Started By
Message
re: do you agree or disagree with jesse palmer?
Posted on 11/30/15 at 2:32 pm to idlewatcher
Posted on 11/30/15 at 2:32 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
Name 5 jobs that would be above LSU.....
1.) Bama
2.) USC
3.) Michigan
4.) Ohio State
5.) ND
6.) Georgia
6.) Oklahoma
8.) Florida
8.) Texas
All of these jobs are better
2
Posted on 11/30/15 at 2:33 pm to idlewatcher
USC
Bama
Tex
OSU
FSU
OU
Mich
LSU
UF
UGA
Bama
Tex
OSU
FSU
OU
Mich
LSU
UF
UGA
Posted on 11/30/15 at 2:35 pm to white beans
I disagree. If LSU fires Les after winning LSU's superbowl, no decent coach in college football would want that job with those unreasonable expectations.
Posted on 11/30/15 at 2:35 pm to white beans
quote:
why would we all of a sudden turn incompetent and listless in a search to find someone who can adequately pilot our football program on and off the field?
LSU also hired DiNardo.
Saban was hardly a "find." Everyone knew he was good. Good programs hire bad coaches all the time. Look at Michigan with Rich Rod and then Hoke.
Not to mention if you guys had fired Les, people may not be lining up for the job considering the success he has had. That does have a bearing on who you can attract.
Posted on 11/30/15 at 2:39 pm to white beans
quote:
we found nick saban, then les miles
we also found skip bertman, then pulmonary who has bagged more hardware in his sport than les has in his
why would we all of a sudden turn incompetent and listless in a search to find someone who can adequately pilot our football program on and off the field?
Because you have a different standard than when Miles was hired. Your expectations for consistent success are much higher now than they were 11 years ago.
Posted on 11/30/15 at 2:43 pm to white beans
quote:
and do you honestly believe that lsu can do no better than les miles and middle of the pack in the secw?
Les Miles is the best coach LSU can get.
Posted on 11/30/15 at 2:44 pm to TeLeFaWx
Imagine if they had fired Les after he won their superbowl.
They would have been down at the street corner trying to find a coach.
They would have been down at the street corner trying to find a coach.
This post was edited on 11/30/15 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 11/30/15 at 2:46 pm to MontyFranklyn
Michigan is not better in 2015. Oklahoma doesn't have the natural recruiting grounds that LSU does (although both rely heavily on Texas).
I'd say LSU falls somewhere in that 5-10 range though right now.
I'd say LSU falls somewhere in that 5-10 range though right now.
Posted on 11/30/15 at 2:48 pm to tlsu15
quote:
Michigan is not better in 2015. Oklahoma doesn't have the natural recruiting grounds that LSU does (although both rely heavily on Texas).
I'd say LSU falls somewhere in that 5-10 range though right now.
So delusional.
Posted on 11/30/15 at 2:50 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
Easily top 5
1.) Bama
2.) UF
3.) Ohio State
4.) USC
Then you have ND, Texas, FSU, OU, Michigan, and UT in no specific order... LSU is up there, but I laugh when thinking top 5....
Posted on 11/30/15 at 2:54 pm to Kamikaze25
Not to forget, Louisiana is significantly different culturally than any other state. I personally loved that, but some hate it. Depending on the coach, it may help or hurt LSU.
Posted on 11/30/15 at 2:56 pm to tlsu15
quote:
Convenient he mentions this as soon as USC is off the table.
I liked Low's dig at Tennessee:
Only two of the 20 changes came because coaches left to take higher-profile jobs. Lane Kiffin left Tennessee for USC following the 2009 season, and James Franklin left Vanderbilt for Penn State following the 2013 season.
LINK
UT is to USC as Vandy is to PSU.
Posted on 11/30/15 at 2:56 pm to white beans
I'd say 1a UGA 1b LSU.
Only Because UGA pretty much just has UF as far as SEC divisional title runs go. Swap divisions and I'd swap rankings.
Only Because UGA pretty much just has UF as far as SEC divisional title runs go. Swap divisions and I'd swap rankings.
Posted on 11/30/15 at 2:56 pm to Kamikaze25
It fluctuates so I would not rank schools but would categorize class 5 jobs.
USC, Texas, ND would not like it but lSU, UGA and UF belong in there.
USC, Texas, ND would not like it but lSU, UGA and UF belong in there.
Posted on 11/30/15 at 2:58 pm to CCTider
Bama
ND
OSU
Michigan
UTexas
USC/LSU/UGA
PSU/UTenn/FSU
ND
OSU
Michigan
UTexas
USC/LSU/UGA
PSU/UTenn/FSU
Posted on 11/30/15 at 3:15 pm to tlsu15
All the schools I listed, outside of Georgia and Florida, are blue bloods. It is what it is.
Posted on 11/30/15 at 3:18 pm to white beans
makes alot of sense
making the offense shite loads better would of been easy as hell for mcelwain, tom herman, etc in year 1 seriously i have no doubt LSU is loaded with talent on offense
i mean talent wise their top 5 in the country in quite a few positions
making the offense shite loads better would of been easy as hell for mcelwain, tom herman, etc in year 1 seriously i have no doubt LSU is loaded with talent on offense
i mean talent wise their top 5 in the country in quite a few positions
This post was edited on 11/30/15 at 3:19 pm
Posted on 11/30/15 at 3:31 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
So delusional.
How was I delusional? Michigan hasn't been the premier program in their own state, much less conference, for the last 5 years. Oklahoma is a great job, but LSU has a built in recruiting base that OU simply can't match.
Do you not think today's LSU program would be considered a top 10 job opening?
Posted on 11/30/15 at 3:34 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
All the schools I listed, outside of Georgia and Florida, are blue bloods. It is what it is.
I agree, but Michigan hasn't been Michigan in quite some time.
Posted on 11/30/15 at 7:14 pm to Gritshack
quote:
LSU also hired DiNardo.
Deserves more credit than he gets.
This post was edited on 11/30/15 at 7:19 pm
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News