Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/1/14 at 5:39 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
So by that rationale, Auburn can "claim" like 10 NC's.
5 actually.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 5:40 pm to Korin
Still waiting for you to back up your claim.
And yeah, I called you out because I already know you can't.
And yeah, I called you out because I already know you can't.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 5:41 pm to Korin
quote:
5 actually.
Wrong.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 5:42 pm to MrAUTigers
Here's the records book. Starts on page 74.
https://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/football_records/2013/FBS.pdf
https://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/football_records/2013/FBS.pdf
Posted on 9/1/14 at 5:46 pm to Korin
1910 - Led by head coach Mike Donahue (1904–1906, 1908–1922), the team went 6–1 while outscoring opponents 176–9.
1913 - Went 8–0, outscoring opponents 224–13. Champions of the Southern Intercollegiate Athletic Association.
1914 - The Tigers finished as SIAA champions with a record of 8–0–1 , 5–0–1 in the SIAA. The Tigers didn’t let an opponent outscore score all season, 193–0. The 0-0 tie came against Georgia.
1983 - Finished the season with an 11–1 record and won their first SEC title since 1957. No. 1 Nebraska and No. 2 Texas lost their bowl games while No. 3 Auburn defeated No. 8 Michigan State in the Sugar Bowl. The No. 5 Miami Hurricanes, who knocked off Nebraska, jumped from 5th to claim the AP National Championship. The Tigers did finish ranked first in a few polls including the computer rankings utilized by The New York Times.
1993 – The only major college football team to finish the season undefeated with a record of 11–0. The Tigers were on NCAA probation though. In the fall of 1991 Eric Ramsey, a former Auburn defensive back, revealed taped conversations detailing how he received money from of the Auburn football program. The ban meant no TV, no SEC Championship and no bowl game. The National Champions Foundation recognized Auburn as one of its 1993 national champions.
2004 – Despite a 13–0 record which included the SEC title, the Tigers were left out of the BCS National Championship game. The BCS ranked Southern Cal and Oklahoma No. 1 and No. 2 respectively. Auburn settled for the Sugar Bowl and defeated No. 9 Virginia Tech. The Trojans had the national title vacated years later after an investigation concluded that running back Reggie Bush and his family obtained impermissible benefits.
LINK
You always use one sight, which is comical as hell, like that is the definitive proof of your argument. bama's "claim" to fame is "claiming" a NC if anybody recognized them. If Auburn did the same thing, we would have more than 2.
1913 - Went 8–0, outscoring opponents 224–13. Champions of the Southern Intercollegiate Athletic Association.
1914 - The Tigers finished as SIAA champions with a record of 8–0–1 , 5–0–1 in the SIAA. The Tigers didn’t let an opponent outscore score all season, 193–0. The 0-0 tie came against Georgia.
1983 - Finished the season with an 11–1 record and won their first SEC title since 1957. No. 1 Nebraska and No. 2 Texas lost their bowl games while No. 3 Auburn defeated No. 8 Michigan State in the Sugar Bowl. The No. 5 Miami Hurricanes, who knocked off Nebraska, jumped from 5th to claim the AP National Championship. The Tigers did finish ranked first in a few polls including the computer rankings utilized by The New York Times.
1993 – The only major college football team to finish the season undefeated with a record of 11–0. The Tigers were on NCAA probation though. In the fall of 1991 Eric Ramsey, a former Auburn defensive back, revealed taped conversations detailing how he received money from of the Auburn football program. The ban meant no TV, no SEC Championship and no bowl game. The National Champions Foundation recognized Auburn as one of its 1993 national champions.
2004 – Despite a 13–0 record which included the SEC title, the Tigers were left out of the BCS National Championship game. The BCS ranked Southern Cal and Oklahoma No. 1 and No. 2 respectively. Auburn settled for the Sugar Bowl and defeated No. 9 Virginia Tech. The Trojans had the national title vacated years later after an investigation concluded that running back Reggie Bush and his family obtained impermissible benefits.
