Started By
Message

Does this turn out like 2003 unfortunately for the bammers?
Posted on 11/23/11 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 11/23/11 at 12:34 pm
2003:
Coaches- 1 USC, 2 LSU, 3 OU
AP- 1 USC, 2 LSU, 3 OU
BCS- 1 OU, 2 LSU, 3 USC
2011:
Coaches- 1 LSU, 2 Bama, 3 OSU
Harris- 1 LSU, 2 Bama, 3 OSU
BCS- 1 LSU, 2 OSU, 3 Bama
First I'd like to say that I would like to play Bama and am not "scared" of a rematch. Just pointing out that a higher ranking in the polls didn't bode well for USC in 2003.
The differences from 2003 are that OSU will not be #1 in the computer but also that Bama will not be #1 in the polls. So it evens out in that regard. The question stands: Will Okie have enough of a lead in the computers to jump Bama into the BCS title? the way the computers have favored them all season it's a possibility.
Again, not saying this will happen or taking a stance. Just some food for thought.
Coaches- 1 USC, 2 LSU, 3 OU
AP- 1 USC, 2 LSU, 3 OU
BCS- 1 OU, 2 LSU, 3 USC
2011:
Coaches- 1 LSU, 2 Bama, 3 OSU
Harris- 1 LSU, 2 Bama, 3 OSU
BCS- 1 LSU, 2 OSU, 3 Bama
First I'd like to say that I would like to play Bama and am not "scared" of a rematch. Just pointing out that a higher ranking in the polls didn't bode well for USC in 2003.
The differences from 2003 are that OSU will not be #1 in the computer but also that Bama will not be #1 in the polls. So it evens out in that regard. The question stands: Will Okie have enough of a lead in the computers to jump Bama into the BCS title? the way the computers have favored them all season it's a possibility.
Again, not saying this will happen or taking a stance. Just some food for thought.
Posted on 11/23/11 at 12:35 pm to rpenni4
Good god man. There's a sticky right at the top of the board.
Posted on 11/23/11 at 12:36 pm to rpenni4
Damn, how many times can this redundant shite be posted??
Posted on 11/23/11 at 1:05 pm to LsuTool
I would laugh only because I heard from plenty of bammers after 2004 that if bammer was in a similar position they would not be left out of the title game cuz they are Alabammer. 

Posted on 11/23/11 at 1:14 pm to The ChizMan Cometh
Yeah, you'd have a point if we were undefeated...like Auburn was.
The fact that we are where we are, with a loss on the record, pretty much validates what we were saying back then.
The fact that we are where we are, with a loss on the record, pretty much validates what we were saying back then.
This post was edited on 11/23/11 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 11/23/11 at 1:16 pm to DvlsAdvocat
Devil hurtin them with some truth.
Popular
Back to top
