Started By
Message
re: Charles Scott/Keiland Williams/Trindon Holliday:
Posted on 8/3/09 at 10:53 am to TigerWoody
Posted on 8/3/09 at 10:53 am to TigerWoody
he is really not that good. sorry to be the bearer of bad news
Posted on 8/3/09 at 10:55 am to GoHoGsGo06
quote:
he is really not that good. sorry to be the bearer of bad news
SEC coaches and media personnel (and most sane people) think otherwise
and LOL@Scott being "fat"
Posted on 8/3/09 at 10:55 am to The Ramp
Prominentwon
You bitch entirely too much..
You bitch entirely too much..
Posted on 8/3/09 at 10:56 am to TheDoc
I would say great, but until Keiland gains 20 lbs of muscle and 5" off his calves I have to go with them only being considered good.
Posted on 8/3/09 at 10:57 am to GoHoGsGo06
quote:please go back to playing with your Ole Nuttsucker buddies.
GoHoGsGo06
Posted on 8/3/09 at 10:58 am to The Ramp
quote:
SEC coaches and media personnel (and most sane people) think otherwise
He is good, just not "that" good, as in all SEC hype he gets. He will once again be the 4th or 5th best rusher in the SEC when all is said and done
Posted on 8/3/09 at 10:59 am to GoHoGsGo06
quote:OK brainiac...list them.
He is good, just not "that" good, as in all SEC hype he gets. He will once again be the 4th or 5th best rusher in the SEC when all is said and done
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:04 am to TigerWoody
quote:
OK brainiac...list them.
Michael SMith
Mark Ingram
thjose two for sure are better than CS
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:06 am to GoHoGsGo06
I'm just too lazy to even argue with this 

Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:07 am to GoHoGsGo06
quote:
Michael SMith
Mark Ingram
very convincing.

Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:09 am to Klaus
Id take Holliday over CS, at least he is fast. CS is good for the "cloud of dust" 4-5 yard gainers. Still, 28 yards on 12 carries against the worst SEC rush defense, that is pretty embarassing
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:10 am to GOBAMA90
quote:
the coaching staff has done a horrible job mixing up the backs and getting this guy the ball.
this
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:11 am to GoHoGsGo06
Scott and the entire o line were hurt versus Arkansas but it is still horrible to lose to shitty Arkansas ever.
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:12 am to lsucoon
quote:
How is the OL looking this year other than Ciron Black?
miles said that it'll be the best since he's been here...
he's never said that before...
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:13 am to GoHoGsGo06
quote:
he is really not that good. sorry to be the bearer of bad news

Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:16 am to GoHoGsGo06
quote:
he is really not that good. sorry to be the bearer of bad news
but,yet he is better than every back in the SEC(the best football conference)
how does that work

This post was edited on 8/3/09 at 11:21 am
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:25 am to GoHoGsGo06
quote:
Id take Holliday over CS, at least he is fast. CS is good for the "cloud of dust" 4-5 yard gainers. Still, 28 yards on 12 carries against the worst SEC rush defense, that is pretty embarassing
I have Charles Scott as one of the top three backs in the SEC.
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:50 am to Maximus
quote:
Scott and the entire o line were hurt versus Arkansas but it is still horrible to lose to shitty Arkansas ever.
You can't argue with stupid. So I'm just going to point out another reasoning behind his numbers also. When you have a QB situation like LSU had, you stack the box with 9. No shite he had 28 yards. Isn't all that surprising, is it?
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:54 am to Prominentwon
CS isn't slow, and what he lacks in speed he makes up for in power.
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:59 am to Triple6Rebel
I dont undertstand how people can say CS is good but as a group they are decent. PEOPLE CMON. If you have 1 good back your RB's are good. If you have a good back with 2 guys who bring a different pace and are good at what they do, combined I think it is a great class of RB's for the team.
I don't think that they all 3 could start somewhere else, but together they are a 3 headed monster to be reckoned with.
I don't think that they all 3 could start somewhere else, but together they are a 3 headed monster to be reckoned with.
Popular
Back to top
