Started By
Message

re: Georgia’s pathetic record- SEC protecting these wussies needs to end…

Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:35 pm to
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
39353 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

It isn't speculation that Williams had 4 catches for 64 yards in 1 quarter.


Bama didn’t do shite with those yards outside of a FG. That’s isn’t speculation either.
Posted by mbogo
Member since Oct 2012
2799 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Not all knocks and bruises are the same. A player who has a sprained ankle, or separated shoulder, playing at 75% just ain’t the same as a healthy player playing at 100%.



No, but whether someone is cleared and able to play is the same. Bama had players, like Robinson, played hurt, but he was playing and that is what matters. A player who is out obviously isn't cleared and is a different matter.
Posted by mbogo
Member since Oct 2012
2799 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

Bama didn’t do shite with those yards outside of a FG. That’s isn’t speculation either.



They did better at that point than they did in the SECCG blowout and that was without Metchie.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
26028 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:53 pm to
Because UGA was doing the same things defensively?



/s
Posted by mbogo
Member since Oct 2012
2799 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

Not a single bama player touched him on that td. It was wide open, as his man totototo was focused on the run, with a backup wr blocking.



Is he the best TE in the country?
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
39353 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

No, but whether someone is cleared and able to play is the same


You have already proven you don’t understand the concept of snap count limits, so no wonder this is also over your head.

Bowers and Nakobe had injuries too, but not quite like salyer and smith did in game 1.
Posted by mbogo
Member since Oct 2012
2799 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

The gift that keeps giving.



The gift was the injuries to Bama players that allowed you to win the NC.
Posted by SaturdayNAthens
Georgia
Member since Dec 2017
12033 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:56 pm to
Alabama is a whiny little bitch. They know they lost but instead of accepting that defeat and moving on they cry and whine. We wuz hurt!!! We wuz hurt!!! Waaah! Waaah!! Waaah!!
A once proud program has turned into a shadow of its self and is having a hard time dealing with that fact. Too bad! Georgia is enjoying the heck out of our National Championship and hearing the sore losers boo hoo makes it even better. Man, Georgia really hurt y’all! lol
BTW. Any team that loses to that disgusting cult in College Station shouldn’t have been allowed into the playoffs to begin with.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
39353 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

he the best TE in the country?


He wasn’t voted to be the best, but that doesn’t change the fact that you thought be broke 4 tackles to score, which proves you don’t have a clue about shite.
This post was edited on 6/4/22 at 4:10 pm
Posted by mbogo
Member since Oct 2012
2799 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

You have already proven you don’t understand the concept of snap count limits, so no wonder this is also over your head.



I understand if a player played more snaps a month earlier the number of plays he played a month later was due to scheme, coaching decisions, etc, not availability.

They were cleared to play and the fact you've now tried to change the discussion to players cleared to play shows a desperation to find something to mitigate your struggle that Georgia would have lost without the injury luck.
Posted by mbogo
Member since Oct 2012
2799 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

He wasn’t voted to be the best


I didn't ask you if he was voted the best. I asked he was the best when addressing you, whether you think he is the best.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
39353 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

understand if a player played more snaps a month earlier the number of plays he played a month later was due to scheme, coaching decisions, etc, not availability.


Since you have zero proof he played more than 18 snaps in previous games, you should quit making shite up and expecting people to believe you.

Similar to your false broke 4 tackles BS.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
39353 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

didn't ask you if he was voted the best. I asked he was the best when addressing you, whether you think he is the best.


Only matters if the unbiased person voters thought he was the best. They didn’t. Stupid point irregardless Of my opinion.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
39353 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

They were cleared to play and the fact you've now tried to change the discussion to players cleared to play shows a desperation


Not changing the discussion, but rather adding to it, which is terrible news for you. You had already lost it before that additions.
Posted by mbogo
Member since Oct 2012
2799 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Since you have zero proof he played more than 18 snaps in previous games, you should quit making shite up and expecting people to believe you.



All you have to do is look up his snap count a month earlier.
Posted by mbogo
Member since Oct 2012
2799 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

Only matters if the unbiased person voters thought he was the best. They didn’t. Stupid point irregardless Of my opinion.



If the announcers in the NC game said he was the best then...
Posted by mbogo
Member since Oct 2012
2799 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

Not changing the discussion, but rather adding to it, which is terrible news for you. You had already lost it before that additions.



The first time you've tried the cleared players argument, so it is changing it. There is no argument as to who had the worse injury luck since it isn't opinion. You continue to want to engage me when you see my posts because you are struggling with knowing Georgia wouldn't have won otherwise. It would have been easier on you if you had just accepted it and be thankful you don't have to listen to the 40 year jokes any longer.
This post was edited on 6/4/22 at 5:39 pm
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
39353 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

All you have to do is look up his snap count a month earlier.

Link it. The burden is on you
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
39353 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

the announcers in the NC game said he was the best then...


I don’t know if they said it, but It damn sure doesn’t matter as 36 yards ain’t shite
Posted by Pulpwood Patterson
Member since Dec 2017
1799 posts
Posted on 6/4/22 at 6:22 pm to
You’re validating subjective data, 17 points is a blowout, 15 is not..appealing to consideration then hand waving off Alabama looking like crap a large part of the rest of the year. If 15 isn’t a blowout, neither is 17, Objectively.

A NC game was played, Georgia won, objectively. Alabama lost 2 games, GA 1. Objectively. And common opponents don’t stop being a reality just because a game is played. You want to play the what if game then ignore what if TB simply falls down in bounds, or FL or LSU makes one more play.

It would be no less reasonable borrowing your faulty logic lto say UGA had a bye in the SECC and didn’t care, rendering the SECC ultimately meaningless.
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12 ... 25
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 25Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter