Started By
Message

re: How does Bama compare with tu in running a conference?

Posted on 5/28/13 at 7:58 pm to
Posted by LSUNV
In the woods or on the water
Member since Feb 2011
22621 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 7:58 pm to
Why are you even here? They left your conference. You must miss them more than they miss you
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 7:59 pm to
Been a member of this site for a long while (2008), and can't help but see "Texas this" and "Texas that" on this site by aggies. It's constant.
Posted by LSUNV
In the woods or on the water
Member since Feb 2011
22621 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:02 pm to
They have gotten much better. Most of them get pissed when Texas is brought up
Posted by Big Kat
Member since Feb 2009
5910 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:08 pm to
East renovation & new South side being built are to be done after 2013 season (2014 season capacity will be ~109,000). West side to be town down and rebuilt after 2014 season.

2015 to be first season in completed stadium. Capacity 102,500
Posted by FormMorm
Member since Jul 2012
389 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

TA&M voted with their feet. Best move they will ever make.
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:12 pm to
quote:


How much will the project cost and how will it be funded?

The total cost of Kyle Field Redevelopment is $450 million. 51 percent will be funded by annual seat licenses, 27 percent will be funded by Kyle Field Campaign gifts, 17 percent will be funded by Texas A&M students and 5 percent will be funded by the local government agencies.


But back to this...

This link (official) indicates that only 1/4 (or more than $100 million) is from up-front or long-term (like estate planning or life insurance) donations. The rest is from future revenue.

Construction companies don't build based on "future revenue." They get paid by bonds that are then paid off by future revenue, i.e. "debt."

https://kylefield.com/faq
Posted by tmc94
Member since Sep 2012
11559 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:21 pm to
- you were investigated by the NCAA in 1982-1983 for the period 1977-1979

- you were found guilty but no penalties were assessed for that investigation

- you were placed on NCAA probation in 1983

- SMU was given the death penalty in 1985 in an effort to clean up the SWC

- The DMN ran an expose on an ongoing widespread horn pay-for-play scheme in March 1986

- you were investigated by the NCAA in 1987

- you were found guilty of paying players between 1977 and 1987

- Incoming head coach David McWilliams (a former assistant) was specifically listed in the report as paying athletes ("McWilliams, 44, is mentioned with others as providing cash for athletes or arranging for athletes to receive money, some of which was repaid." - LA Times, 03-24-87)

- After being found guilty of directly paying players (including coach involvement) in a widespread and completely uncontrolled manner over multiple years and involving numerous players and boosters, before, after and during an NCAA investigation, Texas had its incoming signee limit reduced by 5 for one calendar year in 1988

My favorite part - having read the quotes so we know what this was:
quote:

Athletic Director DeLoss Dodds characterized the listed violations as minor.

This post was edited on 5/28/13 at 8:28 pm
Posted by Big Kat
Member since Feb 2009
5910 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

The total cost of Kyle Field Redevelopment is $450 million. 51 percent will be funded by annual seat licenses, 27 percent will be funded by Kyle Field Campaign gifts, 17 percent will be funded by Texas A&M students and 5 percent will be funded by the local government agencies.


Sounds like in that 51% is the PSL's and suites.

The students portion is about $5MM/yr for 30 years
Posted by Summer of George
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
5999 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:41 pm to
You're a ghey
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:51 pm to



this teasip fool got a steel-toe up his gunt
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

Athletic Director DeLoss Dodds characterized the listed violations as minor.





holy hell
Posted by plutonium55
Chernobyl Former USSR
Member since Mar 2010
2969 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

They STILl didn't get called for holding.


LSU didn't get called for pass interference either.
Posted by AginAL
Member since Dec 2010
1378 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

Been a member of this site for a long while (2008), and can't help but see "Texas this" and "Texas that" on this site by aggies. It's constant.


Yeah and have you looked at ShaggyBevo lately??? Innumerable patronizing "Aggy" posts..

Hypocrite..

The Big "12" is now an irrelevant wasteland. Apart from Texas vs OU - who gives a shite.

Ya'll are reaping what you sewed. Good riddance!
Posted by Bamatab
Member since Jan 2013
16130 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

This is a silly question. Bama does not 'run' the SEC.


It sure does get implied (or even outright said) on this site a whole heck of a lot. Apparently Bama/REC runs the SEC office. I guess the proof of that is that the SEC office is in Birmingham or something. I don't know, I'm still trying to figure it out.
Posted by Bamatab
Member since Jan 2013
16130 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

You're a ghey



Posted by KaiserSoze99
Member since Aug 2011
31669 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

Pony Excess has several moments alluding to their control but none that straight up go out and say it really from what I remember

That's what I was referring to. It's not a direct allusion to the fudgepackers, but given the circumstances, etc. it's not hard to make that conclusion. I could be wrong.

