Started By
Message
re: Chicken-Curse cured: Clemson, Georgia fricked
Posted on 3/28/17 at 11:02 am to IStillMissDanny
Posted on 3/28/17 at 11:02 am to IStillMissDanny
2
Posted on 3/28/17 at 11:05 am to Cheese Grits
Alright. I think we've beat this topic up pretty good.
No one read that gibberish you just linked, you know.
No one read that gibberish you just linked, you know.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 11:05 am to Cheese Grits
11 - 4 = 73.33% for Southeastern Conference
SEC % :: 5 of 64 = 7.8% / 4 of 32 = 12.50% / 3 of 16 = 18.75% / 3 of 8 = 37.50%
SEC W/L FF = 0-0 / R1 = 4-1 / R2 = 3-1 / SS = 3-0 / EE = 1-2 / FF = ?-? / CG = ?-?
9 - 8 = 52.94% for Atlantic Coast Conference
ACC % :: 8 of 64 = 12.5% / 4 of 32 = 12.50% / 1 of 16 = 6.25% / 1 of 8 = 12.50%
ACC W/L FF = 0-1 / R1 = 6-2 / R2 = 1-5 / SS = 1-0 / EE = 1-0 / FF = ?-? / CG = ?-?
SEC % :: 5 of 64 = 7.8% / 4 of 32 = 12.50% / 3 of 16 = 18.75% / 3 of 8 = 37.50%
SEC W/L FF = 0-0 / R1 = 4-1 / R2 = 3-1 / SS = 3-0 / EE = 1-2 / FF = ?-? / CG = ?-?
9 - 8 = 52.94% for Atlantic Coast Conference
ACC % :: 8 of 64 = 12.5% / 4 of 32 = 12.50% / 1 of 16 = 6.25% / 1 of 8 = 12.50%
ACC W/L FF = 0-1 / R1 = 6-2 / R2 = 1-5 / SS = 1-0 / EE = 1-0 / FF = ?-? / CG = ?-?
This post was edited on 3/28/17 at 11:16 am
Posted on 3/28/17 at 11:10 am to IStillMissDanny
quote:
I think we've beat this topic up pretty good.
You just know you are beaten
quote:
No one read that gibberish you just linked
So I posted the summary above, clearly showing the SEC superiority to the ACC "supposed" superiority in this years tournament. Interesting that Taters admit they are not a basketball school (M or W) yet here they are on a SEC board debating ACC basketball. Could you be bigger dickriders? It is so entertaining to see you here showing your Tater intellect (or lack) for the SEC brethren to see.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 11:19 am to Cheese Grits
Wrong Clemson dude, dude.
I don't give a shite about SEC basketball. Or ACC basketball. I root for Clemson. That UNC basketball guy on here is just as big a dumbass as you are to me. Conferences don't win anything, unless you're a bottom-feeder and steal money from the winners.
I got in on this to point out the hypocrisy of the deluge of girl's basketball fans. It's OK to pull for a winner; just don't pretend you're fans of the sport when the numbers prove different.
I don't give a shite about SEC basketball. Or ACC basketball. I root for Clemson. That UNC basketball guy on here is just as big a dumbass as you are to me. Conferences don't win anything, unless you're a bottom-feeder and steal money from the winners.
I got in on this to point out the hypocrisy of the deluge of girl's basketball fans. It's OK to pull for a winner; just don't pretend you're fans of the sport when the numbers prove different.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 11:20 am to IStillMissDanny
quote:
I don't give a shite about SEC basketball. Or ACC basketball.
Clearly.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 11:25 am to IStillMissDanny
quote:
I don't give a shite about SEC basketball.
Yet you are on a SEC board posting about it.
quote:
Or ACC basketball.
Yet you have been on this thread fore pages
quote:
Conferences don't win anything
I tend to doubt your thinking as the SECN is paying close to 50 million a year, while the ACCN is paying…..
Wait for it….
Wait for it….
Wait for it….
Wait for it….
ZERO / NADA / ZILCH / ZIP
ACCN does not exist but thanks for playing.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 11:34 am to Cheese Grits
I used to think you were old and senile with these inane arguments you make, but maybe you're just a kid.
I've only commented on the amazing popularity of girls basketball in this thread. Sorry if that dampens your argument that I'm obsessed with SEC BB.
Clemson is in the thread title, by the way, drawing me like a moth to a flame.
