Started By
Message

re: Dream 3-Deep RB Rotation

Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:36 pm to
Posted by NOLATide
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2007
2576 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

He is a very good back. But he is not in MY top 3.
How many times did that little wingback McCluster go over 100?
Posted by BlueIndian420
Member since Feb 2010
1876 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

I was simply pointing out to yall's newb that the Heisman Trophy doesnt make you a badass


Just becuase we are "newbs" to this forum, does not mean we dont know just as much about football as you lol. That is the way your statement just came off. I am not going to argue with you about this cause it is a stupid argument. Ingram was the best player in CFB this year...Toby had more yards but his YPC were not as good.
Posted by Big Fat
"Fear the Hat" returns 2010
Member since Sep 2009
5404 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:37 pm to
McFadden
Cecil Collins
Cadillac/Ronnie Brown (your choice)
Posted by lawrence
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2010
243 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:38 pm to
Cecil Collins
Darren McFadden
Cadillac Williams
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90739 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:38 pm to
You're also using a Seniors, 4th year stats against a Sophomore's. Ingram in both their second years, had 400 more yards than Jackson. If you want to compare more evenly, do that. Over their first two years, Ingram has more TD's, more rushing yards and more receiving in the same timeline as other touted RB's.
Posted by Crompdaddy8
Jimmy Rustler
Member since Nov 2009
10569 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:39 pm to
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36140 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

I agree, and I think the Heisman is a joke more often than not. But Ingramns stats were incredible, and cannot be questioned by reasonable people. Plus he did what he did behind an OL that was consider by most to be our weak link before the season. Most of the criticism is hollow and rings of Bama hatred, rather than any other objective reasoning.


There's room for reasonable people to take notice of how well Richardson did this year when given the chance... or note that Bama was fairly balanced and better on offense than they were expected to be

None of that seems like Bama hatred... seems like kool aid in a way really

And when the Heisman always goes to a skill offensive player from a high profile school it is clearly a far cry removed from it's stated purpose of honoring the best player in college football. It should clearly go to a variety of positions - including linemen and defense only players
Posted by Klaus
Del Boca Vista
Member since Sep 2008
4507 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:39 pm to
Shaun Alexander
Kevin Faulk
Erric Rhett

Posted by Crompdaddy8
Jimmy Rustler
Member since Nov 2009
10569 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:40 pm to
Heisman trophy=kiss of death to NFL career
Posted by mmjones87
we so cold
Member since Oct 2008
14206 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

How many times did that little wingback McCluster go over 100?



I put him in my rotation for a change of pace and his pass catching ability.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36140 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

You're also using a Seniors, 4th year stats against a Sophomore's. Ingram in both their second years, had 400 more yards than Jackson. If you want to compare more evenly, do that. Over their first two years, Ingram has more TD's, more rushing yards and more receiving in the same timeline as other touted RB's.


Well if we just wanted to go with obscene stats in college I'd think we'd talk at least a little about Barry Sanders (gawd, same team at thurman thomas at ok state... ridiculous)

Single year Jackson (Bo missed most of his junior year due to injury and didn't play as much as an underclassman) was clearly better than Ingram IMO... but that's just because Jackson was a once in a decade kind of player... not because Ingram isn't great
Posted by secftw
FL
Member since Jan 2010
3311 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

False

Signed

Jason White


Didn't LSU beat them that year?

And I believe that the Heisman trophy is for what happens in college. McFadden was my choice when he lost to Tebow, and he hasn't been all that spectacular in the NFL. Nor has Reggie Bush. Nor has Matt Leinart. But they were badasses on the field in college. Just because heisman trophy winners haven't had a good career after college, doesn't mean they weren't great college athletes.
Posted by Jaydeaux
Covington
Member since May 2005
18776 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

Didn't LSU beat them that year?

WTF does that have to do with anything?

T or F, Ingram had the best RB stats in FBS?
Posted by Klaus
Del Boca Vista
Member since Sep 2008
4507 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:46 pm to
Guys, nobody is sitting here disputing that Ingram is a talented running back. This argument is fricking retarded.
Posted by Jaydeaux
Covington
Member since May 2005
18776 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

So was Ingrams season. You realize, that in Bo's Heisman season, he only had like 1786 yds and Ingram had over 1900 total yards in his, right?


You're commparing All Purpose yds? cause Ingram had like 1650 rushing. Hunter trying to throw some smoke? not like you
Posted by secftw
FL
Member since Jan 2010
3311 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

WTF does that have to do with anything?

T or F, Ingram had the best RB stats in FBS?


Because if LSU beat them, how could he have been the best player on the best team?

And are we really going to bring up a RB who ran in a piss-poor conference and managed a shite ton of 1 yard TDs?
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90739 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:52 pm to
1650 yards Jackson only had 1786. All purpose goes into it. He produced on the field, leaving off yardarge when he touched the ball is stupid. It was all running and receiving out of the backfield. Discounting any is stupid. he's got over 2770 yds and 32 TD's and one turnover in 2 yrs. That can't be brushed away.
This post was edited on 2/18/10 at 1:53 pm
Posted by secftw
FL
Member since Jan 2010
3311 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

1650 yards Jackson only had 1786. All purpose goes into it. He produced on the field, leaving off yardarge when he touched the ball is stupid. It was all running and receiving out of the backfield. Discounting any is stupid. he's got over 2770 yds and 32 TD's and one turnover in 2 yrs. That can't be brushed away.


Not to mention he didn't even get half the team's carries. He shared the ball a lot.
Posted by Jaydeaux
Covington
Member since May 2005
18776 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

And are we really going to bring up a RB who ran in a piss-poor conference and managed a shite ton of 1 yard TDs?


You can angle it anyway you want. Just saying he wasn't the top RB this year. Getting 50 yds v Arky should have put him out of the conversation.
Posted by secftw
FL
Member since Jan 2010
3311 posts
Posted on 2/18/10 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

You can angle it anyway you want. Just saying he wasn't the top RB this year. Getting 50 yds v Arky should have put him out of the conversation.



You're right. Because Gerhart's 80 vs Wake was so very impressive.

Ingram didn't get the number of carries Gerhart did, and was held to a grand total of 29 carries between the team's 3 weakest opponents (yet still managed 250 yards). 29 carries was like an average game for Toby.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter