Started By
Message
re: Explain why Alabama losing by 21 to an Oky team
Posted on 12/4/24 at 3:06 pm to Dawg4Life47
Posted on 12/4/24 at 3:06 pm to Dawg4Life47
UGA be like 1-9 vs Alabama in their last 10...
"BuT ThEy wERe clOSe"
"BuT ThEy wERe clOSe"
Posted on 12/4/24 at 3:11 pm to Mizzouligan
Let's be honest. Only 2 teams in the SEC are playing good football right now. Texas and USC.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 3:12 pm to Darindawg
Better wins and they get a little credit for having a good loss to Tennessee.
It will be garbage if SMU gets bumped for committing the sin of losing their conference championship game.
It will be garbage if SMU gets bumped for committing the sin of losing their conference championship game.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 3:16 pm to DakIsNoLB
If they lose to a trash Clemson team they should be bumped. Since when did losing down the stretch become ok in College football? Sure hasn't been that way before this year. They have mucked this entire thing up so bad. Luckily most college football fans are low brow and easily convinced.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 3:44 pm to Darindawg
UGA lost to Bama and should have lost to Kentucky …. You were down by almost 30 points to Bama …. You need to stop talking before we just eliminate UGA from playoffs
Posted on 12/4/24 at 3:44 pm to PappyGarcia
Given the expanded playoff, what you're saying opens the door to teams that didn't have to play a conference title game jumping teams that lose a conference title game.
It's not losing down the stretch; the stretch is over. It's losing the conference title game. It's no longer one division winner versus the other; it's the best two teams in the conference. Unless it's a blow out loss or the 2nd best team has 3-4 losses prior to the conference title game, I don't see how they should be penalized for losing. This has played out before; Bama and UGA both going to the CFP when one of them lost to the other in the conference title game.
A previously one-loss SMU losing a close one to Clemson shouldn't get SMU bumped. That's how my low brow sees it.
It's not losing down the stretch; the stretch is over. It's losing the conference title game. It's no longer one division winner versus the other; it's the best two teams in the conference. Unless it's a blow out loss or the 2nd best team has 3-4 losses prior to the conference title game, I don't see how they should be penalized for losing. This has played out before; Bama and UGA both going to the CFP when one of them lost to the other in the conference title game.
A previously one-loss SMU losing a close one to Clemson shouldn't get SMU bumped. That's how my low brow sees it.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 3:50 pm to labamafan
Honestly Miami above USC and Ole Miss is a travesty.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 3:52 pm to DakIsNoLB
But yeah we beat Clemson at their place with their playoffs on the line. You don't think we would beat SMU as well if they lose to Clemson on a neutral field?
Posted on 12/4/24 at 3:54 pm to PappyGarcia
I agree. Schedule has to matter when teams are inking same records. It’s never going to be about just wins or just losses.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 3:56 pm to Tider13
quote:
Why did Georgia lose to said Alabama team?
Deboer emptied the playbook causing Bama to look like azz the next 3 weeks
Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:00 pm to MacMan10
quote:
The committee said Alabama vs top 25 was the difference.
Like when they whooped UGA's arse...AGAIN.
Oh Damn ! That's just brutal !
Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:09 pm to Bigdawgb
quote:
Deboer emptied the playbook causing Bama to look like azz the next 3 weeks
DeBoer is only able to run maybe 25% of his playbook with Milroe out there.

Imagine how bad it would have been with the rest of it.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:15 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Miami’s losses are in no way consorvskento Oklahoma and Vandy
I don’t speak Swahili
Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:21 pm to PappyGarcia
quote:
But yeah we beat Clemson at their place with their playoffs on the line. You don't think we would beat SMU as well if they lose to Clemson on a neutral field?
I don't see how that means SMU should be dropped out if they lose a close one. It also doesn't mean they couldn't beat your South Carolina.
I think South Carolina would have as good chance as any in the CFP, but needed to pick up one of those losses.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:21 pm to Bigdawgb
Somehow UGA has little bro syndrome 

Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:34 pm to DakIsNoLB
We did. LSU was not a loss. Also there is no transparency in the committee they could drop SMU for Bama in a heart beat and just mumble some words about data points.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:34 pm to MacMan10
quote:
Somehow UGA has little bro syndrome
It started in 2008 with that drubbing at home
2012 - Best chance in Richt's tenure to get a title. Would have def beat ND in the natty just like 'Bama did.
2015 - 'Bama looking wounded after OM loss. UGA favored at home. Again they get run out of their own stadium.

2017 - Another golden opportunity to get a natty. 'Bama shut out the first half of a title game. Georgia blows multiple double digit leads to a true freshman. They'll remember the game-winning TD forever.
2018 - SEC championship. More double digit leads, with Tua going down in the game. Chokes horribly to Hurts, preventing another title opportunity if they would've won.
2020 - Blown out in BDS, hurting their chances for a playoff bid. UF finished it later that year.
2021 - Blown out again, this time in Atlanta. Won the rematch straight up, but everyone knows why.
2023 - Long undefeated streak. 'Bama coming off another horrible IB. Georgia gets run over almost the whole game on both lines of scrimmage. Threepeat opportunity thwarted.
2024 - Still fresh, and the main reason 'Bama is still in playoff consideration despite some bad losses. Georgia fans would be stupid to suggest they're not nervous about a potential rematch somewhere down the line during the CFP.
So yeah, I don't blame them for the little brother attitude. They've experienced so much trauma from 'Bama just in the last 20 years.

But the Crimson nightmare continues.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:37 pm to DakIsNoLB
If you are good and worthy of the title you shouldn't lose this late don't care about a conference title game. It's freaking common sense.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:57 pm to PappyGarcia
quote:
We did. LSU was not a loss. Also there is no transparency in the committee they could drop SMU for Bama in a heart beat and just mumble some words about data points.
Really? The records say it was 36-33 LSU over South Carolina. You don't get credit for the games you should have one.
The way I see it:
Oregon, TX, Penn St, ND, UGA, Ohio St, TN, Indy are locks. That still leaves the winner of 3 other conference title games: ASU/ISU, Boise/UNLV, Clemson/SMU. That puts you at 11. If Clemson loses, that's Bama's in. If SMU loses, SMU should still go, but, I'll give it to you that the committee could pull some shenanigans and put Bama in anyway. Yes, Bama is getting too much love with the likes of Miami, BYU, Ole Miss, and South Carolina right there next to them.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 5:04 pm to PappyGarcia
quote:
If you are good and worthy of the title you shouldn't lose this late don't care about a conference title game. It's freaking common sense.
It's more nuanced than that, and that should be common sense. There's no way a 2-loss conference championship loser (i.e. had 1 loss going into it) should get jumped by a 2 or 3 loss team that sat at home that weekend.
Popular
Back to top