I've only commented on the amazing popularity of girls basketball in this thread. Sorry if that dampens your argument that I'm obsessed with SEC BB.
Clemson is in the thread title, by the way, drawing me like a moth to a flame.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 11:40 am to IStillMissDanny
quote:
just don't pretend you're fans of the sport when the numbers prove different.
I do not pretend, I have followed SEC WBB since the 70's and this is pretty well known on here.
By overall conference the SEC leads the NCAA in WBB attendance
#1 SEC @ 1,108,511
#2 B1G@ 939,183
ACC is sitting down at 719,712
As for individual schools, SEC dominates the Top 50
SEC #1 South Carolina / 244,196
SEC #2 Tennessee / 177,004
ACC Louisville / 152,049
ACC Notre Dame / 134,991
SEC Kentucky / 116,164
SEC Mississippi State / 92,914
SEC Texas A&M / 82,734
ACC Dook / 71,944
SEC Missouri / 63,847
ACC Virginia / 61,093
ACC Florida State / 50,258
SEC Georgia / 49,844
SEC Vanderbilt / 46,496
SEC Louisiana State / 37,152
SEC Alabama / 45,066
SEC Auburn / 33,312
Notre Dame and Louisville are former Big East schools, and not charter ACC
Posted on 3/28/17 at 11:59 am to Cheese Grits
quote:
I have followed SEC WBB since the 70's
Well, good for you, I guess. I'm not trying to steal your happiness. Those girls are lucky to have a fan like you.
You pitched a fit several pages back because I referred to it as girl's basketball. That's all.
Regarding your chart, why does it matter that UL and Notre Dame aren't charter ACC schools? Does that make their numbers not count to you?
Is USCJr a charter SEC member? Texas A&M? Missouri? Do you count their numbers in your charts to show how much every SEC fan loves girl's basketball?
Posted on 3/28/17 at 12:07 pm to IStillMissDanny
Still arguing about shite you don't care about, eh?
Posted on 3/28/17 at 12:14 pm to CNB
I like the argument more than the subject. Still not arguing about SEC or ACC basketball or who's better, though.
In fact, I'm pulling for y'all to win. I don't really hate anything or anyone; if I'm an occasional dick, it's not mean-spirited. You frickers need something to be happy about. Besides girl's basketball, I mean.
In fact, I'm pulling for y'all to win. I don't really hate anything or anyone; if I'm an occasional dick, it's not mean-spirited. You frickers need something to be happy about. Besides girl's basketball, I mean.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 12:16 pm to Tillman
Rustled
Posted on 3/28/17 at 5:17 pm to IStillMissDanny
quote:
Regarding your chart, why does it matter that UL and Notre Dame aren't charter ACC schools?
As you said you did not really follow it it was more to educate that both had strong WBB history and fans from their days in the Big East where Uconn used to play. As illustration, a UL vs ND game in the Big East days was a 200 to 400 dollar ticket and a UL / ND vs Uconn game could go for twice that number. Sorta like a Lady Vol season ticket may have a face cost of 250 to 350 but you had a 1,000 dollar per seat minimum to get the ticket in the first place so your true cost was 1,250 to 1,350 per season ticket. Not sure any charter ACC WBB school had that kind of premium for their tickets.
Posted on 3/29/17 at 6:57 am to Cheese Grits
quote:
As you said you did not really follow it it was more to educate that both had strong WBB history and fans from their days in the Big East where Uconn used to play. As illustration, a UL vs ND game in the Big East days was a 200 to 400 dollar ticket and a UL / ND vs Uconn game could go for twice that number. Sorta like a Lady Vol season ticket may have a face cost of 250 to 350 but you had a 1,000 dollar per seat minimum to get the ticket in the first place so your true cost was 1,250 to 1,350 per season ticket. Not sure any charter ACC WBB school had that kind of premium for their tickets.
So basically, when girls basketball teams are winning, fans pay to see them? Very insightful. I believe I've been saying that this entire thread, but I'm glad you agree. Think anyone is paying 1,250 for season tickets now to see mediocre play (which it all is anyway)?
So those teams came to the ACC and what? Decided they didn't like that sport anymore? I don't follow your logic on why conference affiliation made Notre Dame quit caring about it. Is it all because they don't get to play UCONN? If so, that actually hurts your stance that people love girls basketball.
I will admit this is a dumb argument. I don't even know why I'm arguing that a shitty sport is shitty. I'll do better later today.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News