Started By
Message
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:03 pm to jddawg58
quote:
So where does Washington rate, with their BPI of 55. At around twice the suckage of Bama.
So you believe in meaningless ratings? I'd rather be 1st place in my conference and have won 7 of 8. Bama has been irrelevant in basketball for the last 5-6 years. Nice 6-6 conference record.
This post was edited on 2/19/12 at 6:05 pm
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:05 pm to 1991UW
Whereas Washington has been irrelevant forever...
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:07 pm to 1991UW
How do you feel about Romar? He seems to largely underachieve for the most part.
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:10 pm to 1991UW
quote:
So you believe in meaningless ratings? I'd rather be 1st place in my conference and have won 7 of 8. Bama has been irrelevant in basketball for the last 5-6 years. Nice 6-6 conference record.
Conference championships are overrated, see Bama football 2011 NC.
As far as meaningless ratings, these numbers are ESPN's so start an argument with them if you like.
You will likely have to win the Pac-12 since there is talk that the amazing PAC-12 could be a 1-2 bid league. Doesn't say much for western basketball.
Don't recall Washington being in many Final Fours, did I miss something?
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:11 pm to TT9
quote:
Whereas Washington has been irrelevant forever...
3 Sweet 16s in 6 years= irrelevant forever? When did you do that?
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:12 pm to jddawg58
quote:
Don't recall Washington being in many Final Fours, did I miss something?
Don't recall Bama even being in the tourney....
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:13 pm to TT9
quote:
Ever made an elite 8?
yep, we have one final 4.
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:14 pm to 1991UW
Answer my question about Romar
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:16 pm to 1991UW
quote:
Ever made an elite 8?
yep, we have one final 4.
Maybe we will see you in the tourny. Good luck if you don't win that formidable basketball conference.
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:17 pm to Bryant91092
quote:
How do you feel about Romar? He seems to largely underachieve for the most part.
If making the sweet 16 as an 11 seed and barely losing to #1 UNC (and the refs) last year in the 2nd round equals underachieving.... then I guess so.
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:19 pm to 1991UW
Wasn't he on the hot seat with UW a few years back? Or am I remembering incorrectly
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:20 pm to Bryant91092
quote:
Wasn't he on the hot seat with UW a few years back? Or am I remembering incorrectly
Seat was a little warm... never hot though. We had a few off years but we are back now.
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:22 pm to 1991UW
Okay. I'm glad my memory isn't terrible. Y'all and Cal are looking best for bids out of the Pac 12 right?
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:24 pm to Bryant91092
quote:
Okay. I'm glad my memory isn't terrible. Y'all and Cal are looking best for bids out of the Pac 12 right?
Cal, UW and maybe Zona. All have potential to go far in the tourney... just look at Zona last year no one saw them going to the Elite 8. No one thought UW would be in the Sweet 16 in 2010 either.
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:25 pm to 1991UW
I think I read yesterday night that Arizona may be screwed since they've lost to both you and Cal
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:28 pm to Bryant91092
quote:
I think I read yesterday night that Arizona may be screwed since they've lost to both you and Cal
They will get in because of their name. They got in with 14 losses 3 years ago I believe. The whole selection process is a joke... it has more to do with name than resume.
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:32 pm to 1991UW
I was thinking, we better hope Green comes back. If the team only wins home games from here out the committee could say we're not the same team without certain players and hold that against us. I think Green will come back, but if his relationship with Grant were to sour, you never know.
Posted on 2/19/12 at 6:33 pm to 1991UW
UConn currently a 9 seed on bracketology despite being 10th place in the Big East (6-8 conference record) and losing 7 of their last 9 games. Shows what a joke the selection committee/talking heads are.
Popular
Back to top
