Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/19/11 at 9:45 am to parkjas2001
So was he concussed?
Posted on 8/19/11 at 9:48 am to TreyAnastasio
CGC doesnt discuss injuries but that is the consensus from others.
Posted on 8/19/11 at 9:54 am to parkjas2001
sounds like an elaborate cover up to me
Posted on 8/19/11 at 9:55 am to TreyAnastasio
Me too...I'm o my way down there today . Ill let you know.
Posted on 8/19/11 at 9:56 am to TreyAnastasio
quote:
to me
Uh huh.
Posted on 8/19/11 at 9:57 am to beatbammer
quote:
to me
Uh huh.
Lighten up Frances
Posted on 8/19/11 at 9:58 am to TreyAnastasio
quote:
sounds like an elaborate cover up to me
well the plains are burning.
Posted on 8/19/11 at 9:58 am to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Lighten up Frances
Okie dokes.
Posted on 8/19/11 at 10:00 am to piggidyphish
quote:
well the plains are burning.
Do yall not have a fire department? Seems like thats been going way to long.
Posted on 8/19/11 at 10:02 am to TreyAnastasio
quote:It's just a fog machine. There actually is no fire. Go figure.
Do yall not have a fire department? Seems like thats been going way to long.
Posted on 8/19/11 at 10:30 am to Funky Tide 8
Without pads in street clothes?
Posted on 8/19/11 at 10:54 am to MonroeTiger3
5 dyer michael
Michael Dyer RB 69
5-9 210 3
SO Little Rock, Ark. (LR Christian Academy)
I dont give a rat's arse what you think.....5'9" 210 is NOT big...might be alot of muscle, but I never said he wasn't muscular...but 5'9" is SMALL
and 210 is NOT the big for an every down back in the SEC..plus add in these mysterious "injuries" and it makes for the probability that he doesn't last the full year without missing time.
Again, I hate when people deny the obvious just because he is a player on their team, its rediculous.
He IS electric and makes plays, but he is small in stature, period.
Michael Dyer RB 69
5-9 210 3
SO Little Rock, Ark. (LR Christian Academy)
quote:
I don't even like the kid but he is a ball of muscle bruh. He ran over Patrick Peterson last year on 1 play.
I dont give a rat's arse what you think.....5'9" 210 is NOT big...might be alot of muscle, but I never said he wasn't muscular...but 5'9" is SMALL
and 210 is NOT the big for an every down back in the SEC..plus add in these mysterious "injuries" and it makes for the probability that he doesn't last the full year without missing time.
Again, I hate when people deny the obvious just because he is a player on their team, its rediculous.
He IS electric and makes plays, but he is small in stature, period.
Posted on 8/19/11 at 11:03 am to the LSUSaint
You are dumb if you think 5'9" and 210-215 lbs is small for an every down back in the SEC.
5'9" may be short, but at that height, 210-215 lbs of muscle is not small. Also, why does a RB need to be tall?
FTR-Spencer Ware is an inch or 2 taller and and just about 10 lbs heavier. Not much of a difference.
Michael Ford is the same size or a little smaller.
5'9" may be short, but at that height, 210-215 lbs of muscle is not small. Also, why does a RB need to be tall?
FTR-Spencer Ware is an inch or 2 taller and and just about 10 lbs heavier. Not much of a difference.
Michael Ford is the same size or a little smaller.
quote:But it isn't small as you claimed. Quit moving the goal post now that you realize you were wrong.
5'9" 210 is NOT big.
This post was edited on 8/19/11 at 11:07 am
Posted on 8/19/11 at 11:05 am to WDE24
Hes just a little fella
Posted on 8/19/11 at 11:21 am to the LSUSaint
he's 216, and closer to 5'-8" than 5'-9"
Posted on 8/19/11 at 11:31 am to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Do yall not have a fire department? Seems like thats been going way to long.
Trooper has been fanning it with his towel.
Posted on 8/19/11 at 12:08 pm to the LSUSaint
quote:
I dont give a rat's arse what you think.....5'9" 210 is NOT big...might be alot of muscle, but I never said he wasn't muscular...but 5'9" is SMALL
So... is Mark Ingram small?
Was Emmitt Smith small?
Posted on 8/19/11 at 1:49 pm to beatbammer
Posted on 8/19/11 at 1:51 pm to beatbammer
Dyer looks closer to 5'6...
Page 7 of 8
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News