Started By
Message
Posted on 9/13/26 at 5:12 pm to VYForever
I think what’s weird is your mining for Aggie tears while propping up a not-as-advertised QB that you billed as a generational talent.
The guy is pretty pedestrian as far as QBs go and he’s shown practically no improvement from year to year.
I get that he’s the face of your program but I’m not sure he’s even the best person on your offense.
The guy is pretty pedestrian as far as QBs go and he’s shown practically no improvement from year to year.
I get that he’s the face of your program but I’m not sure he’s even the best person on your offense.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 5:19 pm to VYForever
Your own fan in the Arch thread:
Looks like you guys don’t even want him.
quote:
Posted by SECCaptain 9/13/26 at 5:16 pm to Bamafig
No, Arch is a very flawed QB skill wise. Lacks touch, fairly inaccurate, has poor coordination/footwork, and doesn’t see play development/the field well Texas can win the natty with him, but he’s nowhere near the level of Mensah or Maiava
Looks like you guys don’t even want him.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 5:32 pm to JayAg
Literally zero Longhorns would trade Arch for Reed. Especially after last night. One can admit and openly talk about the flaws in their QB’s without wanting to trade him for a QB who couldn’t have lead the game winning drive against the #1 team without the requisite ice in his veins.
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 5:33 pm to VYForever
quote:
Posted by SECCaptain 9/13/26 at 5:21 pm to Whentheleveebreaks
He’s not going to be a good nfl QB and anyone thinking about taking him in the first 3 rounds is smoking. The Texas and Arch situation is similar to 2024 Ohio State and Will Howard
Dang
Posted on 9/13/26 at 5:35 pm to JayAg
Even if true, still a better current QB situation than Aggie has.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 5:37 pm to VYForever
quote:
Even if true
So you admit you’re not an Arch fan. That is all.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 5:43 pm to JayAg
lol wut. I’m allowing space for that to be true, not signing up to that line of thinking (those were someone else’s original opinions).
Posted on 9/13/26 at 6:42 pm to VYForever
Neither of them are that good and have significant issues. I’d rather have Oklahoma St.’s QB.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 6:45 pm to VYForever
Serious question. Why do you care?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:18 pm to VYForever
Ru fricking serious? Lolololol
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:21 pm to VYForever
It’s hard to say. He’s lost to Texas twice but he’s beaten LSU twice. The reason we lost to Miami is we had no running game in a game that was so windy it was nuts. That and we had no kicking game worth a damn.
That would have made our game closer too.
Honestly, I don’t think we beat you with Arch. We didn’t lose to you because of QB play.
It’s a team game. We had no running game. And that was required to win.
It wasn’t a QB issue.
That would have made our game closer too.
Honestly, I don’t think we beat you with Arch. We didn’t lose to you because of QB play.
It’s a team game. We had no running game. And that was required to win.
It wasn’t a QB issue.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:22 pm to VYForever
quote:And literally no A&M fan has said you would.
Literally zero Longhorns would trade Arch for Reed.
You’re the only one here who set up the hypothetical scenario.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 7:52 pm to VYForever
Arch is a bitch. I want neither
Posted on 9/13/26 at 8:02 pm to VYForever
Good gravy you are so desperate for big brother’s attention
I would not want arch Manning as a quarterback, all he has going for him is his feet, maybe he’ll continue to improve but right now he does not like look like a 4th-year quarterback which he is
I would not want arch Manning as a quarterback, all he has going for him is his feet, maybe he’ll continue to improve but right now he does not like look like a 4th-year quarterback which he is
Popular
Back to top

0






