re: Clemson has last 4 of last 9 Out of Conference Wins over SEC teams

quote:

---

There's a whole community fans that act like dabo apparently. I'm going to have to make sure not to sit by Clemson fans at the beach or something.

---

Big Ed. I stopped reading this thread with your post. you said all that needs to be known about the clan from Pickens Tech.

it starts on Sundays in their local churches. it then moves to the radio call in shows with the mouthpieces put in place by that school.

they have the political network close to that of The Citadel and the arrogance of Notre Dame. it truly is a unique and disturbing existence for those that are enshrined into that cult.

B.C. Inabinete was the modern day godfather of the orangitis that cripples so many in the Palmetto State.

--------------------------------------------------------

Clemson's increasing success wasn't entirely a result of Locke's cheating. He had others cheating for him. He knew the importance of having alumni assist him in working illegal "programs" on blue-chip players. One of the most effective of Locke's recruiters at the time was a former Clemson football player by the name of B.C. Inabinet.

Inabinet is a drawling, outspoken, huge man—6'8" tall, 345 pounds—and wealthy enough to make his opinions count around Clemson. He owns Defender Industries of Columbia, S.C., an industrial maintenance company which, according to Inabinet, employs 7,000 people in 28 states. Proud of both his financial and physical stature, [u]Inabinet has joked, "How can you forget a man like me? I went to a Ku Klux Klan rally and a man said, 'I don't know who anybody is under those sheets, but there's ol' B.C. over there!' "[/u

Inabinet used to arrive at Clemson home football games in a custom-built bus equipped with leather and teak bars, a TV set, stereo equipment and a P.A. system. In the back of the bus was a large seat, a "throne," where Inabinet would sit and preside over the festivities, speaking to his entourage through a microphone. Though Inabinet was one of three Clemson boosters ordered by the NCAA in 1975 to disassociate themselves from university recruiting programs, he says he is still "Clemson's official worldwide ambassador appointed by the president of the university."

Tates Locke and the truth about ClemU

It isn't about dominating, it is about the glory in achieving something when the whole world thinks you are not capable of it. It is a modern david vs goliath tale that people will remember forever, when they are running commericials promoting college football, Boyd to Hopkins on 4th and 16 against LSU is one of the clips they will use.

lol, well Clemson was like a Citadel until likd 1978 or something, women did not even go there. so it really isn't surprising our series record is kind of lopsided against some teams.

I think Clemson is a better program right now than than Kentucky, Ole Miss, MSU, Vanderbilt, Auburn, Tenn, and we capable of beating all the rest as our wins over LSU and UGA have shown. If we were playing SEC teams almost every single game, every year, we going to hvae about the same record as we do in the ACC b/c ACC is a solid conference, and it isn't as bad as it was last year. Consider it wasn't that long ago when BC had Matt Ryan at QB, UVA had Matt Schuab, NC State had Philip Rivers then Russel WIlson and the one from last year who is in NFL now, FSU had Weinke, Samantha Powers husband, Vikings QB, and then the one last year who is NFL, Va Tech has had both Vick brothers, Clemson has had Woody Dantzler, Whitehurst, Boyd, UNC had a stud whose name i forget, so on and so forth. I think ACC has a lot more talent come thru at QB and WR than SEC ever sees.

how the heck is Auburn the only reason Clemson has ever done anything? I don't understand what you t hink the connection is b/t some hick school in AL and a prestigious college in SC. LOL

Here you go with the conference cheerleading again but it doesn't matter if a program won a title when they were with ACC or not. Conferences don't win titles, programs do. If a programs is capable of winning a title not in the ACC then it is capable of winning one in the ACC.

LOL, what do Duke and UNC have to do with Clemson. I already said we have nothing to do with these other ACC schools. I think that Duke jewelry thing is trumped up by people who hate Duke's success in bball b/c how is Coach K responsible for some dumb kid doing something dumb. You'd have to fire every coach if that is a legit mindset b/c every coach has some dumb players playing for them. Coach K is a decent guy and I don't think he runs a corrupt program.

Now UNC is a different story, LOL they being investiged for like 5 different things right now.

I think you cherrypicking some website that ranks some SEC schools above ACC schools academically. These academic rankings tend to weight stuff like total research money as more important than they are given most undergrad students are not doing research. If you look soley at student body stats and average starting salary, Clemson is blowing away SEC. that is how we do it.

How can UNC be ranked over Clemson? Clemson has an engineering program, they don't. We have to have a better engineering program than one who doesn't have one at all. LOL What large state school doesn't have an engineering program, what a joke. UNC is just a big liberal arts college for hippie chicks, if you want to rague they have a better sociology program than Clemson, have at it. LOL Clemson excels in real majors over them and any SEC school. LOL

quote:

---

OrangeCrush35

---

quote:

---

as i get older i find i enjoy talking to women more than anything else.

---

So you are a 35 year old Clempson fan who has grown tired of your mom's basement that now you are in a knitting circle with her friends?

quote:

---

Excuse me for being ignorant, but how do you reply to a specific post on here, I don't see a reply option on the posts.

---

No excuse for the ignorance of your post.
Oh and hit reply under the post you to which you want to reply.

this website is kind of confusing for some reason. they just redo it like tigernet.

quote:

---

Clemson has owned SC in the series. We beat them 4 times in a row, 4 times, since 1980s. At one point it was 8 out of 9. Spurrier has done a good job but a lot of that is SEC has become a weak conference as Florida, Auburn, Tenn, LSU, UGA, even Kentucky are half the man they used to be.

---

You guys beat georgia Saturday. You really looked good and played well. Congratulations.

Your argument, though is that you beat two Top 10 SEC teams this year and last. Ok. South Carolina has beaten you guys the last 4 years in a row. Now..are we talking about recent history that makes Clemson relevant or do you want to pull up all of history? You can't have it both ways. If you want to base YOUR argument on the last two games, then we will base it on the last two games you have played South Carolina.

If you want to go overall historical Clemson is 112-160-14 against the SEC. How do you want to do this? Recent history, or historical?

All I keep hearing is how Clemson is 2 for 2 vs SEC teams. Why would it not be 2 for 3. Clemson has played 3 SEC teams in a row. 2 at home. 1 in a bowl. Why is it only 2 in a row and not 3?? Hell the last 2 were in different seasons. 2 out of 3. None on the road. 2 wins by a FG. Wow. Good job! We had UGA at home last year with gameday and all. Same situation, we killed em. And it was probably a better team. Good win but quit manipulating the numbers. Its 2 for 3. Getting your shite pushed in by SC at home with a BCS game on the line didn't not happen just b/c you won the chicken bowl. Which is the last time an ACC team beat SC. Weve won what 5 out of 6 or so against ACC??