Started By
Message
re: Ha Ha received money from asst strength coach
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:00 pm to JustGetItRight
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:00 pm to JustGetItRight
quote:
I think it is 100% safe to say the coach is gone. Probably 'suspended' until the HR people do whatever they must to formally dismiss him.
Not as sure about HaHa, but it wouldn't surprise me if he's gone too.
Otherwise, unless someone can show Bama covered anything up I think it ends there.
agree completely. i think the alabama program is fine, at worst a couple scholarship reductions over the next 2-3 years. coach is absolutely gone, no doubt in my mind. HaHa's status is really the only unknown. if i was a betting man, a 4 game suspension., but it also wouldn't surprise me if he was gone.
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:00 pm to chinese58
quote:
They probably talked to a current or former compliance person from one of that state's schools.
Dude, really. Read the story before you post unless you find great joy in talking straight out your arse.
If you had bothered to do so, right there in the third paragraph you would have learned that their source was
quote:
John Infante, a former compliance official at Loyola Marymount and Colorado State and author of the Bylaw Blog for AthleticScholarships.net
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:01 pm to greygoose
quote:
That might have been the case if he Yahoo/Fluker story wasn't out there. Agents, former players acting as runners for agents, boosters, and now coaches paying players. Huge shitstorm coming and it's just now starting to sprinkle.
I bet your dick is so hard it could cut glass right now
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:02 pm to Big Lake
Legend13
Link he was ineligible or STFU.
quote:Big Lake
Ha Ha was not ineligible while he was playing those games.
quote:I understand very well how NCAA violations work. Like I said before Ha Ha was not ineligible while playing these games.
I dont think you understand how violations work
Link he was ineligible or STFU.
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:03 pm to asphinctersayswhat
there's no way
they are a program of class, dignity, and the alabama way
they are a program of class, dignity, and the alabama way
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:03 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
Posted by Geauxgurt on 10/3 at 4:23 pm to lsursb Wouldn't the fact that a staff member gave the loan clearly prove that Bama should've known since it happened? I mean, the fact is that if it was a booster, I'd get the fact that you couldn't punish the school if they didn't know, but when an employee/staff member from that same team is involved it's a bit different. Truth is HaHa should be suspended, and any games he played in since a COACH "loaned" him money, should be vacated/forfeited. Pleading ignorance shouldn't be an option here. Hell, USC could claim that too, but still got raked over the coals for Bush's crap and it was with an outsider not connected to USC.
This is my question on the situation and I might have missed if someone in the know answered it.
1 when hcd took the loan he because ineligible
2- to become eligible again, he would have to go thru the NCAA via alabama compliance department.
3- since that process has not taken place, he was ineligible in every games he's played in
So what is the penalty for playing an ineligible player? Is it to forfeit games?
4- if it has to be that "alabama knowingly played an ineligible player" to be forfeited...well a member of the Alabama coaching staff DID know, did not say anything and allowed him to play.
So who and how many people have to know?
This is not only hcd violating the rules but a member of Alabamas coaching staff.
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:04 pm to narddogg81
None of us are going to read an article from AL.com talking about what someone who wrote a book thinks will happen. We're waiting on the next shoe to drop.
Too many websites doing investigations into this stuff now for an article on AL.com to bring it to an end. Remember how the Willie Lyles thing started with, "Nothing to see here, it's just schools paying for recruiting information."
Too many websites doing investigations into this stuff now for an article on AL.com to bring it to an end. Remember how the Willie Lyles thing started with, "Nothing to see here, it's just schools paying for recruiting information."
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:05 pm to Legend13
I just read the article.
It seems the 500 shouldn't be a big deal, now the 12 Charger, ipad, custom embroidery, Air Jordans...etc, seem excessive for a dude that cant scratch up 500 bucks. 2+2=4
It seems the 500 shouldn't be a big deal, now the 12 Charger, ipad, custom embroidery, Air Jordans...etc, seem excessive for a dude that cant scratch up 500 bucks. 2+2=4
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:05 pm to JustGetItRight
quote:
John Infante, a former compliance official at Loyola Marymount and Colorado State, close friend of Nick Saban, and author of the Bylaw Blog for AthleticScholarships.net
fify
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:05 pm to asphinctersayswhat
This is delicious. 
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:05 pm to greygoose
quote:
That might have been the case if he Yahoo/Fluker story wasn't out there. Agents, former players acting as runners for agents, boosters, and now coaches paying players. Huge shitstorm coming and it's just now starting to sprinkle.
lots of people seem to really need to believe this, but its just not going to happen. 1) ncaa pretty much gelded itself with the miami case debacle and its own misdeeds 2) bama compliance is so far out ahead of this that its not even funny. The Luther thing was reported to the NCAA by the compliance department months before any story came out, and nobody would ever have know about the haha thing if we had not self reported that as well. NCAA cant waste what little credibility it has to hammer a school that is doing everything it can to comply when its letting off schools like a&m and auburn who lawyer up and obfuscate.
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:06 pm to chinese58
quote:
None of us are going to read an article from AL.com
This
AL.com is the biggest homer site East of the Mississippi
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:07 pm to tigerfoot
Not being a homer, but just cause he has those things doesnt mean that he would have $500 set aside in case of any emergency.
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:07 pm to jatebe
quote:
jatebe
that's a lot of stuff for a kid to have that can't afford $500. why not file an insurance claim?
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:08 pm to jatebe
dude has Jordans but can't scrape $500 bucks together.
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:09 pm to insertbama
quote:
, but just cause he has those things doesnt mean that he would have $500 set aside in case of any emergency.
one would think his parents would, or whoever cosigned for the broken in car. Or do fellas with no job get loans independently?
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:09 pm to lsufball19
2c3cdxbg0ch168553 Get on that Title history
Posted on 10/3/13 at 5:09 pm to insertbama
quote:
Not being a homer, but just cause he has those things doesnt mean that he would have $500 set aside in case of any emergency.
brand new car, expensive sound system, etc. where is the rich relative to loan him $500 that paid for all of that stuff?
Popular
Back to top



0






