Started By
Message
re: Charles Scott/Keiland Williams/Trindon Holliday:
Posted on 8/3/09 at 1:49 pm to Maximus
Posted on 8/3/09 at 1:49 pm to Maximus
quote:
Why could someone who ran all over Auburn and Georgia who actually had a good rushing defense not be able to do anything against a sack of shite defense like Arkansas?
1) UGA and Auburn were middle of the pack Rush Defenses last year.
2)Michael Smith had more yards in the Auburn game anyway.
3) For probably the 3 toughest SEC teams, for each both Ark and LSU, to play last year (Florida, Ole Miss, Bama)
Michael Smith = 353 yards (6.09 yards/carry)
Charles Scott = 137 yards (2.98 yards/carry)
Way to show up for the big games CS

Posted on 8/3/09 at 1:53 pm to TheDoc
quote:
and I bet you think chad jones didn't knock the ball out of whats his nuts hands to save a touchdown...
what the frick does this even mean?
Posted on 8/3/09 at 1:56 pm to Funky Tide 8
quote:
Funky Tide 8
How many wins will ya'll have this season?
Posted on 8/3/09 at 2:17 pm to GoHoGsGo06
quote:
2)Michael Smith had more yards in the Auburn game anyway.
you're pretty much saying that Michael Smith is better because he had more yards
Posted on 8/3/09 at 2:18 pm to GoHoGsGo06
quote:
Way to show up for the big games CS
So Arky didn't stack the box considering LSU was starting a true freshman for the first time?

This fricking board is awesome today.
Posted on 8/3/09 at 2:22 pm to Prominentwon
quote:
So Arky didn't stack the box considering LSU was starting a true freshman for the first time?
Using that Logic:
LSU should have been playing a Nickle defense considering we had a upperclassman QB (for 1 half) and a freshman RB....?
But yet the true freshman RB torched yall, and Casey Dick wasnt too shabby either...good logic there
Posted on 8/3/09 at 2:23 pm to Funky Tide 8
Yeah, it is going to be a very hard to predict season. Bama and LSU are in fairly similar positions, imo.
Posted on 8/3/09 at 2:28 pm to TheDoc
there are some retards in this thread 

Posted on 8/3/09 at 2:30 pm to Klaus
quote:
Yeah, it is going to be a very hard to predict season. Bama and LSU are in fairly similar positions, imo.
I agree. There are just alot of questions on offense for us. It could go either way really.
Posted on 8/3/09 at 2:30 pm to S
quote:
there are some retards in this thread

they come out of the woodwork don't they?
Posted on 8/3/09 at 2:31 pm to Prominentwon
quote:
you're pretty much saying that Michael Smith is better because he had more yards
I was just responding to the person who said that Charles Scott "ran all over" Auburn by saying that Michael Smith had more yards.
In total, there is a 0.39 difference in yards/touch in the Auburn game comparison.
Posted on 8/3/09 at 2:31 pm to GoHoGsGo06
Keiland Williams Career:
229 rushes
1331 yards
5.81 ypc
13 touchdowns
0 fumbles
Not to bad for the guy backing up the 1st team all SEC back
229 rushes
1331 yards
5.81 ypc
13 touchdowns
0 fumbles
Not to bad for the guy backing up the 1st team all SEC back

Posted on 8/3/09 at 2:34 pm to GOBAMA90
quote:
Unless he gets significantly more touches this year, his draft status is questionable. That's a damn shame too, because IMO he is good enough to make the league.
Ever hear of a guy named Joseph Addai? A lot of people thought he was underused and LSU.
Posted on 8/3/09 at 2:35 pm to Prominentwon
Also:
Around 40% of Charles Scott's rush yards came from his OOC games (Appy State, North Texas, Tulane, and Troy)
Around 25% of Michael Smith's rush yards came from his OOC games (UL-Monroe, Texas, Tulsa)
CS rushed for 102 more yards in 2 more games played than Michael Smith
Around 40% of Charles Scott's rush yards came from his OOC games (Appy State, North Texas, Tulane, and Troy)
Around 25% of Michael Smith's rush yards came from his OOC games (UL-Monroe, Texas, Tulsa)
CS rushed for 102 more yards in 2 more games played than Michael Smith
Posted on 8/3/09 at 2:41 pm to GoHoGsGo06
Charles Scott faced 8 and 9 man fronts after the Auburn and Florida games, when opposing teams realized our QB sucked and we were most likely running the ball with CS in the game.
Did Michael Smith face 8 and 9 man fronts? No. Michael Smith mostly ran out of the spread, against nickel and dime packages.
Seriously, do you even watch football? Comparing a back like CS to Michael Smith is just dumb. They are completely different players.
If you want to compare CS to anybody, compare him to Anthony Dixon, Mark Ingram, and Ben Tate...all "big" backs.
I think if you look at the stats, CS compares very favorably with those guys.
Did Michael Smith face 8 and 9 man fronts? No. Michael Smith mostly ran out of the spread, against nickel and dime packages.
Seriously, do you even watch football? Comparing a back like CS to Michael Smith is just dumb. They are completely different players.
If you want to compare CS to anybody, compare him to Anthony Dixon, Mark Ingram, and Ben Tate...all "big" backs.
I think if you look at the stats, CS compares very favorably with those guys.
Posted on 8/3/09 at 2:56 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
Seriously, do you even watch football?
Yes, I watch just about every SEC every week, at least the highlights if I cant watch them all.
quote:
Comparing a back like CS to Michael Smith is just dumb. They are completely different players.
I'm not comparing the type of back they are, im comparing their productivity. You want to say "CS plays from I-Formation" (so does MS, in addition to spread), i say MS plays behind 3 and 4 star recruits, while CS plays behind 4 and 5 stars. Could go all day
Posted on 8/3/09 at 3:38 pm to TigerWoody
Good. Chance to be great. 

Posted on 8/3/09 at 3:41 pm to GoHoGsGo06
Michael Smith 4 Heisman. Arkansas will win it all
Popular
Back to top
