Started By
Message

re: Charles Scott/Keiland Williams/Trindon Holliday:

Posted on 8/3/09 at 10:53 am to
Posted by GoHoGsGo06
Member since Nov 2006
5739 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 10:53 am to
he is really not that good. sorry to be the bearer of bad news
Posted by The Ramp
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2004
12621 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 10:55 am to
quote:

he is really not that good. sorry to be the bearer of bad news


SEC coaches and media personnel (and most sane people) think otherwise

and LOL@Scott being "fat"
Posted by ThermoDynamicTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
1362 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 10:55 am to
Prominentwon

You bitch entirely too much..
Posted by Klaus
Del Boca Vista
Member since Sep 2008
4507 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 10:56 am to
I would say great, but until Keiland gains 20 lbs of muscle and 5" off his calves I have to go with them only being considered good.
Posted by TigerWoody
btwn where I was & where I will be
Member since Dec 2007
11387 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 10:57 am to
quote:

GoHoGsGo06
please go back to playing with your Ole Nuttsucker buddies.
Posted by GoHoGsGo06
Member since Nov 2006
5739 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 10:58 am to
quote:

SEC coaches and media personnel (and most sane people) think otherwise


He is good, just not "that" good, as in all SEC hype he gets. He will once again be the 4th or 5th best rusher in the SEC when all is said and done
Posted by TigerWoody
btwn where I was & where I will be
Member since Dec 2007
11387 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 10:59 am to
quote:

He is good, just not "that" good, as in all SEC hype he gets. He will once again be the 4th or 5th best rusher in the SEC when all is said and done
OK brainiac...list them.
Posted by GoHoGsGo06
Member since Nov 2006
5739 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:04 am to
quote:

OK brainiac...list them.


Michael SMith
Mark Ingram

thjose two for sure are better than CS
Posted by The Ramp
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2004
12621 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:06 am to
I'm just too lazy to even argue with this
Posted by Klaus
Del Boca Vista
Member since Sep 2008
4507 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:07 am to
quote:

Michael SMith
Mark Ingram




very convincing.
Posted by GoHoGsGo06
Member since Nov 2006
5739 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:09 am to
Id take Holliday over CS, at least he is fast. CS is good for the "cloud of dust" 4-5 yard gainers. Still, 28 yards on 12 carries against the worst SEC rush defense, that is pretty embarassing
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81329 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:10 am to
quote:

the coaching staff has done a horrible job mixing up the backs and getting this guy the ball.


this
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81329 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:11 am to
Scott and the entire o line were hurt versus Arkansas but it is still horrible to lose to shitty Arkansas ever.
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:12 am to
quote:

How is the OL looking this year other than Ciron Black?


miles said that it'll be the best since he's been here...

he's never said that before...
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:13 am to
quote:

he is really not that good. sorry to be the bearer of bad news


Posted by Sammobile
Hollywood South
Member since Jan 2009
22377 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:16 am to
quote:

he is really not that good. sorry to be the bearer of bad news

but,yet he is better than every back in the SEC(the best football conference)

how does that work
This post was edited on 8/3/09 at 11:21 am
Posted by Klaus
Del Boca Vista
Member since Sep 2008
4507 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Id take Holliday over CS, at least he is fast. CS is good for the "cloud of dust" 4-5 yard gainers. Still, 28 yards on 12 carries against the worst SEC rush defense, that is pretty embarassing



I have Charles Scott as one of the top three backs in the SEC.
Posted by Prominentwon
LSU, McNeese St. Fan
Member since Jan 2005
94372 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:50 am to
quote:

Scott and the entire o line were hurt versus Arkansas but it is still horrible to lose to shitty Arkansas ever.

You can't argue with stupid. So I'm just going to point out another reasoning behind his numbers also. When you have a QB situation like LSU had, you stack the box with 9. No shite he had 28 yards. Isn't all that surprising, is it?
Posted by Triple6Rebel
Kansas City
Member since Feb 2009
1584 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:54 am to
CS isn't slow, and what he lacks in speed he makes up for in power.
Posted by SouthOfSouth
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
43524 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 11:59 am to
I dont undertstand how people can say CS is good but as a group they are decent. PEOPLE CMON. If you have 1 good back your RB's are good. If you have a good back with 2 guys who bring a different pace and are good at what they do, combined I think it is a great class of RB's for the team.

I don't think that they all 3 could start somewhere else, but together they are a 3 headed monster to be reckoned with.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter