Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Committee proposes penalties for attempts to circumvent football’s transfer process

Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:50 pm
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
83949 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:50 pm
NCAA.org

quote:

The NCAA Division I Football Bowl Subdivision Oversight Committee on Wednesday recommended that the Division I Cabinet adopt emergency legislation to address schools adding transfer student-athletes to their football roster if the student-athletes did not provide notification of their wish to transfer during football's January window.

Committee members proposed significant penalties for schools that are found to have violated this rule.

If the measure is approved, once an enrolled student-athlete who was not active in the Transfer Portal at the time of transfer participates in any athletically related activity at the next school, the following actions would occur:

The head coach would be prohibited from all football (recruiting and on-field coaching) and administrative duties (team meetings) through the sixth contest of the season.

The school would be fined 20% of its football budget.

The school would be required to reduce the number of roster spots by five for the next season, regardless of the head coach's employment status at the school.

If approved at the Division I Cabinet meeting in April, the legislation would become effective immediately.

Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
52215 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 4:00 pm to
This rule may be aimed at the Miami's of the world but they should at least let Duke go get a QB.

Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
14529 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 4:32 pm to
Are there any notable examples of transfers that would have violated this rule?
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
21781 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 4:40 pm to
Noticing that there are no penalties listed against the player involved. If that holds up, players would have no grounds to file suit , as the individual would have no "damages" to sue for. No way that 20 % of a school's athletic budget as one penalty will pass.
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
52215 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

Are there any notable examples of transfers that would have violated this rule?

Rumor is teams we were gearing up to ignore this rule.

This rule is probably the only reason why A-day can return to traditional format so I hope it sticks.
Posted by bamabaseballsec
Member since Dec 2020
3702 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 5:37 pm to
Football budget, not athletic budget
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
37699 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 5:49 pm to
Is it called the "Golding Rule"?
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
42652 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 6:03 pm to
The NCAA is trying so desperately to regain relevance and governing power ... when, in fact, it holds neither nor will it likely ever again.

Everything is in the hands of the courts now.

The NCAA is nothing more than a paper tiger.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter