead of the actual horseshite going on.
I much prefer conferences/rivalries be geographical instead of the actual horseshite going on.
1
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:29 pm to Dorsal-Fin
why did you split up Clemson & South Carolina?
why did you split up Miami & Fla. State?
where are UNC & SMU?
why did you split up Miami & Fla. State?
where are UNC & SMU?
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:34 pm to Dorsal-Fin
quote:
What rivalries are you talking about?
IDK, just spit-balling since there are no theoretical schedules, but looking at Tennessee and Kentucky for example, they'd play what, at most three traditional SEC teams per season, if that?
(I realize you said they could move, I mean more in terms of splitting up traditional conference foes.)
Also been a proponent of something similar to this BTW, just always envisioned a 4x16 (64-team) model with wildcards.
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:37 pm to TigerintheNO
quote:
why did you split up Clemson & South Carolina?
why did you split up Miami & Fla. State?
where are UNC & SMU?
First of all, I didn't split anyone up. This is not my idea of how it should be divided, a computer sorted out the divisions based on geographical location.
Rivalries would be maintained by using a lottery slot or would automatically happen with rotation scheduling, freeing up the lottery spot for an additional randomized game.
Second of all, I messed up and forgot both it seems. I was just copying off a list of P5 teams. SMU wasn't on it and I straight up forgot UNC.
Those are minor adjustments. The overall idea is what I'm trying to get through.
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:38 pm to Jrv2damac
quote:
I don’t see the big gripe
quote:
Posted by Jrv2damac
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:40 pm to Dorsal-Fin
quote:
First of all, I didn't split anyone up. This is not my idea of how it should be divided, a computer sorted out the divisions based on geographical location.
Then why does the subject of your post read **I** accidentally created.
Whose in charge here you or your computer program, seems pretty dishonest to word it like that
This post was edited on 5/22/24 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:44 pm to paperwasp
quote:
but looking at Tennessee and Kentucky for example, they'd play what, at most three traditional SEC teams per season, if that?
True, I guess 4 would be the unlikely. There would be a few teams in that situation, but you have to break a few eggs to make an omelet I suppose. Minnesota, Colorado, Texas Tech, Mizzou, etc.
Most of them would be able to maintain regular play with their traditional rivals/opponents
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:49 pm to Radio One
quote:
Then why does the subject of your post read **I** accidentally created.
Whose in charge here you or your computer program, seems pretty dishonest to word it like that
Because, I created a formula from scratch to generate the list. I used a tool. You don't tell people that your car drove you to work or your pencil wrote your name. You say, "I drove to work" or "I wrote my name".
I certainly could've said I "generated" it.
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:53 pm to Dorsal-Fin
I wasn’t talking about PENCILS dude
Posted on 5/22/24 at 5:00 pm to Radio One
Why is your keyboard typing all this stuff? Seems dishonest
This post was edited on 5/22/24 at 5:01 pm
Posted on 5/22/24 at 5:02 pm to Dorsal-Fin
I am not the one on trial here first of all.
Second you were the person who started all this when you chose to make your post and mislead the Rant about how it was actually produced
That is why I say that I am not on trial here it is your scheme for CFB That
M,
Second you were the person who started all this when you chose to make your post and mislead the Rant about how it was actually produced
That is why I say that I am not on trial here it is your scheme for CFB That
M,
This post was edited on 5/22/24 at 5:09 pm
Posted on 5/22/24 at 5:11 pm to Hester Carries
quote:
When you say you used “excel” do you literally mean you typed names in boxes in excel? Lol
Subtle brag to let us know he can type
Posted on 5/22/24 at 5:20 pm to Radio One
I feel like you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what I did or how computers work.
Still not really sure how I’ve mislead anyone. You’re getting hung up on a weird detail.
I generated a list from scratch, and then I created a schedule format that works with said list as I saw fit.
Still not really sure how I’ve mislead anyone. You’re getting hung up on a weird detail.
I generated a list from scratch, and then I created a schedule format that works with said list as I saw fit.
Posted on 5/22/24 at 5:22 pm to Dorsal-Fin
Oh so now you ARE The one responsible for the plan hey?
Posted on 5/22/24 at 6:20 pm to Dorsal-Fin
quote:
I was playing around with excel the other day and decided to sort every P5 school by coordinates....this is what it spit out
quote:
These divisions were mathematically created by sorting coordinates from East to West into 5 sections, then halving them by sorting them from North to South.
quote:
This isn't my wheelhouse, but profits and money distribution can be done in a lot of ways, but I'm in favor of a system that rewards the players and programs for winning and investing time and resources to be better. Reward teams based on wins and contribution to the overall product. Bonuses to players, coaches, and programs for making the playoffs and winning championships etc.
Posted on 5/22/24 at 6:24 pm to Dorsal-Fin
If you are good at vlookup and Power BI, and you are looking for a job, let me know.
Posted on 5/22/24 at 6:40 pm to Dorsal-Fin
no
Edit- NO
Edit- NO
Posted on 5/22/24 at 6:44 pm to Dorsal-Fin
I only opened this thread so I could down vote it.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News