Started By
Message
Posted on 12/28/12 at 1:52 pm to elit4ce05
quote:
And making yourself look like an idiot in the process. Obviously your opinion is in the minority. What makes you feel that your opinion has more merit than the opinion of the majority of sports writers?
Stop it guise, he's obviously right. Everyone else is wrong.. There has never and never will be a dynasty in any of our lifetimes.

Posted on 12/28/12 at 1:53 pm to elit4ce05
quote:
And making yourself look like an idiot in the process.
I wasn't aware that using history was the idiotic way of doing things, as opposed to setting my own standards as to what a dynasty is.
quote:
Obviously your opinion is in the minority.
I'm not sure how you've gathered this. Minority amongst ESPN writers and Bama fans? Yes. And that's easily explained. Ratings for ESPN and fans gonna be fans.
quote:
What makes you feel that your opinion has more merit than the opinion of the majority of sports writers?
where did I say this? I've said numerous times that this was my opinion. You're the one getting all upset over one man's opinion.
I don't think Bama is a dynasty. I think it's a good 5 year run. DWI.
Posted on 12/28/12 at 1:55 pm to cas4t
quote:
Back in September, Bama reached No. 1 in the AP poll for the fifth straight season, which had been accomplished only one other time in the last 50 years

Posted on 12/28/12 at 1:55 pm to CrimsonFanSince94
quote:
Stop it guise, he's obviously right. Everyone else is wrong..
Again, I've said numerous times that this was my personal opinion. DWI.
quote:
There has never and never will be a dynasty in any of our lifetimes.
Also never said this. I clearly said that there MAY never be a dynasty in our lifetime.
Posted on 12/28/12 at 1:56 pm to Bwbama
What we cheersing to? Bama has had a great 5 year run, no doubt about it 

Posted on 12/28/12 at 1:56 pm to cas4t
Maybe you haven't figured out that your opinion isn't worth shite. I gave you a page that has links to many other writers that share the same opinion. You are the one who is too dumb to google any of this. As when I do basically the same search, I get MANY articles in what is considered a dynasty. Maybe you should try again.
Posted on 12/28/12 at 1:57 pm to elit4ce05
In order for Alabama to be a dynasty, according to Cas4t, Nick Saban's son would need to take over for him, win, pass the mantle to his son, who also wins, and so on before the inevitable fall of house of Bama.
Of course, you could substitute son for assistant coach. The key is that there must be an unbroken line of succession.
Considering that has never happened in American football. There are no sports dynasties.
Of course, you could substitute son for assistant coach. The key is that there must be an unbroken line of succession.
Considering that has never happened in American football. There are no sports dynasties.
This post was edited on 12/28/12 at 1:59 pm
Posted on 12/28/12 at 1:58 pm to Bwbama
According to him, it don't count until it reaches 290 years.
Posted on 12/28/12 at 2:00 pm to CrimsonFanSince94
quote:
There has never and never will be a dynasty in any of our lifetimes
Dynasties? No
Mini-dynasties? Absolutely
LINK
Posted on 12/28/12 at 2:01 pm to PurpleandGold Motown
Guys, it's Friday don't be so upset over one man's opinion. Damn. I mean who cares what I think? I'm an LSU fan amirite?
Posted on 12/28/12 at 2:01 pm to DaBama
Well according to WordIQ.com:
A sports dynasty is a team that enjoys a period of dominance over the sport, generally gauged via championship titles.
Ex:
Packers of the 1960s
Steelers of the 1970s
49ers of the 1980s
Cowboys of the 1990s
NE Patriots of the 2000s
A sports dynasty is a team that enjoys a period of dominance over the sport, generally gauged via championship titles.
Ex:
Packers of the 1960s
Steelers of the 1970s
49ers of the 1980s
Cowboys of the 1990s
NE Patriots of the 2000s
This post was edited on 12/28/12 at 2:02 pm
Posted on 12/28/12 at 2:02 pm to DaBama
quote:
Mini-dynasties? Absolutely
Those crazy Cajuns

I tell you what
Posted on 12/28/12 at 2:03 pm to cas4t
quote:
cas4t
Boy, is that the "bat building" in your avi?

Posted on 12/28/12 at 2:03 pm to PurpleandGold Motown
quote:
Packers of the 1960s
Steelers of the 1970s
49ers of the 1980s
Cowboys of the 1990s
NE Patriots of the 2000s
You just posted entire decades. Not half decades.
Oh and was Alabama on that list? Because you didn't post them.
This post was edited on 12/28/12 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 12/28/12 at 2:03 pm to 615tider
quote:
Boy, is that the "bat building" in your avi?
You know it. Gotta represent


Posted on 12/28/12 at 2:08 pm to cas4t
quote:
Better than a pic of Hickory Harlem mall
FIFY
Ain't nothing to see in there anymore.
Posted on 12/28/12 at 2:09 pm to cas4t
quote:
You just posted entire decades. Not half decades.
No, WordIQ.com chose decades, but teams rarely dominate for an entire decade. The packers had a 7 year run where they won 5 championships under Lombardi. It's still considered a sports dynasty.
You selectively choosing to use the definition of dynasty as it applies to the familial or political realm when discussing sports is silly.
Posted on 12/28/12 at 2:14 pm to 615tider

Popular
Back to top
