Started By
Message
re: Cam Gate not over
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:14 pm to NBamaAlum
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:14 pm to NBamaAlum
Doesn't matter.
I provided a link.
You can't.
Any conclusions you jumped to are based on information NOT KNOWN AT THIS TIME. So basically, you pussies are guessing because you want it to be true so bad.
I provided a link.
You can't.
Any conclusions you jumped to are based on information NOT KNOWN AT THIS TIME. So basically, you pussies are guessing because you want it to be true so bad.
This post was edited on 12/1/10 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:15 pm to Stanky Legg
GentryEstes247 Gentry Estes
Summing it up: Cam can play, but investigation isn't over. Auburn is in good shape short-term but I actually think worse shape long-term.
DanWetzel Dan Wetzel
by CecilHurt
Newton case is not over. This is just immediate eligibility ruling. An ongoing enforcement staff investigation can lead to more later
schadjoe Joe Schad
NCAAs decision based on "information available at this time."
slmandel Stewart Mandel
If you read between the lines at the end of the release, this violation has been addressed, but the larger investigation likely ongoing.
Summing it up: Cam can play, but investigation isn't over. Auburn is in good shape short-term but I actually think worse shape long-term.
DanWetzel Dan Wetzel
by CecilHurt
Newton case is not over. This is just immediate eligibility ruling. An ongoing enforcement staff investigation can lead to more later
schadjoe Joe Schad
NCAAs decision based on "information available at this time."
slmandel Stewart Mandel
If you read between the lines at the end of the release, this violation has been addressed, but the larger investigation likely ongoing.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:15 pm to Stanky Legg
quote:No, he hasn't been, but he will be. Da barn as well.
Newton has been lit up opponents, the SEC and the Auburn record books.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:16 pm to Stanky Legg
Cam is declared eligible for now.
The investigations isn't closed.
Those are the facts.
The investigations isn't closed.
Those are the facts.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:18 pm to wmr
Keep wishing in one hand and shitting in the other.
See which fills up first.
See which fills up first.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:18 pm to Stanky Legg
quote:
Doesn't matter.
I provided a link.
You can't.
Any conclusions you jumped to are based on information NOT KNOWN AT THIS TIME. So basically, you pussies are guessing because you want it to be true so bad.
Staanky love bug... not everyone is guessing. I don't think much has changed... it doesn't mean it won't, but this was expected.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:19 pm to Stanky Legg
I just stated the facts.
You scared?
You scared?
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:20 pm to Bellabama
Please don't try to downplay it because it was "expected."
You, and everyone on the rant, would be lying if you EVER thought the SEC would make this ruling. You all thought that the SEC ALREADY had incriminating information. They don't.
Stop referencing the Bush situation. That changed after their ruling because they received new and credibile information.
There is no additional damning information that is going to come out in the conspiracy formerly known as CamGate.
You, and everyone on the rant, would be lying if you EVER thought the SEC would make this ruling. You all thought that the SEC ALREADY had incriminating information. They don't.
Stop referencing the Bush situation. That changed after their ruling because they received new and credibile information.
There is no additional damning information that is going to come out in the conspiracy formerly known as CamGate.
This post was edited on 12/1/10 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:20 pm to Stanky Legg
quote:
Keep wishing in one hand and shitting in the other.
See which fills up first.
Constipation would make this interesting.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:21 pm to WDE24
Because before I saw the light after the Clemson game, I was a dreaded bammer. I remember saying the same thing the AU fans are saying while the textbook thing was going on. It isn't over..
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:21 pm to bamafan425
quote:
Why did Auburn declare him ineligible now, if they investigated in the Summer and found nothing?
Because the ncaa concluded yesterday that a rules violation did in fact occur. Therefore Auburn HAD to declare him ineligible and ask for immediate re-instatement. What this means is that something improper did in fact occur. What is doesn't say is that the matter is closed. It isn't! However, it is unlikely that the NCAA will reach a final conclusion until well after the season is over. Cam IS eligible to play now but it doesn't mean he is all clear. It means that the NCAA hasn't reached a conclusion on the case but in the meantime Cam can play. It is possible that the NCAA could rule later that he was ineligible.
This post was edited on 12/1/10 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:21 pm to Bellabama
quote:
Staanky love bug... not everyone is guessing. I don't think much has changed... it doesn't mean it won't, but this was expected
How can this statement be argued with? <sigh> I'm in no rush but this is far from over.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:22 pm to wmr
quote:
You scared?
Yes.
Petrified. Terrified.
Of you.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:24 pm to Jaydeaux
True. I want Cam eligible to beat the Cocks.
I believe more will eventually come out.
Regardless of what Auburn does the rest of the season, in the minds of college sports fans (at least the ones who spend time on the internet), they are dirty.
And that won't ever buff out.
I believe more will eventually come out.
Regardless of what Auburn does the rest of the season, in the minds of college sports fans (at least the ones who spend time on the internet), they are dirty.
And that won't ever buff out.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:24 pm to Stanky Legg
quote:
There is no additional damning information that is going to come out in the conspiracy formerly known as CamGate.
Link?
Maybe you should stop wishing in one hand.


Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:25 pm to wmr
Move along. Nothing to see here. You gotta know when to hold em, know when to fold em.....
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:26 pm to GeauxWarTigers
quote:
Link?
Maybe you should stop wishing in one hand.
You can't prove something doesn't exist, dipshit.
You can however, prove that they don't know it exists.
They did that today.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:26 pm to fontell
Sorry, but its apprent that the Newton family is dirty as hell.
The extent to which that can be proven is all that is up in the air.
The extent to which that can be proven is all that is up in the air.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:27 pm to Stanky Legg
The black swan is what ends up getting you. The things that you don't know you don't know...
Posted on 12/1/10 at 12:27 pm to wmr
BOOM!
nothing like the responses from the Gumps being tweets from fellow disgruntled gumps
nothing like the responses from the Gumps being tweets from fellow disgruntled gumps
Popular
Back to top
