Started By
Message
re: Dellenger: NCAA expected to immediately increase signing limit from 25 to 32
Posted on 9/24/21 at 7:02 am to TigerLunatik
Posted on 9/24/21 at 7:02 am to TigerLunatik
quote:
Someone just added 7 more Challengers to their order.
This post was edited on 9/24/21 at 7:07 am
0
Posted on 9/24/21 at 7:07 am to senior scramble
The magic portal is here to stay, so we do need some law and order to subsidize this new free agency in recruiting. 32 seems right for now.
I am sure the NCAA never suspected that teams would use the portal for their primary recruiting but many have. And just look at Michigan State from last season.
I see BAMA redefining how they do business on a much grander scale as well. Face it, these transfer guys are much more developed and proven, and guess what? They can't transfer again, so loyalty will be a premium with these guys.
I like the idea that NFL-bound kids don't count against the 7 additional recruits. Suspended kids shouldn't count. And players that are run off as well. Only players stepping into the magic portal of their own volition get replaced immediately.
I am sure the NCAA never suspected that teams would use the portal for their primary recruiting but many have. And just look at Michigan State from last season.
I see BAMA redefining how they do business on a much grander scale as well. Face it, these transfer guys are much more developed and proven, and guess what? They can't transfer again, so loyalty will be a premium with these guys.
I like the idea that NFL-bound kids don't count against the 7 additional recruits. Suspended kids shouldn't count. And players that are run off as well. Only players stepping into the magic portal of their own volition get replaced immediately.
Posted on 9/24/21 at 7:42 am to paperwasp
The NCAA needs to be disbanded. The kind of shite they produce can only come when you have to many people in the room.
How can they possibly defend a 6th year of eligibility, and now increase the annual signing cap, without addressing the 85 scholarship max? My nephew is a Sr and a very good HS football player- just not Bama/ UGA good; just below Power 5. Know how many scholarships "just below Power 5" have to give this year? About 5 on avg because their Sr's aren't going pro. And this ruling doesn't change that.
How can they possibly defend a 6th year of eligibility, and now increase the annual signing cap, without addressing the 85 scholarship max? My nephew is a Sr and a very good HS football player- just not Bama/ UGA good; just below Power 5. Know how many scholarships "just below Power 5" have to give this year? About 5 on avg because their Sr's aren't going pro. And this ruling doesn't change that.
Posted on 9/24/21 at 7:47 am to bamameister
quote:
am sure the NCAA never suspected that teams would use the portal for their primary recruiting
Because they are stupid
quote:
these transfer guys are much more developed and proven, and guess what? They can't transfer again,
This isn't true
quote:
like the idea that NFL-bound kids don't count against the 7 additional recruits. Suspended kids shouldn't count. And players that are run off as well. Only players stepping into the magic portal of their own volition get replaced immediately.
Football is dead.
Posted on 9/24/21 at 8:10 am to HailToTheChiz
quote:
Football is dead.
It's safe to say your football acumen is on life support anyway.
Posted on 9/24/21 at 8:38 am to WorkinDawg
quote:
How can they possibly defend a 6th year of eligibility, and now increase the annual signing cap, without addressing the 85 scholarship max?
I agree. They should’ve done that concurrently as soon as they added additional eligibility, IMO.
Posted on 9/24/21 at 10:00 am to paperwasp
If the NCAA was really aiming for more parity, they'd reduce the number of scholarships, not increase them.
But as a Bama fan...keep on increasing those scholarships!
But as a Bama fan...keep on increasing those scholarships!
Posted on 9/24/21 at 10:35 am to TigerLunatik
quote:
Someone just added 7 more Challengers to their order.
5 of those might need to be used. Can't find 7 new ones due to chip shortage.
Posted on 9/24/21 at 11:24 am to paperwasp
so dumb. should be doing the opposite and lowering to 20 and lowering overall count to 70. Need more parity for the game to survuve. NFL learned that yet CFB is going opposite way 
Posted on 9/24/21 at 12:01 pm to MackDaddyBrown
quote:
Did they think Little Nicky needed more help?
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News