Started By
Message
Charles Bediako
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:02 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:02 pm
Alabama fans, tell me what’s different about his case than these football players.
4
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:04 pm to Lige
Same as it is for the Tx NFL player, the USCe NFL, etc...... it's different because it's LSU.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:04 pm to Lige
That one is even worse because Charles Bediako chose to forgo his remaining college eligibility.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:05 pm to Lige
They did it mid season quickly instead of the slow middle finger to the SEC preseason
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:12 pm to Lige
There was no specific SEC rule against it when he did it. Then as in this case the judge issued a TRO. The SEC then as now agreed not to punish the school while the TRO was in effect. Bediako was ruled ineligible at the hearing by a Tuscaloosa judge on the grounds the player had signed a G league contract. The matter was settled. Everyone thought that the ruling made it clear that signing a pro contract made a player ineligible. Alabama nor Bediako fought it. Alabama also never told the SEC they would follow court rulings over SEC rules. Alabama never told the SEC they refused to be governed by the SEC.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:15 pm to GeauxPanthers2
quote:
That one is even worse because Charles Bediako chose to forgo his remaining college eligibility.
Harris and Wright chose to forego their remaining eligibility when they signed NFL contracts.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News