LINK
You always use one sight, which is comical as hell, like that is the definitive proof of your argument. bama's "claim" to fame is "claiming" a NC if anybody recognized them. If Auburn did the same thing, we would have more than 2.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 5:47 pm to MrAUTigers
So I post the records book, and you rebuke with a blog?
Posted on 9/1/14 at 5:49 pm to Korin
quote:
So I post the records book, and you rebuke with a blog?
You post one sites record book. One organization, or another, named Auburn NC's in most of those years.
This post was edited on 9/1/14 at 5:50 pm
Posted on 9/1/14 at 5:49 pm to MrAUTigers
Dude is always posting the same ncaa record book acting like the arbitrary list of polls in the book is the authority for mythical national championships when the NCAA does not even recognize national champions in football.
It is pathetic. It is one of many sources of many different compilations of polls, nothing more.
Yet dude talks out of his arse constantly like the arbitrary shite his arbitrary arse wants to use is some sort of definitive source.
I call him out from time to time to prove a point which he can never back up anything I call him out on.
He can sure as frick post the shite out of that same compilation though.
It is pathetic. It is one of many sources of many different compilations of polls, nothing more.
Yet dude talks out of his arse constantly like the arbitrary shite his arbitrary arse wants to use is some sort of definitive source.
I call him out from time to time to prove a point which he can never back up anything I call him out on.
He can sure as frick post the shite out of that same compilation though.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 5:50 pm to MrAUTigers
I posted the official NCAA records book. Now you're just trolling.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 5:51 pm to Korin
The NCAA doesn't recognize any NC's in football. That was your first misstep.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 5:51 pm to MrAUTigers
Award, no.
Recognize, yes.
Recognize, yes.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 5:52 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
You post one sites record book. One organization, or another, named Auburn NC's in most of those years.
Yep. Dumbass was totally unaware more selectors picked AU as NC in 1983 than Miami.
After being educated about it, he just went back to posting the same tired shite like 8 times in one thread. He doesn't reason well, he just has linking to that compilation down cold.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 5:53 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
You always use one sight, which is comical as hell, like that is the definitive proof of your argument. bama's "claim" to fame is "claiming" a NC if anybody recognized them. If Auburn did the same thing, we would have more than 2.
Bingo. Guy is a joke. He is just a rather persistent one.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 5:53 pm to MrAUTigers
Of course you're free to claim whatever you'd like, but it'll still be far less than Alabama, and we're free to laugh at y'all putting 1993 and 2004 in your sig (s).
Posted on 9/1/14 at 5:57 pm to Korin
So why did bama wait until like 1984 to double their NC totals?
LINK
So the NCAA changed their record books after this?
quote:
The NCAA record book recognizes Alabama with seven "consensus" national championships -- the six by Bryant and 1992.
quote:
The SEC follows the NCAA approach by starting its count at 1950 and recognizes Alabama with seven.
quote:
"I tried to make Alabama football look the best it could look and just make it as great as it could possibly be," Atcheson said. "I was a competitor myself with the other schools, and what they bragged about and boasted about, I wanted people to know the best about my school."
LINK
So the NCAA changed their record books after this?
Posted on 9/1/14 at 6:00 pm to diddydirtyAubie
notre dame's the most bogus...no bowls from 26ish to 68ish...66 77 stolen from bama per ivan maisel and all intelligent peeps....bama add 66 77 45 75
Posted on 9/1/14 at 6:05 pm to Korin
quote:
Award, no. Recognize, yes.
Wrong again. For someone who posts so much on this topic, I think it is safe to say you have embarrassed yourself quite thoroughly.
quote:
While the NCAA has never officially endorsed a championship team, it has documented the choices of several selectors in the official NCAA Football Bowl Subdivision Records
It documents SOME selectors. It neither recognizes or awards a champion in football, ever.
Understand, documenting someone's opinion is not the same as recognizing a champion.
quote:
This is often invoked in reference to American college football because the NCAA does not sponsor a playoff-style tournament or recognize official national champions for the Football Bowl Subdivision
Posted on 9/1/14 at 6:09 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
1914 - barn's tie eliminates them
Posted on 9/1/14 at 6:10 pm to MrAUTigers
Wait, I thought the NCAA didn't recognize anything?
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News