Started By
Message
re: Details released on Arizona’s NOA from the NCAA. LSU on deck.
Posted on 10/27/20 at 9:01 am to Tuscaloosa
Posted on 10/27/20 at 9:01 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Looks like they're going in order

quote:
My guess is due to the unprecedented complexity of the case

quote:you should consider a career in fiction. there's no proof whatsoever at this point that there was ANY cheating by the bball program. none. there is an allegation. what "cheating" do you imagine the fb program did.
institutional cheating being done by both Football and Basketball under roughly the same window of time
quote:allegedly arranging payments.
The head coach arranging payments for 11 different players in exchange for their signing with a program is truly astounding
it's astonishing that people are waiting eagerly for news of ARIZONA'S BBALL PROGRAM hoping that it will somehow affect lsu's bball program. people will always let you know who they fear the most.
it's also hilarious that bama people, of all schools, are trying to be so well versed in the intricacies of ncaa procedures. bama people are constantly yelling from the rafters that they couldn't care less about bball.

it's also hilarious that these halfwits are all up in lsu's business - IN THE SAME CONFERENCE AS KENTUCKY
Posted on 10/27/20 at 9:03 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
This is one of the most egregious cheating scandals in NCAA sports history

psu?
msu?
smu?
unc?
usc?
ole miss?
nope. LSU!!
Posted on 10/27/20 at 9:04 am to MetryTyger
quote:why do people keep calling him a "booster?"
ONE rogue booster - (1) John Paul Funes
Posted on 10/27/20 at 9:04 am to bfniii
quote:
how long have you been posting ridiculous things like this. 2 years? you people can't even see how pathetic you are. lsu derangement syndrome. get help
I would be shocked if the basketball program didn't get at least a two year post season ban. It could be worse. We're talking about a head coach, not a rogue booster or even an assistant coach - directly offering payments to recruits/players. This is going to be really, really bad. Stick your head in the sand if you must.
Posted on 10/27/20 at 9:07 am to bfniii
quote:
there's no proof whatsoever at this point that there was ANY cheating by the bball program. none.
We can't take you seriously with takes like this.
This post was edited on 10/27/20 at 9:08 am
Posted on 10/27/20 at 9:10 am to bfniii
quote:
why do people keep calling him a "booster?"
I would imagine that's the NCAA's label of him:
quote:
Boosters, referred to by the NCAA as “representatives of the institution’s athletic interests,” include anyone who has:
Provided a donation in order to obtain season tickets for any sport at the university
Participated in or has been a member of an organization promoting the university’s athletics programs.
Made financial contributions to the athletic department or to a university booster organization.3
Arranged for or provided employment for enrolled student-athletes.
Assisted or has been requested by university staff to assist in the recruitment of prospective student-athletes.
Assisted in providing benefits to enrolled student athletes or their families.
Been involved otherwise in promoting university athletics.
Posted on 10/27/20 at 9:12 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:you're probably one of those people who think the smart comments were actual proof of something
directly offering payments to recruits/players
quote:says the person who apparently doesn't understand what's going on
Stick your head in the sand if you must
here's a question - what are the similarities between the arizona case and the lsu case?
This post was edited on 10/27/20 at 9:14 am
Posted on 10/27/20 at 9:13 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:from the posts itt, i don't think people are taking you seriously. you are combing the internet for news of arizona's bball program. how pathetic is that. even lsu fans aren't doing that
We can't take you seriously with takes like this
Posted on 10/27/20 at 9:13 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:yeah, now prove that applies to funes
I would imagine that's the NCAA's label of him:
Posted on 10/27/20 at 9:15 am to bfniii
quote:
you're probably one of those people who think the smart comments were actual proof of something
The NCAA seems to think so, or else I can't imagine them putting forth the effort of moving forward with the infractions case.
quote:
says the person apparently doesn't understand what's going on
What do you think is going to happen to LSU basketball?
Posted on 10/27/20 at 9:16 am to bfniii
quote:
you are combing the internet for news of arizona's bball program. how pathetic is that. even lsu fans aren't doing that
Gee... I wonder why.
Posted on 10/27/20 at 9:40 am to Tuscaloosa
basketball
who gives a shite
who gives a shite
Posted on 10/27/20 at 9:41 am to cajunbama
Who are you?
This post was edited on 10/27/20 at 10:21 am
Posted on 10/27/20 at 9:46 am to Jebadeb
quote:
If the case against LSU is so strong why has LSU still gotten no NOA and why is it going to the IARP?
Any infractions case begins with a Notice of Inquiry (with allegations) sent to an institution from the NCAA enforcement staff. After an institution receives a notice from the enforcement staff, they or the NCAA can request referral to the Infractions Referral Committee (IRC).
The IRC reviews the inquiry and if it concurs, can elevate the case to the Complex Case Unit (CCU), which is where the actual investigative work is done.
The CCU brings its findings to the Independent Resolution Panel (IRP), which reviews the allegations brought forth, as well as the school’s response. They hold a hearing, decide if violations indeed occurred, appears to then issue what we would previously deem as a Notice of Allegations (NOA), and then administer penalties if necessary.
The Independent Accountability Oversight Committee (IAOC) overseas the entire process.
Thus, the Independent Accountability Resolution Process (IARP) consists of the Independent Accountability Oversight Committee (IAOC), which oversees the IRC, CCU, and IRP.
Therefore, if the case is already in the IARP, then LSU has received a Notice of Inquiry (with allegations), reportedly alleging:
quote:
"[Wade] arranged for, offered and/or provided impermissible payments, including cash payments, to at least 11 men's basketball prospective student-athletes, their family members, individuals associated with the prospects and/or non-scholastic coaches in exchange for the prospects' enrollment at LSU."
The referral from two NCAA committees to the IARP reportedly stems from Wade’s “lack of cooperation” to provide cell phone records for 13 months.
If the IARP finds that LSU committed Level 1 or Level 2 infractions, it allows the university to fire Wade with cause, per his amended contract.
ETA: Better distinction between a Notice of Inquiry (with allegations) and an NOA. Maybe?

This post was edited on 10/27/20 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 10/27/20 at 9:59 am to paperwasp
Thank you, paperwasp, for dropping quality information in this thread. That was a wonderful post.
Posted on 10/27/20 at 10:15 am to WilliamTaylor21
quote:
Weird, I remember you “retiring” from the Rant after LSU railed A1abana in front of tDonald.
And let that be a lesson to you, nobody beats LSU 9 times in a row!


Posted on 10/27/20 at 10:24 am to Gustave
Well, we DID beat y'all 5 times in a row and 7 of 8 to start this century.
Since you brought up the past an all....
Since you brought up the past an all....
Popular
Back to top