Here is the link to Pony Express.
Posted by Garfield
Kew Gardens
Member since Dec 2011
7790 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

This is a silly question. Bama does not 'run' the SEC.


quote:

It sure does get implied (or even outright said) on this site a whole heck of a lot.


Not taking their side, but there is some truth to this. Live in Nashville and our sports talk relative to SEC is pretty balanced because we have a large contingent of fans from numerous SEC schools. All the talk today was that Slive lets Saban run the conference. It wasn't a Bama thing or even really a negative, they just had a bunch of folks on that all agreed that Slive respects Saban, Saban can say things that Slive likes without it putting Slive in a corner, and Slive has pretty much trusted Saban with being the vocal mouthpiece for the SEC.
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 10:56 pm to
Now we're cookin' with cooking oil, tmc94. I'm glad you brought up the David McWilliams "violations." I've been waiting for this.

Let's look closer at them, directly from the NCAA infractions report:

quote:

By his ignorance of some NCAA rules and by ignoring others, an assistant football coach was involved in several violations.

Specifically, he: (a) provided small amounts of cash (up to $20) to a student-athlete over
the course of the young man's enrollment (1983-1986), cash that was later
repaid upon request;

(b) loaned a student-athlete $200 to pay bail bond, a loan that was repaid;

BOOSTER (c) failed to convey the proper rules interpretations to a representative of the university's athletics interests, which caused the
representative (who was prepared to abide by the rules) to contact a prospective student-athlete in person and to assist the prospect in obtaining
employment with his firm prior to the young man's graduation from high school and before the young man signed his letter of intent, and

(d) signed the young man to a National Letter of Intent during an improper recruiting contact at
the young man's high school. [NCAA Constitution 3-1-(g)-(5) and Bylaws 1-1-
(b)-(2), 1-2-(a)-(4) and 1-2-(b)]

(I think this one is David McWilliams)

5. During the period January 1982 to December 1984, a former assistant football coach (the present head football coach), two former
assistant football coaches and a former recruiting coordinator (present
assistant director of athletics) arranged for or provided several studentathletes
with various amounts of cash for the young men's personal use.

Further, on several of these occasions, the student-athletes repaid the money.

Specifically:

a. Subsequent to the 1980 Bluebonnet Bowl, an assistant coach provided a student-athlete a small amount of cash to purchase a bus
ticket from Austin to the young man's home town.

b. During the spring of 1982, an assistant coach arranged for a member of the athletics department business office to provide a student athlete
with at least $50 cash to pay the cost of a fine the young man owed to the university.

c. During the 1984 football season, an assistant coach provided a student-athlete approximately $10 to $20 cash to purchase gasoline for the young man's trip to his home; further, this money was repaid to the coach.

d. On two occasions, the recruiting coordinator gave cash to a student-athlete for miscellaneous purposes. Specifically, during the
1981-82 academic year, the young man was given approximately $20 cash, and during the 1983-84 academic year, the young man received $40 cash.

e. In December 1983, the recruiting coordinator paid $56 cash on a bail bond for a student-athlete, cash that the young man repaid the
following week.

f. On one occasion during the fall of 1984, an assistant coach gave $20 to a student-athlete in order for the young man to purchase a
one-way airline ticket (cost of $36) between Austin and his home; further, this money was repaid to the coach.

g. During the fall of 1983, the recruiting coordinator provided a loan of approximately $21.70 to a student-athlete in order for the
young man to travel home; further, the loan was repaid to the recruiting coordinator. [NCAA Constitution 3-1-(g)-(5), 3-1-(h) and 3-4-(a)]


Now seriously, tmc94, that's some piddly shite right there. Violations, yes. But piddly shite.

Compare that to a slush fund at SMU that ran into the tens of thousands, and A&M coaches showing up in the yard with new cars.

Ten or 20 dollars here and there, most (if not all) repaid. Small bail bonds, an airline flight and bus fare to go home (I think it was for a funeral)... all repaid.

Get real.
Posted by texasaggie08
Triple D, TX
Member since Dec 2010
1428 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 11:40 pm to
A&M being "in debt" is definitely the #1 talking point that tu fans like jerking off to. Its been beaten into the ground, several years and one athletic director and president later.

I guess the fact that you have to go to that far to the bottom of the barrel to find your favorite aggy story tells us all we need to know
Posted by tmc94
Member since Sep 2012
11559 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 11:57 pm to
The fact that the NCAA report ignored this doesn't make your point unless you've flipped sides in this discussion. The NCAA whitewashed the horns violations on multiple occasions.

This pay-for-play system was probably as egregious as anything but SMU because it covered an extended period, under the eyes of multiple coaches and ADs. The DMN only interviewed 28 players (all former players btw). 24 of them admitted they took money. It's full on professional football over a 10-year period while under NCAA investigation. And the cheating continued unabashed even after the NCAA handed out the death penalty to SMU. That takes a pretty big set of balls or it was pretty well-known that the fix was in.

And after being caught red-handed: wrist slap
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter