Started By
Message
Posted on 8/18/24 at 3:51 pm to Victor R Franko
Agreed. That and the previous map is tough to believe. Not a jab, but I also thought viewership would be down with games televised in LHN
Posted on 8/18/24 at 3:55 pm to PCRammer
Too busy being poor to watch CFB I guess
Posted on 8/18/24 at 3:57 pm to OU Guy


Posted on 8/18/24 at 3:59 pm to OU Guy
Texas is mighty pink. We didn’t need a visual to tell us that.
Posted on 8/18/24 at 7:14 pm to OU Guy
quote:
quote:
That's from a new york times article that's 10 years old.
Yes it appears sketchy.
Or…you just appear to be really fricking stupid.
Posted on 8/18/24 at 7:21 pm to RollingwiththeTide
quote:
I guess not if this map is correct.
It’s not.
Posted on 8/18/24 at 7:23 pm to Mizzouligan
You know there's a big community note on it right
Posted on 8/18/24 at 7:26 pm to Mizzouligan
quote:
As with the first map, the data is a reflection of the number of people in a given county who "like" a college football page on Facebook.
Posted on 8/18/24 at 8:37 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
You know there's a big community note on it right
Why reference something from ten years ago?
Posted on 8/18/24 at 9:08 pm to Mizzouligan
quote:
Why reference something from ten years ago?
Because as you noted, he's really fricking stupid.
Posted on 8/18/24 at 9:09 pm to OU Guy
Using Facebook as a metric is dumb.
Posted on 8/18/24 at 9:10 pm to GreatPumpkin
It's really not given the algorithms
Posted on 8/18/24 at 9:16 pm to OU Guy
The tweet got community noted.
But probably not far off. Birmingham is the largest college football viewership market and has been for some time.
But probably not far off. Birmingham is the largest college football viewership market and has been for some time.
Posted on 8/18/24 at 10:43 pm to Themicah86
Does Dallas still have a NFL team?
Posted on 8/18/24 at 10:50 pm to secuniversity
quote:
The tweet got community noted.
But probably not far off. Birmingham is the largest college football viewership market and has been for some time.
Thats why I said a few posts after the OP it seemed sketchy. And it was not marked when originally posted. I also noted it had no reference as well.
Its probably close but some areas would have higher viewership percentage wise than it shows. Rural areas likely have a higher percentage of viewers nationally compared to metro areas due to “more things to do” in metros than rural.
Popular
Back to top
